FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W187449947> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W187449947 endingPage "545" @default.
• W187449947 startingPage "528" @default.
• W187449947 abstract "This study examined the major challenges confronting female intercollegiate athletic directors and directors of women's intercollegiate athletics programs of NCAA member institutions. A 34-item questionnaire was mailed to 169 female intercollegiate athletic directors and directors of women's intercollegiate athletics programs. Of the 169 directors contacted, 85 (50.3%) returned the questionnaire in its completed form. The findings indicated that budget/funding issues and personnel issues had the single highest number of responses across the total sample. Nearly three fourths of the responses (70.3%) from Division I directors were associated with budget/fundraising, Title IX (gender/pay equity), and inadequate facilities. For Division II, over half (53.5%) of the responses were associated with issues of budgeting/funding, personnel and dealing with the good ole' boys network. Of the 77 responses in Division III, slightly over half (53.5%) were associated with personnel and budgeting issues. The findings are far from conclusive, however they do have implications for: (1) the practice of intercollegiate athletic administration, (2) undergraduate and graduate programs and courses in sport management and sport studies, and (3) the development of future research in the new and emerging field of sport management. ********** Since the 1970s, women have gained an increasing share of administrative positions in intercollegiate athletics (Suggs, 2000). It was during the 1970s when the first female intercollegiate athletic director, Betty Kruczek was hired at Fitchburg State College (MA). Mary A. Hill was hired during the early 1980s as athletic director of San Diego State (CA). Other female pioneers of athletic administration included Judy Sweet, who became the first female to serve as President of the NCAA from 1991-93, and Barbara Hedges, who became the first female to serve as President of the National Associate of Collegiate Directors of Athletics (NACDA) (Killy, 1996). By 1995, women held 35 percent of the athletic-administration positions at NCAA member institutions (Suggs, 2000). Such positions were classified as athletic directors, associate athletic directors, senior woman administrators (SWAs), business managers, faculty athletic representatives, assistant athletic directors, compliance coordinators, academic advisors, graduate assistants, and interns. During the 1999-2000 academic year for member institutions of the NCAA, the positions were made up of 19,124 individuals (Suggs, 2000). Of this number of individuals, 995 were athletic directors. The majority of the director positions were filled by males (n=825 or 82.9%) and the remaining number (n= 170 or 17.1%) were females (Suggs, 2000). During a most recent analysis it was found that there were 27 female athletic directors of NCAA Division I, 41 in Division II, and 108 in Division III (Acosta & Carpenter, 2002). It was also reported that NCAA Division III programs are most likely to have a female head administrator (27.6%) while Division I programs are the least likely (8.4%) (Acosta & Carpenter, 2002). These findings raise the question of why so few women are represented as athletic directors in the filed of intercollegiate athletics today. Despite the increasing numbers of women in athletic administrative positions, the aforementioned statistics have indicated that women are definitely underrepresented in one of the most powerful positions in intercollegiate athletics--the athletic directors' position. As of 2002, there were 885 directors of athletics of NCAA member institutions (http://www.ncaa.org/about/div_criteria.html). Of this number, 297 (33.6%) were directors of Division I, 230, (26.0%) were directors of Division II member institutions, and 357 (40.3%) were directors of Division III member institutions (http://www.ncaa.org/about/div_criteria.html). Purpose and Significance of this Study Prior to this investigation, the researchers found no scientific studies which identified challenges confronting female intercollegiate athletic directors. …" @default.
• W187449947 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W187449947 creator A5011881311 @default.
• W187449947 creator A5038379953 @default.
• W187449947 creator A5090991591 @default.
• W187449947 date "2006-09-01" @default.
• W187449947 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W187449947 title "Challenges Confronting Female Intercollegiate Athletic Directors of NCAA Member Institutions by Division" @default.
• W187449947 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W187449947 type Work @default.
• W187449947 sameAs 187449947 @default.
• W187449947 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W187449947 countsByYear W1874499472012 @default.
• W187449947 countsByYear W1874499472013 @default.
• W187449947 countsByYear W1874499472015 @default.
• W187449947 countsByYear W1874499472018 @default.
• W187449947 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W187449947 hasAuthorship W187449947A5011881311 @default.
• W187449947 hasAuthorship W187449947A5038379953 @default.
• W187449947 hasAuthorship W187449947A5090991591 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C199728807 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C2780020723 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C2984776528 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W187449947 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C120912362 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C144024400 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C15744967 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C162324750 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C17744445 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C187736073 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C199539241 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C199728807 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C2780020723 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C2984776528 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C36289849 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C39549134 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C509550671 @default.
• W187449947 hasConceptScore W187449947C71924100 @default.
• W187449947 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W187449947 hasLocation W1874499471 @default.
• W187449947 hasOpenAccess W187449947 @default.
• W187449947 hasPrimaryLocation W1874499471 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W1572851237 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W1584355225 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W1618117578 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2054919643 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2106841086 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2120850613 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2129389912 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2400272798 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2467175055 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2501368516 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2530273064 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2597419721 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2625187997 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W2905156359 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W3033876100 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W3196427810 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W331965282 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W41037797 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W413631866 @default.
• W187449947 hasRelatedWork W9231794 @default.
• W187449947 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W187449947 isParatext "false" @default.
• W187449947 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W187449947 magId "187449947" @default.
• W187449947 workType "article" @default.