FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W191322295> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W191322295 abstract "Clarke et al. (2014) provide a persuasive case for role of a theory-of-change model to guide nature of curriculum development work embodying both a theoretical and empirical knowledge foundation. They illuminate components of their model, which were used to design and test efficacy of a Tier 2 intervention for students who met their criteria for at-risk identification of mathematics difficulties. Their model of change is well grounded in research findings regarding effective instructional delivery practices for struggling students, as well as critical mathematical competencies related to foundational concepts and skills, which purportedly are necessary for later mathematics success. Unfortunately, as Clarke et al. (2014) aptly point out, findings from national assessments (e.g., The Nation's Report Card; National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2013) indicate an alarming rate of poor performance by students who continue to struggle with learning mathematical knowledge. Undoubtedly, a significant number of children demonstrate poor mathematics achievement (Swanson, 2006) that is persistent and pervasive, with long-term problems associated with mathematics difficulties (Geary, 2004; Griffin & Case, 1997). Recommendations from National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) and Frye et al. (2013) underscore importance of providing early intervention that uses effective instructional practices for at-risk students. For early mathematics interventions, research results are beginning to inform an understanding of types of instructional practices and intensity of interventions that contribute to mathematics performance. Thus, report by Clarke et al. (2014) offers field promising information about a multicomponent intervention for young children who are at risk for mathematics difficulties within a response-to-intervention (RtI) support system. The purpose of this commentary is to expand on theoretical implications underpinning Clarke et al. (2014) intervention study by elaborating on key findings and offering additional insights to situate study in terms of RtI, a theory of change, and future research. RtI Support System and Mathematics Difficulties Clarke et al. (2014) frame their intervention work within an RtI system of support. As such, RtI is operationalized through key components, including providing universal screening to all students to identify those who are most in need of preventative intervention, using validated interventions with high-quality levels of fidelity as part of tiered system of support, and conducting ongoing monitoring of student response to intensive instruction (Fuchs & Vaughn, 2012). Notably, Clarke et al. (2014) acknowledge call of National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) for the development and rigorous evaluation of mathematics curricula, which should be inclusive of domains of Common Core State Standards (2010) for mathematics (CCSSM). Clearly, availability of evidence-based practices and programs for a tiered mathematics support system is a critical component of RtI and requires more research attention from field. Clarke et al. (2014) indicate that, on basis of WWC [What Works Clearinghouse] standards for evaluating program effectiveness (p. X), only four programs could conceivably be integrated into an RtI framework for Tier 1 mathematics instruction; moreover, only two programs (i.e., Bryant, Bryant, Gersten, Scammacca, & Chavez, 2008; Fuchs et al., 2005) suitable for tiered instruction for first graders were identified. More recently, adding to this list of programs targeting Tier 2 first-grade students with mathematics difficulties is early numeracy intervention program (Bryant, Pfannenstiel, & Bryant, 2014). Evidence for this program is based on a pretest-posttest control group design; 139 students were randomly assigned to Tier 2 treatment group and 65 students to comparison group. …" @default.
• W191322295 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W191322295 creator A5082612383 @default.
• W191322295 date "2014-06-01" @default.
• W191322295 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W191322295 title "Tier 2 Intervention for At-Risk First-Grade Students Within a Response-to-Intervention Model of Support" @default.
• W191322295 cites W1919512670 @default.
• W191322295 cites W1933136760 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2001172548 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2054296176 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2057765574 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2058734237 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2074814542 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2093893550 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2104376403 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2114020508 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2120218211 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2139566454 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2142584883 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2155898544 @default.
• W191322295 cites W2163561654 @default.
• W191322295 cites W3115142841 @default.
• W191322295 cites W4243280719 @default.
• W191322295 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2014.12087443" @default.
• W191322295 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W191322295 type Work @default.
• W191322295 sameAs 191322295 @default.
• W191322295 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W191322295 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W191322295 hasAuthorship W191322295A5082612383 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C2775969163 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C2780732545 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C28858896 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W191322295 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C118552586 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C145420912 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C15744967 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C166957645 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C19417346 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C27415008 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C2775969163 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C2780665704 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C2780732545 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C28858896 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C47177190 @default.
• W191322295 hasConceptScore W191322295C95457728 @default.
• W191322295 hasLocation W1913222951 @default.
• W191322295 hasOpenAccess W191322295 @default.
• W191322295 hasPrimaryLocation W1913222951 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W136603107 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W142473226 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W1572752410 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W161133727 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2004226919 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2014655401 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2046528151 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2046702746 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2100273246 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W211021150 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2170804355 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2216491864 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2340043016 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W241010990 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2483744474 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2492610516 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2753878913 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2889900897 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W2997712389 @default.
• W191322295 hasRelatedWork W64497153 @default.
• W191322295 isParatext "false" @default.
• W191322295 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W191322295 magId "191322295" @default.
• W191322295 workType "article" @default.