FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1928837339> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1928837339 endingPage "23" @default.
• W1928837339 startingPage "3" @default.
• W1928837339 abstract "In this paper we relate the competence of 207 prospective teachers to build statistical graphs with their graph reading level. The graphs produced in their written reports in a statistical project, where the teachers had to compare three pairs of distributions are firstly classified in four different levels, according to their semiotic complexity. Secondly, the participants’ interpretations of these graphs are classified according to Curcio’s (1989) graph reading levels and thirdly the participant’s conclusion about the research question posed in the project are examined. The semiotic complexity levels in the graphs produced by the prospective teachers was, in general, high enough to solve the task proposed; however, the correct conclusion on the question posed in the project was only reached by a minority of prospective teachers, because many of them were unable to read the graphs produced by themselves at the “reading behind the data” level. Higher levels of graph semiotic complexity favoured the teachers’ interpretation of the graph, since higher semiotic level graphs also corresponded to higher combined percentage of “reading beyond data” and “reading between data” levels in the participants’ written reports. Higher levels of graph semiotic complexity also favoured the reaching of a conclusion about the research question. No differences were observed according the variables compared. Keywords: statistical graphs, semiotic complexity, graph interpretation and comprehension. Complexite des graphiques statistiques et niveaux de lecture : une etude avec des enseignants Dans cet article, nous rapportons la competence de 207 futurs enseignants a construire des graphiques statistiques avec leur niveau de lecture graphique. Les graphiques produits dans leurs rapports ecrits dans un projet statistique, ou les enseignants ont du comparer trois paires de distributions sont classes en quatre niveaux differents, en fonction de leur complexite semiotique. Deuxiemement, les interpretations de ces graphiques des participants sont classees selon Curcio (1989) apres les niveaux de lecture graphique et, enfin, la conclusion du participant sur la question de recherche posee dans le projet est examinee. Les niveaux de complexite semiotique dans les graphiques produits par les futurs enseignants est, en general, assez haut pour resoudre la tâche proposee ; toutefois, la conclusion correcte sur la question posee dans le projet a ete formulee seulement par une minorite d'enseignants, parce que beaucoup d'entre eux etaient incapables de les graphiques produits par eux-memes au niveau lire derriere les donnees. Des niveaux superieurs de complexite semiotique graphique ont favorise l'interpretation du graphique, puisque les graphiques de niveau semiotique les plus eleves correspond egalement a un pourcentage superieur des niveaux «lire au-dela des donnees» et «lire entre les donnees« dans les rapports ecrits des participants. Des niveaux plus eleves de complexite semiotique dans le graphique ont egalement favorise l'atteinte d'une conclusion sur la question de recherche. Aucune difference n'a ete pas observee selon les variables comparees. Mots-cles : graphiques statistiques, complexite, niveaux de lecture, enseignants." @default.
• W1928837339 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1928837339 creator A5031301897 @default.
• W1928837339 creator A5052260858 @default.
• W1928837339 creator A5088767003 @default.
• W1928837339 creator A5091619300 @default.
• W1928837339 date "2015-04-23" @default.
• W1928837339 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1928837339 title "STATISTICAL GRAPHS COMPLEXITY AND READING LEVELS: A STUDY WITH PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS" @default.
• W1928837339 cites W130941092 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W1496130232 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W15164227 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W1517488050 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W1606479027 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W1980469504 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2026070826 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2030294794 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2032681916 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2062664430 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2063784334 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2098397175 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2119557786 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2125115272 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2129885125 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2137480887 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2150779316 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2189372270 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2244097791 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2553937736 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2558884625 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W39354318 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W421379723 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W47319097 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W52017899 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W7234495 @default.
• W1928837339 cites W2185841834 @default.
• W1928837339 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1928837339 type Work @default.
• W1928837339 sameAs 1928837339 @default.
• W1928837339 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1928837339 countsByYear W19288373392020 @default.
• W1928837339 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1928837339 hasAuthorship W1928837339A5031301897 @default.
• W1928837339 hasAuthorship W1928837339A5052260858 @default.
• W1928837339 hasAuthorship W1928837339A5088767003 @default.
• W1928837339 hasAuthorship W1928837339A5091619300 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C132525143 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C139997677 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C2778780117 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C511192102 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C100521375 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C114614502 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C132525143 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C138885662 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C139997677 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C145420912 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C15744967 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C2778780117 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C33923547 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C41008148 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C41895202 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C511192102 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C554936623 @default.
• W1928837339 hasConceptScore W1928837339C77805123 @default.
• W1928837339 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1928837339 hasLocation W19288373391 @default.
• W1928837339 hasOpenAccess W1928837339 @default.
• W1928837339 hasPrimaryLocation W19288373391 @default.
• W1928837339 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W1928837339 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1928837339 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1928837339 magId "1928837339" @default.
• W1928837339 workType "article" @default.