FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1921115199> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1921115199 abstract "The aim of the study presented in this article is to analyse the discriminant factors that have an influence on the use of communities of practice by primary and specialist healthcare professionals (physicians and nurses) for information sharing. Obtaining evidence from an ex-ante analysis to determine what factors explain healthcare professionals’ clinical community of practice use allows aspects of its use to be identified. A theoretical model based on a modified technology acceptance model was used as the analysis tool, and a discriminant analysis was performed. An ad-hoc questionnaire was designed and sent to a study population of 357 professionals from the Badalona-Sant Adrià de Besòs Primary Care Service in Catalonia, Spain, which includes nine primary care centres and three specialist care centres. The study sample was formed by the 166 healthcare professionals who responded. The results revealed three main drivers for engagement in a CoP: First, for the whole sample, perceived usefulness for reducing costs associated with clinical practice was the factor with the greatest discriminant power that distinguished between users and non-users, followed by perceived usefulness for improving clinical practice quality, and lastly habitual social media website and application use. Turning to the two sub-samples of healthcare professions (physicians and nurses, respectively), we saw that the usefulness stemming from community of practice use changed. There were differences in the levels of motivation of healthcare professionals with regards to their engagement with CoP. While perceived usefulness for reducing costs associated with clinical practice was the main factor for the physicians, perceived usefulness of the Web 2.0 platform use for communication for improving clinical practice quality and perceived ease of use were the main factors for the nurses. In the context of communities of practice, the perception of usefulness of Web 2.0 platform use for communication is determined by organisational, technological and social factors. Specifically, the position that professionals have within the healthcare structure and particularly the closer healthcare professionals’ activity is to patients and their professional experience of using social networks and ICTs are crucial to explaining the use of such platforms. Public policies promoting Web 2.0 platform use for communication should therefore go beyond the purely technological dimension and consider other professional and social determinants." @default.
• W1921115199 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1921115199 creator A5004066549 @default.
• W1921115199 creator A5005791594 @default.
• W1921115199 creator A5053399252 @default.
• W1921115199 creator A5057873573 @default.
• W1921115199 creator A5062772303 @default.
• W1921115199 creator A5063245235 @default.
• W1921115199 creator A5091361038 @default.
• W1921115199 date "2015-06-01" @default.
• W1921115199 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1921115199 title "Understanding the discriminant factors that influence the adoption and use of clinical communities of practice: the ECOPIH case" @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1583335711 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1791587663 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1935227354 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1974108202 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1977775666 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1981718629 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1985686294 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W1992598552 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2001938200 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2002238615 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2003038264 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2033943395 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2039991270 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2042386526 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2054497491 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2054984345 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2059873837 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2065502371 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2067960261 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2068525104 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2079538778 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2081508199 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2083367548 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2092259073 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2100379340 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2104026855 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2112485413 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2117252377 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2141726488 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2146217571 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2146601354 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2146778331 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2156739230 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2161185381 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2163492263 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2168569455 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2168783216 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2170171316 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W2411634791 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W4210702550 @default.
• W1921115199 cites W4237826058 @default.
• W1921115199 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1036-4" @default.
• W1921115199 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4566431" @default.
• W1921115199 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26358037" @default.
• W1921115199 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1921115199 type Work @default.
• W1921115199 sameAs 1921115199 @default.
• W1921115199 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W1921115199 countsByYear W19211151992018 @default.
• W1921115199 countsByYear W19211151992020 @default.
• W1921115199 countsByYear W19211151992021 @default.
• W1921115199 countsByYear W19211151992022 @default.
• W1921115199 countsByYear W19211151992023 @default.
• W1921115199 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1921115199 hasAuthorship W1921115199A5004066549 @default.
• W1921115199 hasAuthorship W1921115199A5005791594 @default.
• W1921115199 hasAuthorship W1921115199A5053399252 @default.
• W1921115199 hasAuthorship W1921115199A5057873573 @default.
• W1921115199 hasAuthorship W1921115199A5062772303 @default.
• W1921115199 hasAuthorship W1921115199A5063245235 @default.
• W1921115199 hasAuthorship W1921115199A5091361038 @default.
• W1921115199 hasBestOaLocation W19211151991 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C137992405 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C145642194 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C518773536 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C137992405 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C138816342 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C145642194 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C159110408 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C160735492 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C162324750 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C185592680 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C198531522 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C43617362 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C50522688 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C509550671 @default.
• W1921115199 hasConceptScore W1921115199C512399662 @default.

• next