Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1898609251> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W1898609251 startingPage "109" @default.
- W1898609251 abstract "In 'Everson v. Board of Education', Justice Wiley Rutledge observed that - '[n]o provision of the Constitution is more closely tied to or given content by its generating history than the religious clause of the First Amendment. It is at once the refined product and the terse summation of that history. Scholars and activists argue about the relevance or irrelevance of the Supreme Court's use of history in general and the extent to which Justices are good historians. These debates have been particularly furious with respect to the Court's use of history in Religion Clause cases. Although broad claims are often made about the Court's use of history in these cases, they are either unsupported generalities or extrapolations from a careful reading of only a handful of the Court's many Free Exercise and Establishment Clause cases In this essay, I offer a systematic analysis of every Religion Clause case decided by the Supreme Court through 2009. I begin by providing original data drawn from the Court's Religion Clause cases that clearly and succinctly address the extent to which Justices have used history in their Religion Clause opinions and, when they do, to whom or what they appeal. I then look at the distribution of Religion Clause cases over time and consider whether there are patterns with respect to the Court's use of history. As well, I examine individual Justices to determine the extent to which they write opinions in Religion Clause cases, and how often they use history. In this discussion I define what it means to be -liberal or - conservative in Religion Clause cases and place Justices on an ideological continuum based upon every vote cast in these cases from 1940 to 2009. I follow this with an examination of the extent to which jurisprudential liberals and conservatives differ in their use of history. In the essay's penultimate section, I offer a narrative account of the Court's use of history in Religion Clause cases with an emphasis on opinions where Justices consciously reflect on the relevance or irrelevance of history." @default.
- W1898609251 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1898609251 creator A5019502205 @default.
- W1898609251 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W1898609251 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W1898609251 title "Jeffersonian Walls and Madisonian Lines: The Supreme Court's Use of History in Religion Clause Cases" @default.
- W1898609251 cites W1566127647 @default.
- W1898609251 cites W1972095617 @default.
- W1898609251 cites W2188075237 @default.
- W1898609251 cites W2335067730 @default.
- W1898609251 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W1898609251 type Work @default.
- W1898609251 sameAs 1898609251 @default.
- W1898609251 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W1898609251 countsByYear W18986092512013 @default.
- W1898609251 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1898609251 hasAuthorship W1898609251A5019502205 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C104636517 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C2777553895 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C2778323131 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C50688660 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C61192294 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConcept C87501996 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C104636517 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C144024400 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C17744445 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C199539241 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C2776154427 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C2777553895 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C2778272461 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C2778323131 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C2778449503 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C2994536602 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C50688660 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C61192294 @default.
- W1898609251 hasConceptScore W1898609251C87501996 @default.
- W1898609251 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W1898609251 hasLocation W18986092511 @default.
- W1898609251 hasOpenAccess W1898609251 @default.
- W1898609251 hasPrimaryLocation W18986092511 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W1490597409 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W1534225681 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W1534543927 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W1550065983 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W1556323083 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W1574587401 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W2092920221 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W2153402945 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W2259648878 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W244842935 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W24490473 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W2604698267 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W311632158 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W3121611894 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W3123135022 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W3156858014 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W414482037 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W50813678 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W598773879 @default.
- W1898609251 hasRelatedWork W633573229 @default.
- W1898609251 hasVolume "5" @default.
- W1898609251 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1898609251 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1898609251 magId "1898609251" @default.
- W1898609251 workType "article" @default.