FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1895681791> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1895681791 endingPage "668" @default.
• W1895681791 startingPage "643" @default.
• W1895681791 abstract "IntroductionThe Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) framework is being developed to reduce carbon emissions into the atmosphere due to deforestation and forest degradation. Phelps et al. (2010) have, however, raised concerns that REDD could cause the recentralization of forest lands in so-called developing through providing central governments and international players with increased control over forests, thus potentially seriously setting back efforts to institute more locally sensitive decentralized models of forest management. They argue that over the last quarter century many non-industrialized countries have adopted more decentralized forms of resource management, hard fought reforms that have given many local forest users increased rights and responsibilities, at least over forests of lower economic value.While the extent to which locals have been allocated rights and responsibilities in association with forest management varies considerably (see Hall et al. 2011; Ribot 1999; 2004; McCarthy 2001; Badola 1998; Fisher 1998; Vandergeest 1996), at least the rhetoric of the desirability to substantially increase the participation of local users in forest management has advanced considerably in recent decades. This has frequently translated into more agency for local people, although there are often important trade-offs between sustainability and local benefits when decentralization occurs (Jagger et al. 2005). In addition, devolving control in cases when local elites are able to capture benefits at the expense of other local resource users can be counter-productive (Barr et al. 2006; McCarthy 2001; 2004; Hutchcroft 2001), thus necessitating careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding particular cases. Still, overall efforts to devolve power to local resource users have resulted in better forest protection and increased benefits for local people (Persha et al. 2011; Agrawal and Ostrom 2008; Agrawal and Gibson 1999; Ribot 1999).Crucially, the shift to increasing local forest management rights and responsibilities has largely been driven by two main arguments. The first is ethical, or rights-based, and is founded on the recognition that local people have often been severely and unfairly disenfranchised by governments, and that locals therefore deserve to gain significant rights and responsibilities over the lands and forests that they have long depended on for their livelihoods. This position asserts that governments and others have a moral obligation to rectify the serious wrongs that have been imposed on local and especially indigenous forest users, and that empowering people is the only ethically appropriate thing to do, regardless of whether such changes lead to improved forest management or not.1)The second argument is fundamentally pragmatic, and is grounded on the fact that past efforts by distant actors, both governmental and private, to effectively manage forest resources have often failed to ensure sustainable management and protection (Ribot 1999; Agrawal and Ostrom 2008). Many have argued that decentralizing management and empowering local users to significantly benefit from forest resources is often the most efficient and cost-effective way to manage forests. Being participatory and transparent is particularly crucial (Cortula and Mayers 2009; Somanathan et al. 2009). Those taking this position frequently point out that central governments, especially in poorer countries, rarely have the resources or convictions to effectively protect forests from various threats (Ribot 1999; 2004; Ostrom 1990), although government recognition and support for local people in gaining rights to use and manage natural resources frequently remains critical, as without it limiting or excluding users may not be feasible (Ostrom 1990; Baird and Flaherty 2005).At present the increased global focus on utilizing REDD (including REDD+) to fund forest protection represents a potential threat to the trend in forest management decentralization, as argued by Phelps et al. …" @default.
• W1895681791 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1895681791 creator A5032069067 @default.
• W1895681791 date "2014-12-25" @default.
• W1895681791 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1895681791 title "Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) and Access and Exclusion: Obstacles and Opportunities in Cambodia and Laos" @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1548442532 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1862973122 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1880291026 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1922271465 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1954872608 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1963964473 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1970639832 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1978675886 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1980708481 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W1987951261 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2000009285 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2011341975 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2025940149 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2036691115 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2047195491 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2049487430 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2056616376 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2057550456 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2058967873 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2060201468 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2089671874 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2099548663 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2104647174 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2106530591 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2125014478 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2143651082 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2145587543 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2146826537 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2155508296 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2160065655 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2175723801 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2318660846 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W2904783308 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W604629585 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W3111341971 @default.
• W1895681791 cites W972203494 @default.
• W1895681791 doi "https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.3.3_643" @default.
• W1895681791 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1895681791 type Work @default.
• W1895681791 sameAs 1895681791 @default.
• W1895681791 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1895681791 countsByYear W18956817912014 @default.
• W1895681791 countsByYear W18956817912016 @default.
• W1895681791 countsByYear W18956817912019 @default.
• W1895681791 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1895681791 hasAuthorship W1895681791A5032069067 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C113052830 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C132651083 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C136810230 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C198428699 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C2775841215 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C2777399953 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C2778405918 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C2779007161 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C28631016 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C2994081031 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C526734887 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C107826830 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C108170787 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C113052830 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C118518473 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C132651083 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C136810230 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C144024400 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C144133560 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C162324750 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C166957645 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C175605778 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C18903297 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C198428699 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C199360897 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C205649164 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C2775841215 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C2777399953 @default.
• W1895681791 hasConceptScore W1895681791C2778405918 @default.

• next