FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W193840364> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W193840364 startingPage "1315" @default.
• W193840364 abstract "The Appointments Clause(1) requires that the President and the Senate each have a role the selection of senior federal officials. As such, it is an example of the checks and balances that characterizes the U.S. political system which there is a separation of powers between the various branches of government. The Appointments Clause need not and should not be interpreted to impinge on the power of the as a nation to conduct a modern foreign trade policy.In this comment on Mr. Morrison's article,(2) I wish to make essentially three points: First, the dispute settlement provisions of Chapter 19 of the States-Canada Free Trade Agreement(3) (FTA) do not violate even a strict reading of the Appointments Clause. Second, if a court deemed the constitutionality of the Chapter 19 procedures to be a close question under the Appointments Clause, there is ample precedent for finding them to be constitutional because of their connection with foreign affairs, where the Supreme Court has traditionally been less concerned with separation of powers issues. Finally, upholding these provisions is consistent with and reinforces representative democracy.I. THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE AND CHAPTER 19 OF THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENTChapter 19 of the FTA permits a Canadian or U.S. person involved an antidumping (AD) or countervailing duty (CVD) investigation to challenge a final decision therein by the Commerce Department or the International Trade Commission (or by the comparable Canadian authorities) before a binational panel.(4) Binational panels are composed of five individuals: two from the States, two from Canada, with the fifth from one or the other.(5) The first two U.S. members are normally selected by the Trade Representative (USTR) from a previously established roster of potential candidates, subject to a Canadian right to object to four proposed panel members. The first two Canadian members are analogously chosen. The fifth person is selected by agreement of the USTR and her Canadian counterpart.(6)The panel so selected hears the parties' arguments the case and decides, based upon the administrative record, whether the challenged determination by the relevant administrative agency was in accordance with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the importing country!.(7) The panel's review is intended to replace judicial review of such determinations by U.S. or Canadian courts.(8) Its decision is final and nonappealable.(9)In his article, Mr. Morrison argues two points: 1) the panel members e! significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States and therefore under Supreme Court precedent must be appointed accordance with the Appointments Clause;(10) and 2) the panelists are not inferior officers under the Morrison v. Olson(11) criteria established by the Court and accordingly they must all be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Even accepting these standards arguendo, Chapter 19's procedures do not violate them.A. PANELS EXERCISE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO THE PTA, NOT U.S. LAWChapter 19 panels do not exercis e! significant authority pursuant to the law of the States. The panel's authority derives exclusively from the Free Trade Agreement itself. It is the FTA, and not U.S. law, that provides when and how panels are to be established, what their functions are, what standard of review they are to apply, the time limits within which they are to complete their tasks and so on.(12) This conclusion is buttressed by a Ninth Circuit case, which the court ruled that, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, members of a council created by an interstate compact were acting pursuant to the compact, not the federal statute approving the compact, and accordingly were not officers of the States.(13) The court reached this conclusion even though the federal statute constrains Council policy-making,. …" @default.
• W193840364 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W193840364 creator A5077793560 @default.
• W193840364 date "1992-10-01" @default.
• W193840364 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W193840364 title "The Appointments Clause And InternationalDispute Settlement Mechanisms: A FalseConflict" @default.
• W193840364 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W193840364 type Work @default.
• W193840364 sameAs 193840364 @default.
• W193840364 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W193840364 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W193840364 hasAuthorship W193840364A5077793560 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C126053111 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2776512386 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2777063073 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2778323131 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2778494135 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2779010840 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2779103253 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C533735693 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C84425819 @default.
• W193840364 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C10138342 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C126053111 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C138885662 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C145097563 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C162324750 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C17744445 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C199539241 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2776512386 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2777063073 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2778137410 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2778272461 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2778323131 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2778494135 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2779010840 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2779103253 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C2994536602 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C41895202 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C533735693 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C84425819 @default.
• W193840364 hasConceptScore W193840364C94625758 @default.
• W193840364 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W193840364 hasLocation W1938403641 @default.
• W193840364 hasOpenAccess W193840364 @default.
• W193840364 hasPrimaryLocation W1938403641 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W113036621 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W1500485840 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W1536427811 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W1559018819 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W1994161273 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W209136928 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2230832777 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2238665797 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2243513607 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2318565172 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2323131604 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W234368942 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2502690705 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2751395125 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W282842692 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W2944750268 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W3132295648 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W3153204748 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W340201820 @default.
• W193840364 hasRelatedWork W575512021 @default.
• W193840364 hasVolume "49" @default.
• W193840364 isParatext "false" @default.
• W193840364 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W193840364 magId "193840364" @default.
• W193840364 workType "article" @default.