FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1873477496> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1873477496 endingPage "131" @default.
• W1873477496 startingPage "126" @default.
• W1873477496 abstract "In Brief Objectives The primary aim is to compare safety and long-term outcomes between uterine-sparing prolapse procedures performed using 4 different surgical routes over a 9-year period. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent uterine-sparing prolapse procedures performed by 10 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeons between January 2003 and December 2011. Demographic information, operative characteristics, complications (intraoperative and postoperative), and prolapse recurrence were obtained by chart review. Additional information collected included subsequent uterine or cervical pathology, procedures, and pregnancies. Results Two hundred forty uterine-sparing prolapse procedures were performed in the 9-year period. One hundred two patients (42.5%) underwent a vaginal procedure, 95 patients (39.6%) underwent a conventional laparoscopic procedure, 28 patients (11.7%) underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure, and 15 patients (6.3%) underwent an abdominal procedure. Median follow-up time and interquartile range for abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical routes were 16.4 (3.9–23.9), 14 (3.3–36.4), 22.6 (2.9–64.5), and 6.1 (3–24.4) months, respectively. Prolapse recurrence rates were similar for all groups (abdominal 13.3%, vaginal 14.7%, laparoscopic 11.6%, robotic 3.6%; P = 0.39). Intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term complications rates were similar between all groups (P = 0.63, P = 0.43, P = 0.10). The rate of benign gynecologic conditions encountered after surgery was similar among all groups, with an overall rate of abnormal uterine bleeding/postmenopausal bleeding of 5.4% and overall rate of cervical dysplasia of 0.8%. Two pregnancies were reported, both undergoing cesarean delivery at term. Conclusions Uterine-sparing prolapse procedures appear to have good long-term safety and a low risk of future gynecologic pathology. Uterine-sparing prolapse procedures appear to have good long-term safety and a low risk of future gynecologic pathology." @default.
• W1873477496 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1873477496 creator A5027682118 @default.
• W1873477496 creator A5044315618 @default.
• W1873477496 creator A5055610256 @default.
• W1873477496 date "2016-05-01" @default.
• W1873477496 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W1873477496 title "Uterine Conservation During Prolapse Repair" @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1571978704 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1966881478 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1972686426 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1972958144 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1977276811 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1978913233 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1983306840 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1991197456 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W1995664907 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2024431462 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2042231574 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2048671386 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2054346391 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2062652656 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2067439230 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2073129216 @default.
• W1873477496 cites W2334954175 @default.
• W1873477496 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000221" @default.
• W1873477496 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26516818" @default.
• W1873477496 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W1873477496 type Work @default.
• W1873477496 sameAs 1873477496 @default.
• W1873477496 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W1873477496 countsByYear W18734774962018 @default.
• W1873477496 countsByYear W18734774962019 @default.
• W1873477496 countsByYear W18734774962020 @default.
• W1873477496 countsByYear W18734774962021 @default.
• W1873477496 countsByYear W18734774962022 @default.
• W1873477496 countsByYear W18734774962023 @default.
• W1873477496 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1873477496 hasAuthorship W1873477496A5027682118 @default.
• W1873477496 hasAuthorship W1873477496A5044315618 @default.
• W1873477496 hasAuthorship W1873477496A5055610256 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConcept C119060515 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConceptScore W1873477496C119060515 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConceptScore W1873477496C141071460 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConceptScore W1873477496C167135981 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConceptScore W1873477496C2780047204 @default.
• W1873477496 hasConceptScore W1873477496C71924100 @default.
• W1873477496 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1873477496 hasLocation W18734774961 @default.
• W1873477496 hasLocation W18734774962 @default.
• W1873477496 hasOpenAccess W1873477496 @default.
• W1873477496 hasPrimaryLocation W18734774961 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2061253854 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2135221496 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2390961722 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W1873477496 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W1873477496 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W1873477496 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1873477496 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1873477496 magId "1873477496" @default.
• W1873477496 workType "article" @default.