FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1907949942> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1907949942 abstract "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address the following assertions: first, the Laboratories of Practice (LoP) promotes professional growth. Second, the LoP enhances understanding of program design and delivery. Finally, the LoP has a financial value both to the organization where the LoP took place and to the university. The paper examines the responses of program candidates from two cohorts and the community partners they served to a survey focussed on the LoPs. Design/methodology/approach – In summer 2012, Cohort 1 students and their mentors completed a survey, a milestone paper, and reflective papers. LoP mentors (critical friends (CF)) were invited to give feedback on the LoP and the program candidate. In summer 2013, data were gathered via online surveys, milestone paper, and reflection papers from two program cohorts who experienced a LoP. In total, 48 students participated in the research. Findings – In relation to assertion no. 1, both the community partners’ and the students’ experiences with respect to the LoP made clear that the fieldwork has yielded positive outcomes. Students have found that they were able to draw from the classroom learnings to address the problems of practice in the real world setting. They reflected on lessons learned about themselves as well as the process itself, which sometimes resulted in redefining the problem at hand. Finally, the goals that were accomplished by the students during the LoP experience provided them with immense satisfaction, next steps, and, in some cases, the affirmation of their choice to participate in a professional practice doctorate. In relation to assertion no. 2, LoP data have been used by faculty to refine and improve the program and the LoP experience itself. In relation to assertion no. 3, while field mentors (CF) indicate that the services provided by the students during their LoP were invaluable and provided significant insights and improvements in their workplace, it was a challenge to assign a specific financial value to the LoP. Research limitations/implications – In terms of the internal validity of the study, it is possible that the findings are weakened due to the reliance on doctoral candidates and their mentors from one professional practice doctorate, and the potential for recall bias. In the future, a longitudinal or multiple source research study would have a much stronger internal validity. In terms of external validity, the study can only be reasonably generalized to doctoral students in professional practice doctorates grounded by CPED principles. Practical implications – While each LoP is highly individual, the process does require the candidates to reflect on their professional practice and their professional growth. CF facilitate reflection and conceptual thought, thereby developing professional practice. LoPs appear to be of value both to the individual and to their organizational context. Social implications – Students’ and LoP employers’ survey responses, established and/or furthered excellent relationships with many community partners, and provided quantifiable evidence of accomplishments. Originality/value – Many professional practice doctorates are struggling with what a LoP in the field should and could look like and the benefits of a LoP. This is an innovative paper as it explains the development and learning from one program that is becoming identified with its LoP. It is likely that university faculty will be interested in the design of the LoP and the value of the LoP as indicated by the survey results to the student, mentor, faculty, and program." @default.
• W1907949942 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1907949942 creator A5028692108 @default.
• W1907949942 creator A5032244277 @default.
• W1907949942 creator A5084817108 @default.
• W1907949942 date "2015-09-14" @default.
• W1907949942 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1907949942 title "Laboratories of practice" @default.
• W1907949942 cites W1844092299 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W1970370842 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W1977129703 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W1977469360 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W1982455115 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2039282895 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2071944599 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2146691185 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2150587481 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2161590208 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2171380100 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2413775157 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2472330956 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W2499530870 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W274227200 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W319431376 @default.
• W1907949942 cites W4210702550 @default.
• W1907949942 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-01-2014-0006" @default.
• W1907949942 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1907949942 type Work @default.
• W1907949942 sameAs 1907949942 @default.
• W1907949942 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1907949942 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1907949942 hasAuthorship W1907949942A5028692108 @default.
• W1907949942 hasAuthorship W1907949942A5032244277 @default.
• W1907949942 hasAuthorship W1907949942A5084817108 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C120060458 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C40422974 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C120060458 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C15744967 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C199360897 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C205649164 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C40422974 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C41008148 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C509550671 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C58640448 @default.
• W1907949942 hasConceptScore W1907949942C71924100 @default.
• W1907949942 hasLocation W19079499421 @default.
• W1907949942 hasOpenAccess W1907949942 @default.
• W1907949942 hasPrimaryLocation W19079499421 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W126168508 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W1485168784 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W1529023627 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2023243372 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2188048145 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2583490646 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2583600268 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2597449720 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2602317178 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2613884469 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2753863389 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2766055731 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2782728920 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2887300429 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2922012995 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2944482082 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2963449079 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2966673575 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W3200022874 @default.
• W1907949942 hasRelatedWork W2490260680 @default.
• W1907949942 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1907949942 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1907949942 magId "1907949942" @default.
• W1907949942 workType "article" @default.