Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1946214705> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- W1946214705 endingPage "379" @default.
- W1946214705 startingPage "317" @default.
- W1946214705 abstract "The docking and scoring paradigm can be considered as the combination of two separate problems. The first aspect is a geometric, or more broadly an informatics problem: how can we place a solid object (ligand) within a “cavity“ of another solid (protein) or close to another molecule in a well-defined Cartesian space? The second one is a more intriguing chemical problem: how can we properly predict the free energy of binding considering all the possible contributions involved in biological interactions? There is a wide range of algorithms and approaches used to produce docking poses and, consequently, a wide range of associated scoring functions used to judge the possible poses. In several cases the scoring functions are deeply entwined with the search method and can not be considered separately. In other cases, more than one scoring function is provided in docking programs, each showing different strengths and limitations. Consensus scoring approaches, combining multiple methods into a single metric, have been created to overcome the weaknesses characterizing the different docking algorithms and the associated scoring functions. Correctly predicting not just the binding mode, but also the binding energy, is a primary exigency in all docking simulations and, in particular, in virtual screening applications. Accurate estimation of binding free energy would allow, not only good discrimination between active and inactive molecules, but also among closely related analogs, this latter case being particularly important for drug design. In this chapter we discuss problems related to docking/scoring techniques for in silico screening and we review the most common scoring methods." @default.
- W1946214705 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1946214705 creator A5007894073 @default.
- W1946214705 creator A5031580685 @default.
- W1946214705 creator A5053183150 @default.
- W1946214705 creator A5090089152 @default.
- W1946214705 date "2012-03-27" @default.
- W1946214705 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W1946214705 title "Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening" @default.
- W1946214705 doi "https://doi.org/10.2174/978160805201110703010317" @default.
- W1946214705 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W1946214705 type Work @default.
- W1946214705 sameAs 1946214705 @default.
- W1946214705 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W1946214705 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
- W1946214705 hasAuthorship W1946214705A5007894073 @default.
- W1946214705 hasAuthorship W1946214705A5031580685 @default.
- W1946214705 hasAuthorship W1946214705A5053183150 @default.
- W1946214705 hasAuthorship W1946214705A5090089152 @default.
- W1946214705 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1946214705 hasConceptScore W1946214705C41008148 @default.
- W1946214705 hasLocation W19462147051 @default.
- W1946214705 hasOpenAccess W1946214705 @default.
- W1946214705 hasPrimaryLocation W19462147051 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2096946506 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2130043461 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W1946214705 hasRelatedWork W3004735627 @default.
- W1946214705 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1946214705 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1946214705 magId "1946214705" @default.
- W1946214705 workType "book-chapter" @default.