FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1923179905> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1923179905 endingPage "440" @default.
• W1923179905 startingPage "429" @default.
• W1923179905 abstract "Previous articleNext article No AccessEssay ReviewsParadigm Lost? A Review Symposium Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912. Thomas S. Kuhn Martin J. Klein, Abner Shimony, and Trevor J. PinchMartin J. Klein Search for more articles by this author , Abner Shimony Search for more articles by this author , and Trevor J. Pinch Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 70, Number 3Sep., 1979 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/352287 Views: 17Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1979 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jeroen van Dongen In Europe, Physics in Perspective 22, no.11 (Mar 2020): 3–25.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-020-00252-2Adam Timmins Between History and Philosophy of Science: The Relationship between Kuhn’s Black-Body Theory and Structure, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 9, no.22 (Jul 2019): 371–387.https://doi.org/10.1086/704374Antonino Drago Koyré’s Revolutionary Role in the Historiography of Science, (Nov 2017): 123–141.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61712-1_7Michael Nauenberg Max Planck and the birth of the quantum hypothesis, American Journal of Physics 84, no.99 (Sep 2016): 709–720.https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4955146Massimiliano Badino Deconstructing Planck, (Jun 2015): 81–110.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20031-6_4Adam Timmins Why Was Kuhn’s Structure More Successful than Polanyi’s Personal Knowledge?, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3, no.22 (Jul 2015): 306–317.https://doi.org/10.1086/671347Francisco Savall Alemany, Josep Lluís Domènech Blanco, Joaquín Martínez Torregrosa, , La introducción del concepto de fotón en bachillerato, Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física 35, no.22 (Jun 2013).https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-11172013000200019David R. Topper Einstein: From Zürich to Bern & the Annus Mirabilis, (Aug 2012): 15–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4782-5_3Thomas Nickles Dynamic Robustness and Design in Nature and Artifact, (Jan 2012): 329–360.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5_14M. Badino The odd couple: Boltzmann, Planck and the application of statistics to physics (1900-1913), Annalen der Physik 18, no.2-32-3 (Mar 2009): 81–101.https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200810336M. Badino The odd couple: Boltzmann, Planck and the application of statistics to physics (1900–1913), Annalen der Physik 521, no.2-32-3 (Mar 2009): 81–101.https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.200952102-303Vasso Kindi The Relation of History of Science to Philosophy of Science in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and Kuhn's later philosophical work, Perspectives on Science 13, no.44 (Dec 2005): 495–530.https://doi.org/10.1162/106361405775466117Jochen Büttner, Jürgen Renn, Matthias Schemmel Exploring the limits of classical physics: Planck, Einstein, and the structure of a scientific revolution, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, no.11 (Mar 2003): 37–59.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00031-XKlaus Hentschel Nordamerikanische Impulse der Physikgeschichte, Physik Journal 56, no.1111 (Feb 2013): 67–70.https://doi.org/10.1002/phbl.20000561116 Book reviews, Annals of Science 45, no.55 (Aug 2006): 535–554.https://doi.org/10.1080/00033798800200381John H. Perkins A Conceptual Framework, (Jan 1982): 163–182.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3998-4_6Kurt Bayertz Krise und Revolution, (Jan 1981): 52–76.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03907-1_5 Einstein and Quantum Theory: The Early Years, (): 21–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71520-9_2" @default.
• W1923179905 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1923179905 creator A5016297360 @default.
• W1923179905 creator A5029982418 @default.
• W1923179905 creator A5047510691 @default.
• W1923179905 date "1979-09-01" @default.
• W1923179905 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1923179905 title "Paradigm Lost? A Review Symposium<i>Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912</i>. Thomas S. Kuhn" @default.
• W1923179905 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/352287" @default.
• W1923179905 hasPublicationYear "1979" @default.
• W1923179905 type Work @default.
• W1923179905 sameAs 1923179905 @default.
• W1923179905 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W1923179905 countsByYear W19231799052012 @default.
• W1923179905 countsByYear W19231799052013 @default.
• W1923179905 countsByYear W19231799052015 @default.
• W1923179905 countsByYear W19231799052016 @default.
• W1923179905 countsByYear W19231799052017 @default.
• W1923179905 countsByYear W19231799052020 @default.
• W1923179905 countsByYear W19231799052022 @default.
• W1923179905 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1923179905 hasAuthorship W1923179905A5016297360 @default.
• W1923179905 hasAuthorship W1923179905A5029982418 @default.
• W1923179905 hasAuthorship W1923179905A5047510691 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConcept C85659524 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConceptScore W1923179905C111472728 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConceptScore W1923179905C121332964 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConceptScore W1923179905C138885662 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConceptScore W1923179905C17744445 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConceptScore W1923179905C199539241 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConceptScore W1923179905C29598333 @default.
• W1923179905 hasConceptScore W1923179905C85659524 @default.
• W1923179905 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1923179905 hasLocation W19231799051 @default.
• W1923179905 hasOpenAccess W1923179905 @default.
• W1923179905 hasPrimaryLocation W19231799051 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W1986924498 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W1998007261 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W2357567944 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W2393088916 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W2394478647 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W2473870544 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W2972001530 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W4200129494 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W4282940524 @default.
• W1923179905 hasRelatedWork W4380635180 @default.
• W1923179905 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W1923179905 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1923179905 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1923179905 magId "1923179905" @default.
• W1923179905 workType "article" @default.