Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1911115319> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1911115319 endingPage "1" @default.
- W1911115319 startingPage "1" @default.
- W1911115319 abstract "Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Tobias Enge,l Ayer Botrel,1 Otávio Clark,1 Antônio Carlos Lima Pompeo,2 Francisco Flávio Horta Bretas,2 Marcus Vinicius Sadi,2 Ubirajara Ferreira,2 Rodolfo Borges dos Reis2 1CoBEU and Evidencias, 2Comitê Brasileiro de Estudos em Uro-Oncologia – CoBEU, Brazil Background: The purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and side effect profile of hypofractionated versus conventional external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Methods: Several databases were searched, including Medline, EmBase, LiLACS, and Central. The endpoints were freedom from biochemical failure and side effects. We performed a meta-analysis of the published data. The results are expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The final analysis included nine trials comprising 2702 patients. Freedom from biochemical failure was reported in only three studies and was similar in patients who received hypofractionated or conventional radiotherapy (fixed effect, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88–1.20; P = 0.75), with heterogeneity [χ2 = 15.32, df = 2 (P = 0.0005); I2 = 87%]. The incidence of acute adverse gastrointestinal events was higher in the hypofractionated group (fixed effect, RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.45–2.81; P < 0.0001). We also found moderate heterogeneity on this analysis [χ2 = 7.47, df = 5 (P = 0.19); I2 = 33%]. Acute genitourinary toxicity was similar among the groups (fixed effect, RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95–1.49; P = 0.13), with moderate heterogeneity [χ2 = 5.83, df = 4 (P = 0.21); I2 = 31%]. The incidence of all late adverse events was the same in both groups (fixed effect, gastrointestinal toxicity, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79–1.72, P = 0.44; and acute genitourinary toxicity, RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.80–1.68, P = 0.44). Conclusion: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer was not superior to conventional radiotherapy and showed higher acute gastrointestinal toxicity in this meta-analysis. Because the number of published studies is still small, future assessments should be conducted to clarify better the true role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. Keywords: hypofractionated, radiotherapy, prostate cancer, systematic review, acute radiation effects" @default.
- W1911115319 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1911115319 creator A5002629084 @default.
- W1911115319 creator A5003423421 @default.
- W1911115319 creator A5004076063 @default.
- W1911115319 creator A5021087019 @default.
- W1911115319 creator A5029793417 @default.
- W1911115319 creator A5086970907 @default.
- W1911115319 creator A5087593615 @default.
- W1911115319 date "2013-03-01" @default.
- W1911115319 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
- W1911115319 title "Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
- W1911115319 cites W1581993345 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W186268426 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W1872421448 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W1983095373 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W1989762435 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W1993681878 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2004515940 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2006081762 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2010476323 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2011204537 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2012932483 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2013304077 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2015981950 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2017285222 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2020242089 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2023807811 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2026077821 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2035071859 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2040755747 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2042484962 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2043945205 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2049082373 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2050744051 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2052055950 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2054899405 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2057806510 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2069830565 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2071365490 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2073187039 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2074378530 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2075642745 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2078753880 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2080109178 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2093867637 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2103608035 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2107328434 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2115675646 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2122326560 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2130574795 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2132433125 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2140164571 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2144574555 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2147188169 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2150780724 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2157823046 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2158648133 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2159598747 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2160406420 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2160691516 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2165244734 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2418977552 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2467613370 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2560340727 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W2760434161 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W3022903699 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W52224008 @default.
- W1911115319 cites W93183664 @default.
- W1911115319 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/ce.s41178" @default.
- W1911115319 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3596128" @default.
- W1911115319 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23526383" @default.
- W1911115319 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W1911115319 type Work @default.
- W1911115319 sameAs 1911115319 @default.
- W1911115319 citedByCount "19" @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192013 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192014 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192015 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192016 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192017 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192018 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192019 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192022 @default.
- W1911115319 countsByYear W19111153192023 @default.
- W1911115319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1911115319 hasAuthorship W1911115319A5002629084 @default.
- W1911115319 hasAuthorship W1911115319A5003423421 @default.
- W1911115319 hasAuthorship W1911115319A5004076063 @default.
- W1911115319 hasAuthorship W1911115319A5021087019 @default.
- W1911115319 hasAuthorship W1911115319A5029793417 @default.
- W1911115319 hasAuthorship W1911115319A5086970907 @default.
- W1911115319 hasAuthorship W1911115319A5087593615 @default.
- W1911115319 hasBestOaLocation W19111153191 @default.
- W1911115319 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W1911115319 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1911115319 hasConcept C143998085 @default.