FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W190887329> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W190887329 startingPage "339" @default.
• W190887329 abstract "In Richard Marsh's 1897 thriller The Beetle, dandified London scientist Sydney Atherton tests his own Weapon of Mass Destruction--Atherton's Magic Vapour, which is capable of decimating enemy soldiers en masse--on what he imagines is the cat of Paul Lessingham. A reformist liberal MP who, in his youth, was a dilatory traveler in the Middle East (specifically Cairo), Lessingham is not merely the target of Atherton's ostensible jealousy over Marjorie Lindon, the MP's fiancee, but also the object of Atherton's strong homosocial admiration, even homoerotic attraction. Marsh's novel, most critics seem to agree, documents British imperialism's attempts to imagine as the queer, the female, and the nonwhite in order to rationalize their extermination or education (that is, subjugation). Yet the novel's imperialistic impulses toward those ends work both to justify and to undermine themselves: violence directed at the nonnormative only reveals the queer underpinnings of the dominant culture (urban, male, heterosexual, white/British, positivistic). A monstrous and mesmeric insect-like creature of ambiguous gender and indeterminate though definitively non-Western race, the Beetle is a priestess of the atavistic Egyptian cult of Isis who travels to London, as a number of critics have noted, on a project of reverse colonization. (1) The Beetle's motives are personal as well as political. Seeking to seduce and abscond with white British women as a method of possessing and subverting British power, the Beetle also wants recompense for a personal injury: her own attempted murder at the hands of Paul Lessingham, whom the Beetle had seduced and held prisoner in Cairo twenty years earlier, as well as Lessingham's double rejection--of the priestess/Beetle as desired sexual object and of the Oriental power of mesmerism. Near the end of the novel, the Beetle, who repeatedly dominates, probes, and penetrates male characters physically and mentally, apparently dies in a massive train wreck. The evidence (blotches of liquid that seem to be blood from creature of the cat species [319]) might seem inconclusive. Still, the explosion that occurs some time later in the Sudan--turning up debris from an ancient temple dedicated to Isis along with fragments of what seemed bodies [...] neither of men nor women, but of creatures of some monstrous growth (319)--appears to imply the Beetle's demise, if not necessarily her eternal extinction. Whereas a number of critics read this climax as indeterminate, we read the Beetle's extinction as being pretty final (as final as others read its escape). (2) Likewise, the novel seems unable, despite its best efforts, to disconnect destruction of the female and the filthy from the homosocial/homoerotic relationships underwritten by those very abject categories. The sublimated (or not so sublimated) homoerotic energies circulating between the male characters (politicians, dandies, and scientists) continually return to the pursuit and/or destruction of the feminine, the nonhuman, and the queer (nonheterosexual, nonnormative). Using London as the stage on which to set these acts of violence a setting mirrored in late-1870s Cairo, where Paul Lessingham first falls under the spell of the Oriental Other the novel's panic about the danger posed by the Other, the female, and the homoerotic renders it a consummately relevant text for understanding how these same anxieties circulate through our own era and culture. In fine, our argument investigates three interconnected aspects of the novel, some of which have been critically examined, others not. First, to what extent does Marjorie Lindon represent the New Woman? How much anxiety does she sincerely generate in the novel's male characters and, by extension, Victorian hegemonic culture? Are there other female characters--Dora Grayling, for instance--who might be more or equally threatening in terms of agency? Might Marjorie and Dora in fact be seen as somewhat traditional, or at least figures whose threatening valences are safely neutralized by the end of the novel? …" @default.
• W190887329 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W190887329 creator A5022493785 @default.
• W190887329 creator A5033216353 @default.
• W190887329 date "2012-09-22" @default.
• W190887329 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W190887329 title "Orgies of Nameless Horrors: Gender, Orientalism, and the Queering of Violence in Richard Marsh's the Beetle" @default.
• W190887329 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W190887329 type Work @default.
• W190887329 sameAs 190887329 @default.
• W190887329 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W190887329 countsByYear W1908873292016 @default.
• W190887329 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W190887329 hasAuthorship W190887329A5022493785 @default.
• W190887329 hasAuthorship W190887329A5033216353 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C2778584255 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C2780493273 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C518914266 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C56273599 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W190887329 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C104317684 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C107993555 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C121332964 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C124952713 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C142362112 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C144024400 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C163258240 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C185592680 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C195244886 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C2778584255 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C2780493273 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C518914266 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C55493867 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C56273599 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C62520636 @default.
• W190887329 hasConceptScore W190887329C95457728 @default.
• W190887329 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W190887329 hasLocation W1908873291 @default.
• W190887329 hasOpenAccess W190887329 @default.
• W190887329 hasPrimaryLocation W1908873291 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W10821771 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W126826845 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W1577805991 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W1935342290 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W1978287524 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2029831011 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2067399776 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2085527832 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2147587957 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2161378723 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2215021742 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2346497830 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2401300566 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2517596833 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2592818489 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2599755010 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W287243341 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W31585945 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W1135587 @default.
• W190887329 hasRelatedWork W2188487082 @default.
• W190887329 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W190887329 isParatext "false" @default.
• W190887329 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W190887329 magId "190887329" @default.
• W190887329 workType "article" @default.