Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1885040849> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W1885040849 abstract "The famous English case of William Dunlop – charged by the murder of Julie Hogg – serves as a great example for the important doctrine of criminal procedure law known classically as ‘ne bis in idem’ or known as ‘double jeopardy’ in Anglo-Saxon laws i.e. the legal system of the United States. Dunlop was originally acquitted even after two jury procedures in 1991; as such, he was declared ‘not guilty’ in the charges. However, Dunlop later confessed to lying in this procedure, and admitted that he was in fact the one who had killed the young girl. In 2005, the Court of Appeals reopened the Dunlop file – based on the motion by the Chief Prosecutor at the time – and on June 16th, 2006, William Dunlop was sentenced to life in prison for the murder of Julie Hogg. An intriguing question may emerge for lawyers: does the decision made by the Court of Appeals violate the prohibition of double jeopardy? Based on English Law currently in effect, the answer is ‘no’. The present study attempts to compare the application of the ‘double jeopardy’ doctrine in the legal system of the United States, as well as in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. In addition, the study also provides an outlook on the legal system of Great-Britain. The interesting aspect of the latter is the fact that although Great-Britain is a party to the European Convention on Human Rights, it has yet to sign its relevant protocol. Similarly although it is a member of the European Union it is not a member of the Schengen Area. Consequently, this situation provides a very good example of the national regulation and application of the ‘double jeopardy’ principle. Besides the above the study provides a brief presentation of the history and development of the ‘ne bis in idem/double jeopardy’ principle, followed by the presentation of the ‘philosophy’ (legal policy principles) behind the principle." @default.
- W1885040849 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1885040849 creator A5022283233 @default.
- W1885040849 date "2012-11-01" @default.
- W1885040849 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W1885040849 title "Double Jeopardy in a Global Context: A Comparative Analysis of the Right not to be Tried or Punished Twice for the Same Criminal Offense" @default.
- W1885040849 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W1885040849 type Work @default.
- W1885040849 sameAs 1885040849 @default.
- W1885040849 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1885040849 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W1885040849 hasAuthorship W1885040849A5022283233 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C2776119841 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C2780230267 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C2780656516 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C504945742 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C166957645 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C169437150 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C17744445 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C199539241 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C2776119841 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C2776211767 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C2779343474 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C2780230267 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C2780656516 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C504945742 @default.
- W1885040849 hasConceptScore W1885040849C95457728 @default.
- W1885040849 hasLocation W18850408491 @default.
- W1885040849 hasOpenAccess W1885040849 @default.
- W1885040849 hasPrimaryLocation W18850408491 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W1492849369 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W1583212034 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W1597958332 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W204803967 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W2240134023 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W2255354187 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W2270850204 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W2341329121 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W2477584220 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W283924550 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W2894293236 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W3121858808 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W3124827522 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W3124936989 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W340090407 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W50924258 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W52695545 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W946216018 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W954167146 @default.
- W1885040849 hasRelatedWork W3123171444 @default.
- W1885040849 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1885040849 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1885040849 magId "1885040849" @default.
- W1885040849 workType "article" @default.