FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W192138082> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W192138082 abstract "The case study is evaluated: the resulting product and its design and the way the method has been used by the product creation team. The evaluation is done by means of the predefined hypothesis and criteria. Distribution This article or presentation is written as part of the Gaudi project. The Gaudi project philosophy is to improve by obtaining frequent feedback. Frequent feedback is pursued by an open creation process. This document is published as intermediate or nearly mature version to get feedback. Further distribution is allowed as long as the document remains complete and unchanged. March 6, 2013 status: finished version: 0.9 1. product is a commercial success 2. product family is sustainable commercially successful 3. architects benefit from deploying submethods in multi-view framework 4. project leaders, product managers and engineers are able to use the outcome of the submethods + sales volume + selling price + margin + time to market multi-view framework F CA submethods ? integration of the method results used by stakeholders for many purposes too late too abstract ? derived from Figure 18.3 + 3 products + 10 releases in 5 years derived from Figure 14.10 qualities checklist CR story telling reasoning derived from sections 18.4.1 18.4.2 18.4.3 derived from sections 18.4.4 18.4.5 derived from Figure 18.7 OK doubt legend Hypothesis and criterions as basis for the evaluation criteria 1. product is a commercial success 2. product family is sustainable commercially successful 3. architects benefit from deploying submethods in multi-view framework 4. project leaders, product managers and engineers are able to use the outcome of the submethods hypothesis A rich collection of submethods fitting in a multi-view framework complemented with reasoning methods enables successful architecting of technology and software intensive complex systems in heterogeneous environments by means of generic insights grounded in specific facts CAFCR submethods qualities checklists story telling CAFCR quality needles threads of reasoning medical imaging workstation multi-modality multi-application multi-release small system level specifications measurements, source code, log files films, images, et cetera Evaluation of the Architecting Method 2 Gerrit Muller version: 0.9 March 6, 2013 AREhypothesisCriterions Evaluation of the product operational feedback customer feedback C ustomer objectives A pplication F unctional ++ usability film layout ++ film efficiency + operator efficiency printing + ease of auto-printing concurrent viewing and auto-printing + throughput + image quality + interoperability URF interoperability vascular + sales volume + selling price + margin + time to market + manufacturability + option handling ~ network installation return on investment problem ~ doubt + good or ++ very good legend Evaluation of the Architecting Method 3 Gerrit Muller version: 0.9 March 6, 2013 AREproductEvaluation Evaluation of the design C onceptual R ealization + notification + Objective-C + standard workstation + X bypass + Unix dependency structure interface management ~ modularity ~ distance internal and external information model ~ some bloating due to over-genericity ~ property handling lots of discussions about : language choice (why not C++) windowing system platform re-use + processing pipeline + graphics + UI toolbox + PMSnet + database engine + memory management + DB based communication + SW keys + OIT problem ~ doubt + good based upon technology assessment in Technology Improvement Plan legend Evaluation of the Architecting Method 4 Gerrit Muller version: 0.9 March 6, 2013 AREdesignEvaluation Coverage of submethods C ustomer objectives A pplication F unctional C onceptual R ealization key drivers value chain business models suppliers c ontext diagram stakeholders and concerns entity relationship models dynamic models c ase descriptions commercial decomposition service decomposition goods flow decomposition function and feature specifications performance external interfaces standards construction decomposition functional decomposition designing with multiple decompositions execution architecture internal interfaces performance start up shutdown integration plan work breakdown safety reliability security budget benchmarking performance analysis granularity determination value and cost safety analysis reliability analysis security analysis explicitly addressed addressed only implicitly not addressed coverage based on documentation status of first product release legend Evaluation of the Architecting Method 5 Gerrit Muller version: 0.9 March 6, 2013 AREmethodCoverage Documentation of qualities in 1996 usability attractiveness responsiveness image quality wearability storability transportability usable safety security reliability robustness integrity reliable throughput or productivity effective serviceability configurability installability serviceable liability testability traceability standards compliance liable ecological footprint contamination noise disposability ecological reproducibility predictability consistent efficient resource utilisation cost of ownership cost price power consumption consumption rate (water, air, chemicals, et cetera) size, weight accuracy down to earth attributes manufacturability logistics flexibility lead time logistics friendly evolvability portability upgradeability extendibility maintainability future proof interoperable connectivity 3 rd party extendible implicit in other documents in separate document legend Evaluation of the Architecting Method 6 Gerrit Muller version: 0.9 March 6, 2013 AREqualitiesDocumentation Coverage profile of qualities" @default.
• W192138082 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W192138082 creator A5019573869 @default.
• W192138082 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W192138082 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W192138082 title "Evaluation of the Architecting Method" @default.
• W192138082 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W192138082 type Work @default.
• W192138082 sameAs 192138082 @default.
• W192138082 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W192138082 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W192138082 hasAuthorship W192138082A5019573869 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C110121322 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C19351080 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C774472 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W192138082 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C110121322 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C111919701 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C119857082 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C126838900 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C127413603 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C134306372 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C144133560 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C15744967 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C162853370 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C180747234 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C19351080 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C195094911 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C21547014 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C2524010 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C2777601897 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C2779356329 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C33923547 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C41008148 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C71924100 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C774472 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C90673727 @default.
• W192138082 hasConceptScore W192138082C98045186 @default.
• W192138082 hasLocation W1921380821 @default.
• W192138082 hasOpenAccess W192138082 @default.
• W192138082 hasPrimaryLocation W1921380821 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W1530197208 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W1899103551 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2004586348 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2011692548 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2022839897 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2077516006 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2101885005 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2125267897 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2128821162 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2131893660 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2143284475 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2147170347 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2166064576 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2301280702 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2387422730 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2547370643 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2784057843 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W2905798240 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W316605347 @default.
• W192138082 hasRelatedWork W72851385 @default.
• W192138082 isParatext "false" @default.
• W192138082 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W192138082 magId "192138082" @default.
• W192138082 workType "article" @default.