Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1937261285> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 83 of
83
with 100 items per page.
- W1937261285 endingPage "288" @default.
- W1937261285 startingPage "263" @default.
- W1937261285 abstract "Recently, the issues of socioeconomic freedom have been a crucial concern as well as a popular rhetoric in the Korean public sphere. The free-lunch referendum of the City of Seoul and a legislative discourse over half-price university tuition, for example, have evoked heated debates across the nation. Along this line of public discourse, the term “the democratization of economy” even became a buzzword in the 2012 presidential race. It is important to recognize that the question of the democratization of the economy is a legal question. Irrespective to which stances one takes, these recent legal and political controversies invite us to delve into legal philosophical questions involved. What is the duty of a State in regard to redistribution? On a deeper analysis, what is the purpose of a State? Is the policy of democratization of the economy violating individual rights of citizens? Or is it guaranteeing them? No doubt, both Nozick and Rawls apparently prioritize the idea of liberty. Then, why do they have such a different view in regard to the question of redistribution? In this short analysis it is pointed that the perception of the relationship between State and individual seems to be starkly different. Especially when those two are seen in light of Immanuel Kant and Thomas Hobbes the difference becomes apparent. Note that though Nozick claims to be in the tradition of John Locke, Nozick’s emphasis on the monopoly of force and the perception of a zero-sum relationship between the State and individual rights are more apparent if it is seen in comparison with Thomas Hobbes. On the other hand, Rawls does not see the relationship between the State and individual rights in opposition. Rather he sees State as a vessel which could realize individual rights. However, it has been pointed that if it is seen from the perspective of the purpose of why liberty should be guaranteed by the State, a similarity between Rawls and Nozick could be identified. By taking the Isaiah Berlin’s distinction between the negative and positive liberty, it could be argued that both Rawls and Nozick defends the negative and positive liberty thesis. However, Nozick needs to answer how the least well-off in society could also be able to realize the positive liberty just as easily as the well-off. Moreover, it is not just the matter of the discrepancy of property, but individuals natural and social contingencies. Nozick seems to be silent on these issues. There is no reason for us to take either Rawls or Nozick as the answer to the situation the Korean society is facing in regard to the question of redistribution. Yet, their questions and the method to approach the questions seem still relevant." @default.
- W1937261285 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1937261285 creator A5053880702 @default.
- W1937261285 date "2012-11-01" @default.
- W1937261285 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W1937261285 title "Preliminary Philosophical Questions of the “Democratization of the Economy”" @default.
- W1937261285 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W1937261285 type Work @default.
- W1937261285 sameAs 1937261285 @default.
- W1937261285 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1937261285 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1937261285 hasAuthorship W1937261285A5053880702 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C1370556 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C17058734 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C197487636 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C2779103253 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C2781127519 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C74080474 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C11413529 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C1370556 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C138885662 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C138921699 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C144024400 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C162324750 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C17058734 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C17744445 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C190253527 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C197487636 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C199539241 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C2779103253 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C2781127519 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C34447519 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C41008148 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C41895202 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C48103436 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C555826173 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C74080474 @default.
- W1937261285 hasConceptScore W1937261285C94625758 @default.
- W1937261285 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W1937261285 hasLocation W19372612851 @default.
- W1937261285 hasOpenAccess W1937261285 @default.
- W1937261285 hasPrimaryLocation W19372612851 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W1485135613 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W196039396 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2035230823 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2078613119 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2085297153 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2142122121 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2158920675 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2161987448 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2181083341 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2225688619 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2234396369 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2241742799 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2269198251 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W2491968560 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W3124860114 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W3146977002 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W3203902245 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W4003967 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W569351277 @default.
- W1937261285 hasRelatedWork W3123252940 @default.
- W1937261285 hasVolume "53" @default.
- W1937261285 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1937261285 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1937261285 magId "1937261285" @default.
- W1937261285 workType "article" @default.