Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1918446412> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1918446412 endingPage "67" @default.
- W1918446412 startingPage "61" @default.
- W1918446412 abstract "Object Spinal surgical outcome studies rely on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements to assess treatment effect. A shortcoming of these questionnaires is that the extent of improvement in their numerical scores lack a direct clinical meaning. As a result, the concept of minimum clinical important difference (MCID) has been used to measure the critical threshold needed to achieve clinically relevant treatment effectiveness. As utilization of spinal fusion has increased over the past decade, so has the incidence of adjacent-segment degeneration following index lumbar fusion, which commonly requires revision laminectomy and extension of fusion. The MCID remains uninvestigated for any PROs in the setting of revision lumbar surgery for adjacent-segment disease (ASD). Methods In 50 consecutive patients undergoing revision surgery for ASD-associated back and leg pain, PRO measures of back and leg pain on a visual analog scale (BP-VAS and LP-VAS, respectively), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Summaries (SF-12 PCS and MCS, respectively), and EuroQol-5D health survey (EQ-5D) were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. The following 4 well-established anchor-based MCID calculation methods were used to calculate MCID: average change; minimum detectable change (MDC); change difference; and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis for the following 2 separate anchors: health transition item (HTI) of the SF-36 and satisfaction index. Results All patients were available for 2-year PRO assessment. Two years after surgery, a statistically significant improvement was observed for all PROs (mean changes: BP-VAS score [4.80 ± 3.25], LP-VAS score [3.28 ± 3.25], ODI [10.24 ± 13.49], SF-12 PCS [8.69 ± 12.55] and MCS [8.49 ± 11.45] scores, and EQ-5D [0.38 ± 0.45]; all p < 0.001). The 4 MCID calculation methods generated a range of MCID values for each of the PROs (BP-VAS score, 2.3–6.5; LP-VAS score, 1.7–4.3; ODI, 6.8–16.9; SF-12 PCS, 6.1–12.6; SF-12 MCS, 2.4–10.8; and EQ-5D, 0.27–0.54). The area under the ROC curve was consistently greater for the HTI anchor than the satisfaction anchor, suggesting this as a more accurate anchor for MCID. Conclusions Adjacent-segment disease revision surgery–specific MCID is highly variable based on calculation technique. The MDC approach with HTI anchor appears to be most appropriate for calculation of MCID after revision lumbar fusion for ASD because it provided a threshold above the 95% CI of the unimproved cohort (greater than the measurement error), was closest to the mean change score reported by improved and satisfied patients, and was not significantly affected by choice of anchor. Based on this method, MCID following ASD revision lumbar surgery is 3.8 points for BP-VAS score, 2.4 points for LP-VAS score, 6.8 points for ODI, 8.8 points for SF-12 PCS, 9.3 points for SF-12 MCS, and 0.35 quality-adjusted life-years for EQ-5D." @default.
- W1918446412 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5010883015 @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5013456593 @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5024268828 @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5027033204 @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5028017729 @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5029505495 @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5044818716 @default.
- W1918446412 creator A5090842836 @default.
- W1918446412 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W1918446412 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W1918446412 title "Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease" @default.
- W1918446412 cites W1563749042 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W1583848026 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W1964685529 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W1967126262 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W1976347566 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W1991899643 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2001589248 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2009691381 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2030147372 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2030430403 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2033425493 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2040987404 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2050302634 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2060886633 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2068680282 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2069700831 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2071782474 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2074027434 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2088893559 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2094528068 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2102560768 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2110368977 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2142494542 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2316581491 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W2917045438 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W4244453275 @default.
- W1918446412 cites W4253703821 @default.
- W1918446412 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.8.spine1194" @default.
- W1918446412 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21962034" @default.
- W1918446412 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W1918446412 type Work @default.
- W1918446412 sameAs 1918446412 @default.
- W1918446412 citedByCount "133" @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122012 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122013 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122014 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122015 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122016 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122017 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122018 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122019 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122020 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122021 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122022 @default.
- W1918446412 countsByYear W19184464122023 @default.
- W1918446412 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5010883015 @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5013456593 @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5024268828 @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5027033204 @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5028017729 @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5029505495 @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5044818716 @default.
- W1918446412 hasAuthorship W1918446412A5090842836 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C111278954 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2776237627 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2776501849 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2780091945 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C3019006561 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConceptScore W1918446412C111278954 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConceptScore W1918446412C118552586 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConceptScore W1918446412C126322002 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConceptScore W1918446412C141071460 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConceptScore W1918446412C14184104 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConceptScore W1918446412C142724271 @default.
- W1918446412 hasConceptScore W1918446412C159110408 @default.