Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1877309905> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 items per page.
- W1877309905 endingPage "340" @default.
- W1877309905 startingPage "340" @default.
- W1877309905 abstract "Background: There has been a wide range of success rates reported for those achieving vaginal birth following a planned vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).Objective: (1) To find out the incidence of rupture uterus and dehiscence in patients with trial of labor after cesarean section, (2) to evaluate the incidence of vaginal delivery in women who had previously undergone a cesarean section, and (3) comparison of a trial of labor after cesarean with an elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) in view of maternal outcomes.Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, PDU Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India, from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015.Result: During the study period, 10,315 deliveries were noted, of which patients who underwent a previous cesarean section were 1,082. Among the previous cesarean cases, trial of labor was given for 222 of them, of which, successful VBAC was found in 136 (61.26%) cases, while in 86 (38.74%) cases, an emergency cesarean was performed. In 860 cases, ERCS was done. Incidence of rupture and dehiscence in trial of labor group was 4.5% (10 cases) and 2.7% (6 cases), respectively, while no rupture was noted in the ERCS group. Scar dehiscence was found in 8 cases (0.93%) in the ERCS group. In 2 cases among the trial of labor group, obstetric hysterectomy was performed for rupture, while in 2 cases, bladder injury was noted. No maternal morbidities were noted in the ERCS group. No mortality was recorded in the study period.Conclusion: Hence, decision for trial of labor or ERCS should be taken as per the patient’s choice, through detailed history and examination. Even though many studies showing success rate of VBAC higher, maternal morbidities associated complications of trial of labor are life threatening, and we conclude ERCS is safer when compared with VBAC in view of maternal outcome." @default.
- W1877309905 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1877309905 creator A5025752939 @default.
- W1877309905 creator A5052583946 @default.
- W1877309905 creator A5054253698 @default.
- W1877309905 creator A5077515455 @default.
- W1877309905 date "2016-01-01" @default.
- W1877309905 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W1877309905 title "A prospective comparative study of a trial of labor after cesarean vs. elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) in view of maternal outcomes" @default.
- W1877309905 doi "https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2016.14102015130" @default.
- W1877309905 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W1877309905 type Work @default.
- W1877309905 sameAs 1877309905 @default.
- W1877309905 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1877309905 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1877309905 hasAuthorship W1877309905A5025752939 @default.
- W1877309905 hasAuthorship W1877309905A5052583946 @default.
- W1877309905 hasAuthorship W1877309905A5054253698 @default.
- W1877309905 hasAuthorship W1877309905A5077515455 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C2909718597 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C3020128735 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C112698675 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C131872663 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C141071460 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C144133560 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C188816634 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C2779234561 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C2780129039 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C2909718597 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C3020128735 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C54355233 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C71924100 @default.
- W1877309905 hasConceptScore W1877309905C86803240 @default.
- W1877309905 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W1877309905 hasLocation W18773099051 @default.
- W1877309905 hasOpenAccess W1877309905 @default.
- W1877309905 hasPrimaryLocation W18773099051 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W2020173513 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W2031615899 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W2036714541 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W2037748478 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W2113485405 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W2135329844 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W2769999524 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W3137419777 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W3212541925 @default.
- W1877309905 hasRelatedWork W4236587835 @default.
- W1877309905 hasVolume "5" @default.
- W1877309905 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1877309905 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1877309905 magId "1877309905" @default.
- W1877309905 workType "article" @default.