FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W18788492> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W18788492 startingPage "39" @default.
• W18788492 abstract "ABSTRACT This article analyzes e-commerce business models and the costs they incur to build brand awareness and customer loyalty. In the new competitive environment of the Internet with lower availability of capital, these costs represent an important area of weakness for new e-commerce ventures. Some firms have been successful in addressing the issue with the technique of viral marketing. This approach uses personal relationships and referrals to build affinity groups that support and promote new brands without the costly expenditure of traditional media advertising. The approach capitalizes on many of the same dynamics as direct selling and network marketing -- the leveraging of personal relationships and word of mouth recommendations to build customer awareness and loyalty. The article analyzes the parallels between the widely accepted business model of direct selling, particularly as it has been updated during the 1990s into network marketing, and the new model of e-commerce. It suggests opportunities for e-commerce to learn from and incorporate key features of this well-tested approach to building a brand through personal circles of influence. Introduction The collapse of the Nasdaq, beginning in the first quarter of 2000, and the subsequent failure of many dot com enterprises, has called into question the validity and substance of the business model that many of these firms used to launch what they trumpeted as the e-commerce revolution. It also raises the larger question of how businesses will realistically exploit the undeniable potential of Internet technology. Traditional retailers can profitably use the Internet as a new channel to build incremental volume. Mass merchandisers like Walmart and Sears who operate across a broad product range, as well as focused marketers like the Pottery Barn, L. L. Bean and the Gap have all built powerful click and mortar business models that supplement and complement sales in stores and mail order. The Internet has also proven to be a powerful tool in supply chain management for firms selling to the corporate B2B market. But the heart of the e-commerce Revolution -- using on line sales to replace traditional marketing channels at a lower cost, with more customization and higher levels of customer convenience -- has not produced a business model that allows firms to translate Internet productivity into profits. Technology empowers consumers with a much broader range of information and gives firms access to more consumers at dramatically lower cost and higher frequency. But, until it generates profits as well as page views, the Internet will not realize its potential to improve lives. No profits, no progress. The quest for a viable e-commerce business model is in full swing. This paper analyzes the current, first generation business models used in e-commerce, considering them from a micro-economic viewpoint. Why has the rapid growth of on line marketing -- approaching one trillion dollars in the United States and projected to double by 2004 -- generated little or no profit, even for the market leaders? It is necessary to look at the cost of attracting customers and, more importantly, of securing repeat business. The structure of the market, the experience of the first generation firms competing in this market, and the basic cost dynamics are key to uncovering the weakness of this dot com business model. By comparing the dot com experience with other industries where technology has taken off rapidly, and with other marketing plans, the paper seeks to shed light on other approaches to entrepreneurship and business building that may have relevance to e-commerce. The market structure of the Internet economy approaches the economic model of perfect competition, characterized by low barriers to entry (and exit) with a consequent proliferation of firms and products, rapid diffusion of knowledge to both consumers and competitors, low product or service differentiation and brand loyalty. …" @default.
• W18788492 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W18788492 creator A5091509603 @default.
• W18788492 date "2001-03-22" @default.
• W18788492 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W18788492 title "Convergence of Business Models" @default.
• W18788492 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W18788492 type Work @default.
• W18788492 sameAs 18788492 @default.
• W18788492 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W18788492 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W18788492 hasAuthorship W18788492A5091509603 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C140781008 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C146897074 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C165696696 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C187008535 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C2775922551 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C2776967331 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C4216890 @default.
• W18788492 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C110875604 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C112698675 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C136764020 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C140781008 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C144133560 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C146897074 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C162324750 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C162853370 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C165696696 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C187008535 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C21547014 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C2775922551 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C2776967331 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C2780378061 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C38652104 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C41008148 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C4216890 @default.
• W18788492 hasConceptScore W18788492C518677369 @default.
• W18788492 hasLocation W187884921 @default.
• W18788492 hasOpenAccess W18788492 @default.
• W18788492 hasPrimaryLocation W187884921 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W1528261924 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W153445087 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W1555192191 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W1573931001 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W1976453422 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W1998528413 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W2014396496 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W2058564678 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W2106262189 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W2119652953 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W2188163669 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W2333032681 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W2989662075 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W3099870061 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W3122318329 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W3124328918 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W3171576890 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W3208867217 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W82307769 @default.
• W18788492 hasRelatedWork W901860559 @default.
• W18788492 isParatext "false" @default.
• W18788492 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W18788492 magId "18788492" @default.
• W18788492 workType "article" @default.