FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W188218321> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W188218321 abstract "This thesis broadly explores evidence-based practice (EBP) in mental health, with a particular focus on dissemination and implementation of research evidence regarding family intervention in psychosis.Chapter one comprises a review of evidence-based practice in mental health, including the uptake of evidence-based practice, the effects of training, research dissemination and implementation strategies. A brief narrative review is presented followed by a systematic review examining uptake of evidence-based therapies by mental health practitioners. Eleven papers were selected for review and were measured against the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (von Elm, Altman, Egger, Pocock, Gotzsche & Vandenbroucke, 2007). Following this, conclusions regarding the current evidence and areas which need to be developed are discussed, primarily the need for standardised measures, an indication of clinical change and provision of follow-up studies.Chapter Two comprises an empirical paper intended to be submitted to the journal ‘Implementation Science’. The aim was to address some of the issues identified in Chapter One, namely the use of standardised measures and the measure of a change in clinical practice. Mixed methods were used to assess attitudes to EBP in Trainee Clinical Psychologists and the effect that different dissemination methods had on their attitudes to a specific facet of EBP, family interventions in psychosis. A total of 104 trainee clinical psychologists from 23 UK training programmes participated in the online study, and were randomly allocated to one of four conditions.i. ‘Minimal information’: Participants viewed a brief summary of a fictitious service-user with psychosis, this served as the baseline condition.ii. ‘Case study’: Participants viewed a detailed case study describing the use of family interventions with a fictitious service-user with psychosisiii. ‘Research summary’: Participants viewed a detailed research summary showing research into the effectiveness of family interventions in psychosisiv. ‘Combined’, participants viewed both the case study and research summaryFollowing this, participants completed a survey of their experience with different therapies and demographic information and a standardised measure of attitudes to EBP. Participants then viewed the minimal information about the fictitious client, followed by the summary specified in the condition they were allocated to. Participants then completed a questionnaire designed to assess their attitudes to family intervention in psychosis and their willingness to engage in further training. Responses to these served as the dependent variables. Participants were also given the opportunity to give their own views on the use of family interventions in clinical practice. Data were analysed using MANOVA and multiple regression, with thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) employed for the qualitative data. Participants who viewed both case and research information showed a greater willingness to train than those who viewed research information alone.Chapter Three, the concluding section, consists of a general discussion of the research, focusing on the findings and their relation to previous findings in the area, the implications of the findings for research and clinical training and practice, as well as strengths and limitations of the research. The main limitations identified were the lack of a follow-up and the suitability of willingness to train as a measure in trainee clinical psychologists. Recommendations for future research in this area are made. Following the general discussion section a proposal for a follow-on study, extending the current study and improving the methodology is presented. Lastly, the research is presented in the form of a report intended for submission to ‘Clinical Psychology Forum’." @default.
• W188218321 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W188218321 creator A5060137386 @default.
• W188218321 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W188218321 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W188218321 title "Dissemination methods and attitudes to family intervention for psychosis in trainee clinical psychologists" @default.
• W188218321 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W188218321 type Work @default.
• W188218321 sameAs 188218321 @default.
• W188218321 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W188218321 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W188218321 hasAuthorship W188218321A5060137386 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C141330323 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C2993392932 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W188218321 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C118552586 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C134362201 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C141330323 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C142724271 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C15744967 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C17744445 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C189708586 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C199539241 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C204787440 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C23131810 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C27415008 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C2779473830 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C2780665704 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C2993392932 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C509550671 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C70410870 @default.
• W188218321 hasConceptScore W188218321C71924100 @default.
• W188218321 hasLocation W1882183211 @default.
• W188218321 hasOpenAccess W188218321 @default.
• W188218321 hasPrimaryLocation W1882183211 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W1528239998 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W1660194024 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W1989300161 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W1989357180 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2137928701 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2147530782 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2154794911 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2160587635 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2168660520 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2515673299 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2520669096 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2749959514 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2764169779 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2791726195 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W290367998 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2952180777 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2972866440 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W2974980266 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W3159318208 @default.
• W188218321 hasRelatedWork W3144445094 @default.
• W188218321 isParatext "false" @default.
• W188218321 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W188218321 magId "188218321" @default.
• W188218321 workType "dissertation" @default.