Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1934594744> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1934594744 endingPage "47" @default.
- W1934594744 startingPage "37" @default.
- W1934594744 abstract "When pooled for extraction as a bulk sample, the DNA within morphologically unidentifiable fossil bones can, using next-generation sequencing, yield valuable taxonomic data. This method has been proposed as a means to rapidly and cost-effectively assess general ancient DNA preservation at a site, and to investigate temporal and spatial changes in biodiversity; however, several caveats have yet to be considered. We critically evaluated the bulk bone metabarcoding (BBM) method in terms of its: (i) repeatability, by quantifying sampling and technical variance through a nested experimental design containing sub-samples and replicates at several stages; (ii) accuracy, by comparing morphological and molecular family-level identifications; and (iii) overall utility, by applying the approach to two independent Holocene fossil deposits, Bat Cave (Kangaroo Island, Australia) and Finsch's Folly (Canterbury, New Zealand). For both sites, bone and bone powder sub-sampling were found to contribute significantly to variance in molecularly identified family assemblage, while the contribution of library preparation and sequencing was almost negligible. Nevertheless, total variance was small. Sampling over 80% fewer bones than was required to morphologically identify the taxonomic assemblages, we found that the families identified molecularly are a subset of the families identified morphologically and, for the most part, represent the most abundant families in the fossil record. In addition, we detected a range of extinct, extant and endangered taxa, including some that are rare in the fossil record. Given the relatively low sampling effort of the BBM approach compared with morphological approaches, these results suggest that BBM is largely consistent, accurate, sensitive, and therefore widely applicable. Furthermore, we assessed the overall benefits and caveats of the method, and suggest a workflow for palaeontologists, archaeologists, and geneticists that will help mitigate these caveats. Our results show that DNA analysis of bulk bone samples can be a universally useful tool for studying past biodiversity, when integrated with existing morphology-based approaches. Despite several limitations that remain, the BBM method offers a cost-effective and efficient way of studying fossil assemblages, offering complementary insights into evolution, extinction, and conservation." @default.
- W1934594744 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5008706611 @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5017777704 @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5019306347 @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5035975421 @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5040083928 @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5047395104 @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5057536575 @default.
- W1934594744 creator A5072363399 @default.
- W1934594744 date "2015-11-01" @default.
- W1934594744 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W1934594744 title "A critical evaluation of how ancient DNA bulk bone metabarcoding complements traditional morphological analysis of fossil assemblages" @default.
- W1934594744 cites W1964350046 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W1972652622 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W1977899163 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W1979060637 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W1984240476 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W1985777822 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2006465310 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2013058449 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2015746859 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2020200409 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2028562110 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2038440774 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2039133821 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2044120020 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2047246368 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2047620251 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2054681444 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2055043387 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2063580733 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2064714051 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2068425665 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2070479548 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2072970694 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2074095376 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2076509952 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2077153641 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2080283023 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2087008771 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2093933590 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2095901358 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2098869000 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2099546198 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2101462556 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2108042431 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2111813513 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2112202085 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2116895571 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2119105175 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2124351063 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2124850594 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2128880918 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2132543522 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2133687131 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2136482257 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2136879569 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2137634037 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2138142128 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2138193360 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2141599418 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2149415648 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2151920427 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2152823863 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2154597917 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2160023232 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2161645441 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2162527419 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2166708513 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2170725655 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2171022855 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W2171204139 @default.
- W1934594744 cites W4244818997 @default.
- W1934594744 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.09.014" @default.
- W1934594744 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W1934594744 type Work @default.
- W1934594744 sameAs 1934594744 @default.
- W1934594744 citedByCount "29" @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442016 @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442017 @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442018 @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442019 @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442020 @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442021 @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442022 @default.
- W1934594744 countsByYear W19345947442023 @default.
- W1934594744 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5008706611 @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5017777704 @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5019306347 @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5035975421 @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5040083928 @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5047395104 @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5057536575 @default.
- W1934594744 hasAuthorship W1934594744A5072363399 @default.
- W1934594744 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
- W1934594744 hasConcept C144024400 @default.