FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1866809985> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1866809985 abstract "Assessment processes have been identified as a key way to ‘bring learning and teaching together through engaging students as partners’ (Healey et al 2014). Students frequently interact with content and engage with their peers through mobile devices and hence are familiar with expressing themselves using this medium. Mobile learning has been proposed to work on a pedagogical framework of (1) engagement, (2) presence and (3) flexibility, encouraging awareness of self and others through student-content, student-student and student-teacher interactions (Danaher et al 2009). Through the proposed workshop we will demonstrate the process and encourage delegates to consider how mobile polling can be used to adopt a consultative/partnership approach to the design of assessment and feedback at a modular level.On a relatively large Level 4 physiology module, I have used a variety of paper-based, online and informal student feedback techniques over several years. Throughout that time, despite large quantities of valuable student feedback being obtained, no references have ever been made about either the type of assessment chosen or the weightings allocated by staff. It seems that these cohorts accepted the nature of assessment as being dictated by staff. In 2013/4 I used online discussion boards in the VLE to capture students’ proposals for changing the type of assessment and assessment weightings and implemented an averaged weighting of these proposals for the following cohort. In 2014/5 I progressed to the use of polling through mobile devices and found it very valuable in establishing a partnership with students in assessment and feedback design. On a Likert Scale from 1-5 (strongly disagree-strongly agree), students rated the use of Poll Everywhere 4.5 in terms of satisfaction. Poll Everywhere is an audience response system that is free to use for up to 40 simultaneous user responses. Polling can be performed from a web browser or embedded into a PowerPoint presentation as a slide. The audience can respond via sending a text, using a mobile application (an ‘app’), or a website. The benefits of real-time online polling are: • Immediacy of the response • Equality of voice/opportunity – not just capturing the more vocal students’ opinions• Engages students who rarely participate due to shyness or risk aversion (Graham et al 2007)• Students can interact with their peers’ responses as the poll progresses• Questions can be created or altered quickly during the sessionThe opinions of a large class can be captured quickly, which informs facilitation of the session. Staff can seek consensus, clarification and encourage debate using individual or aggregated student responses during class time and have this information easily accessible afterwards.ReferencesDanaher P, Gururajan R and Hafeez-Baig A (2009) Transforming the practice of mobile learning: promoting pedagogical innovation through educational principles and strategies that work, in Innovative mobile learning: Techniques and technologies, eds H. Ryu & D. Parsons, IGI Global, Hershey, 21-46.Graham CR, Tripp TR, Seawright B and Joeckel GL (2007) Empowering or Compelling Reluctant Participators Using Audience Response Systems. Active Learning in Higher Education 8(3): 233-58.Healey M, Flint A and Harrington K (2014) Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: HE Academy" @default.
• W1866809985 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1866809985 creator A5069706537 @default.
• W1866809985 creator A5079428431 @default.
• W1866809985 date "2015-03-27" @default.
• W1866809985 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1866809985 title "Using online and mobile student polling techniques to engage students in assessment design." @default.
• W1866809985 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1866809985 type Work @default.
• W1866809985 sameAs 1866809985 @default.
• W1866809985 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1866809985 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1866809985 hasAuthorship W1866809985A5069706537 @default.
• W1866809985 hasAuthorship W1866809985A5079428431 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C186967261 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C194519906 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C204854418 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C2780598303 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C71750763 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C105795698 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C111919701 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C126838900 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C136764020 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C145420912 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C15744967 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C17744445 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C186967261 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C194519906 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C199539241 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C204854418 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C2777601897 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C2780598303 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C33923547 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C41008148 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C49774154 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C509550671 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C71750763 @default.
• W1866809985 hasConceptScore W1866809985C71924100 @default.
• W1866809985 hasLocation W18668099851 @default.
• W1866809985 hasOpenAccess W1866809985 @default.
• W1866809985 hasPrimaryLocation W18668099851 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W1822449242 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W183832583 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W185386673 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W1971161328 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2166509280 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2182411676 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2247605541 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2307203783 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2412733574 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2734611108 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2758436114 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2763373811 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2765883506 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W28205328 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W3178290928 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W919100031 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2186851908 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2272296130 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2495642457 @default.
• W1866809985 hasRelatedWork W2749664215 @default.
• W1866809985 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1866809985 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1866809985 magId "1866809985" @default.
• W1866809985 workType "article" @default.