FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1885123695> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1885123695 endingPage "626" @default.
• W1885123695 startingPage "626" @default.
• W1885123695 abstract "We thank Dr Paladini for his interest in our article. The literature search for our systematic review ended in 2012, as described in the methods, explaining why his more recent paper was not included. With regard to his first observation, we believe that the external validity of the results of his series may be limited by patient selection due to referral bias, and by the fact that a single operator performed and interpreted all ultrasound examinations. In fact, Dr Paladini states that fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was offered ‘only if the expert neurosonologist deems it necessary or advisable’, and this resulted in 16% of cases undergoing MRI1. However, the specific criteria that make a fetal brain MRI either necessary or advisable are not reported. For instance, an ‘inconclusive or uncertain finding’ on neurosonography for one sonographer could be definitively conclusive and certain for another sonographer. There are no standard criteria in the literature with which to identify accurately and reproducibly pregnancies that may benefit from fetal brain MRI. With regard to the second comment, experts in fetal medicine performed the studies included in our review, in referral centers. We described in detail the heterogeneity in protocols used for ultrasound examinations, but this is by no means the only source of heterogeneity. Therefore, we are unable to limit the systematic review to apples or oranges, as we do not have an objective way to make this distinction, and we would be simply cherry-picking instead. As for the definition of ‘advanced neurosonographic assessment by an expert fetal neurologist’, which is without doubt what Dr Paladini personally performs, we would like to reassure readers that, in reality, the Italian national guidelines suggest more modestly that it is not justified to perform fetal MRI ‘without first obtaining an ultrasound evaluation done by an expert operator’2. The final point made by Dr Paladini is that an expert in fetal medicine should indicate MRI; with this we concur fully. We believe that the advantage of a systematic review is to try to report objectively what is known and unknown in the literature. To this end, our systematic review illustrates accurately the limitations of the literature. A. C. Rossi† and F. Prefumo*‡ †Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale della Murgia, Bari, Italy; ‡Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy *Correspondence. (e-mail: [email protected])" @default.
• W1885123695 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1885123695 creator A5009004025 @default.
• W1885123695 creator A5079157772 @default.
• W1885123695 date "2015-04-24" @default.
• W1885123695 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1885123695 title "Reply: fruit and fetal brain MRI - the cherry-picking approach to systematic reviews" @default.
• W1885123695 cites W1790103741 @default.
• W1885123695 cites W2072062834 @default.
• W1885123695 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14831" @default.
• W1885123695 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25914396" @default.
• W1885123695 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1885123695 type Work @default.
• W1885123695 sameAs 1885123695 @default.
• W1885123695 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1885123695 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1885123695 hasAuthorship W1885123695A5009004025 @default.
• W1885123695 hasAuthorship W1885123695A5079157772 @default.
• W1885123695 hasBestOaLocation W18851236951 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C2778941581 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C126838900 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C143409427 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C143753070 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C17744445 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C189708586 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C19527891 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C199539241 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C2776135927 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C2778941581 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C2779473830 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C512399662 @default.
• W1885123695 hasConceptScore W1885123695C71924100 @default.
• W1885123695 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1885123695 hasLocation W18851236951 @default.
• W1885123695 hasLocation W18851236952 @default.
• W1885123695 hasOpenAccess W1885123695 @default.
• W1885123695 hasPrimaryLocation W18851236951 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W2019231036 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W2039649766 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W2155867211 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W2467326329 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W2798310738 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W3032760841 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W3170934895 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W4231279736 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W4306849910 @default.
• W1885123695 hasRelatedWork W4360810369 @default.
• W1885123695 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W1885123695 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1885123695 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1885123695 magId "1885123695" @default.
• W1885123695 workType "article" @default.