Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1917892833> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W1917892833 abstract "What are the primary factors favouring the success of coercive diplomacy? Why has U.S. military primacy not translated into greater coercive leverage against asymmetric adversaries? What can account for this paradox in international crises management? This paper investigates these related questions by examining the U.S. use of coercive diplomacy against Libya (1981-2003). Having promoted global radicalism, engaged in terrorism, and pursued weapons of mass destruction (WMD) for years, Libya’s abandonment of its WMD program in 2003 and other key shifts in policy make it the strongest case of coercive diplomacy success since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. This paper explores the concept of coercive diplomacy within the broader framework of bargaining strategies. Following a theoretical and conceptual analysis of the main models of coercive diplomacy, the analytic framework developed by Bruce Jentleson and Christopher Whytock is employed to investigate the three phases of U.S. coercive diplomacy against Libya. It can be determined from this case example that successful strategies of coercive diplomacy require five main components: (1) a proportional, reciprocal, and credible coercive strategy, (2) limited objectives which, do not engage the vital interests of an adversary, (3) strong multilateral support and coalitional coercion, (4) a consideration of target vulnerability (as shaped by its political and economic domestic conditions), and (5) the use of positive inducements to increase an adversary’s motivation to comply. Following a presentation of these analytic conclusions, the final section of the paper discusses implications for both theory and policy. Quels sont les facteurs principaux qui favorisent la reussite de la diplomatie coercitive? La primaute militaire des Etats-Unis, pourquoi n’a-t-elle pas connu plus de succes contre les adversaires plus faibles? Quelle est la cause de ce paradoxe dans la gestion des crises internationales? Cette dissertation cherche a repondre a ces questions en examinant la diplomatie coercitive utilisee par les Etats-Unis contre la Libye (1981 a 2003). Comme la Libye favorisait le radicalisme global, s’engageait dans le terrorisme et recherchait les armes nucleaires pendant des annees, sa cessation du programme nucleaire en 2003 et d’autres renversements de la politique representent le plus grand succes de la diplomatie coercitive depuis la crise des missiles de Cuba en 1962. Cette dissertation explore le concept de la diplomatie coercitive au sein du cadre plus large des strategies de negociation. Cet exemple nous montre que les strategies de negociation reussies exigent cinq elements principaux: (1) une strategie coercitive proportionnelle, reciproque et credible; (2) des objectifs limites qui n’engagent pas les interets essentiels de l’adversaire; (3) un fort soutien multilateral et une coercition de coalition; (4) une consideration de la vulnerabilite de la cible (determinee par des conditions domestiques en politique et economie) et (5) l’usage des incitatifs positifs afin d’augmenter la motivation de se conformer de la part de l’adversaire. Apres la presentation de ces conclusions, la derniere section de l’essai discute les implications pour les theories et la politique." @default.
- W1917892833 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1917892833 creator A5054828725 @default.
- W1917892833 date "2015-04-23" @default.
- W1917892833 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1917892833 title "Coercive Diplomacy A Theoretical and Practical Evaluation" @default.
- W1917892833 cites W1484239706 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W1490505169 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W1970309718 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W1991830428 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W2029201373 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W2066957146 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W2149281907 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W2149361618 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W21574203 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W2325587931 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W2330802950 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W270918587 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W2799882077 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W3122573513 @default.
- W1917892833 cites W643263976 @default.
- W1917892833 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W1917892833 type Work @default.
- W1917892833 sameAs 1917892833 @default.
- W1917892833 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1917892833 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1917892833 hasAuthorship W1917892833A5054828725 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C2777188754 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C2779816988 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C557252395 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C138885662 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C138921699 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C144024400 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C162324750 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C17744445 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C199539241 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C2777188754 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C2779816988 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C41895202 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C557252395 @default.
- W1917892833 hasConceptScore W1917892833C94625758 @default.
- W1917892833 hasLocation W19178928331 @default.
- W1917892833 hasOpenAccess W1917892833 @default.
- W1917892833 hasPrimaryLocation W19178928331 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W1491143858 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W1492384279 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W1502286433 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W1518860232 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W1593398770 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W1970294129 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2043936933 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2049184298 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2056185101 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2060677075 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2076068788 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2239801741 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2330419061 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2610984302 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2737399886 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2914640191 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2936300049 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2954651404 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W2994681136 @default.
- W1917892833 hasRelatedWork W3124823156 @default.
- W1917892833 hasVolume "8" @default.
- W1917892833 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1917892833 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1917892833 magId "1917892833" @default.
- W1917892833 workType "article" @default.