Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1865298824> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1865298824 endingPage "57" @default.
- W1865298824 startingPage "49" @default.
- W1865298824 abstract "Background There are sparse data showing the extent to which evidence-based public health is occurring among local health departments. Purpose The purpose of the study was to describe the patterns and predictors of administrative evidence-based practices (structures and activities that are associated with performance measures) in a representative sample of local health departments in the U.S. Methods A cross-sectional study of 517 local health department directors was conducted from October through December 2012 (analysis in January–March 2013). The questions on administrative evidence-based practices included 19 items based on a recent literature review (five broad domains: workforce development, leadership, organizational climate and culture, relationships and partnerships, financial processes). Results There was a wide range in performance among the 19 individual administrative evidence-based practices, ranging from 35% for providing access to current information on evidence-based practices to 96% for funding via a variety of sources Among the five domains, values were generally lowest for organizational climate and culture (mean for the domain=49.9%) and highest for relationships and partnerships (mean for the domain=77.1%). Variables associated with attaining the highest tertile of administrative evidence-based practices included having a population jurisdiction of 25,000 or larger (adjusted ORs [aORs] ranging from 4.4 to 7.5) and state governance structure (aOR=3.1). Conclusions This research on the patterns and predictors of administrative evidence-based practices in health departments provides information on gaps and areas for improvement that can be linked with ongoing quality improvement processes. There are sparse data showing the extent to which evidence-based public health is occurring among local health departments. The purpose of the study was to describe the patterns and predictors of administrative evidence-based practices (structures and activities that are associated with performance measures) in a representative sample of local health departments in the U.S. A cross-sectional study of 517 local health department directors was conducted from October through December 2012 (analysis in January–March 2013). The questions on administrative evidence-based practices included 19 items based on a recent literature review (five broad domains: workforce development, leadership, organizational climate and culture, relationships and partnerships, financial processes). There was a wide range in performance among the 19 individual administrative evidence-based practices, ranging from 35% for providing access to current information on evidence-based practices to 96% for funding via a variety of sources Among the five domains, values were generally lowest for organizational climate and culture (mean for the domain=49.9%) and highest for relationships and partnerships (mean for the domain=77.1%). Variables associated with attaining the highest tertile of administrative evidence-based practices included having a population jurisdiction of 25,000 or larger (adjusted ORs [aORs] ranging from 4.4 to 7.5) and state governance structure (aOR=3.1). This research on the patterns and predictors of administrative evidence-based practices in health departments provides information on gaps and areas for improvement that can be linked with ongoing quality improvement processes." @default.
- W1865298824 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1865298824 creator A5008119078 @default.
- W1865298824 creator A5027468700 @default.
- W1865298824 creator A5038068208 @default.
- W1865298824 creator A5053977932 @default.
- W1865298824 creator A5066148669 @default.
- W1865298824 creator A5084691556 @default.
- W1865298824 creator A5091762169 @default.
- W1865298824 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W1865298824 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W1865298824 title "Understanding Administrative Evidence-Based Practices" @default.
- W1865298824 cites W125348581 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W148428889 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1572713403 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1585156633 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W180137463 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W190529269 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1907051618 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1923663552 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1950332693 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1967888523 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1974027114 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1980450068 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1982624052 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1989386678 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1990653665 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1993552335 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2000974311 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2002773794 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2003509631 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2003733771 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2007687785 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2009158349 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2010067478 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2014900897 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2020155291 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2020629703 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2022528163 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2031688158 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2038686383 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2039597377 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2039883769 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2040904583 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2044858486 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2050621390 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2053953678 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2063848895 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2066514795 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2071241888 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2072932508 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2073703034 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2074618207 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2076525721 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2079581804 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2082057239 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2091527106 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2098969812 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2100612594 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2108640103 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2119200686 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2125451304 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2128504474 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2131192446 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2132926926 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2133490696 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2134286159 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2149621339 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2150898109 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2150970469 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2151380904 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2153793140 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2156151681 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2159306398 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2159579686 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2159948545 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2161787644 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2164777277 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2165137003 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2209524472 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2314370404 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2316370008 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2327070619 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2328227529 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2329363451 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W2417299621 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W3124974540 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W4248000428 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W80410882 @default.
- W1865298824 cites W1977023604 @default.
- W1865298824 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.013" @default.
- W1865298824 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3982585" @default.
- W1865298824 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24355671" @default.
- W1865298824 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W1865298824 type Work @default.
- W1865298824 sameAs 1865298824 @default.
- W1865298824 citedByCount "48" @default.
- W1865298824 countsByYear W18652988242014 @default.