FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1946356995> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1946356995 endingPage "2227" @default.
• W1946356995 startingPage "2222" @default.
• W1946356995 abstract "Few studies have compared outcomes after meniscus suture repair in patients younger than 40 years versus patients 40 years and older.To document failure rates and long-term outcomes after meniscus suture repair by a single surgeon, using the inside-out technique, at a minimum 10-year follow-up in patients younger than 40 years versus those 40 years and older.Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.This study included all patients 18 years or older who underwent meniscus suture repair with the inside-out technique by a single surgeon between January 1992 and December 2003. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts according to age: <40 years (cohort 1) and ≥40 years (cohort 2). If patients underwent subsequent knee surgery, all subsequent reports, whether performed by the original treating surgeon or by a different surgeon elsewhere, were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers not involved in the primary care of the patients. Reviewers classified surgeries as failures if the subsequent surgery treated the same area of the meniscus as repaired in the index surgery. Patients completed a subjective questionnaire at minimum of 10 years after arthroscopy. Outcomes measures included Lysholm, Tegner, and patient satisfaction with outcome. All data were collected prospectively.The surgeon performed 339 meniscus repairs between 1992 and 2003. The study included 181 knees in 178 patients, who had a mean age of 33 years (range, 18-70 years). Cohort 1 contained 136 knees; 16 patients (12%) were lost to follow-up and 47 (35%) underwent a subsequent knee arthroscopy. Cohort 2 contained 45 knees; 2 patients (4.4%) were lost to follow-up, 3 patients had a total knee arthroplasty, and 12 patients (28%) underwent a subsequent knee arthroscopy. In cohort 1, the meniscus repair failure rate was 5.5% (6/110), and in cohort 2 it was 5.3% (2/38) (P = .927). There was no significant difference in failure rate based on which meniscus was repaired (P = .257), concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (P = .092), or microfracture (P = .674). Average follow-up time for cohort 1 was 16.1 years (range, 10.0-21.9 years), with 82% follow-up (n = 73/89); average follow-up time for cohort 2 was 16.2 years (range, 10.1-21.0 years), with 93% follow-up (n = 28/30). There were no significant differences in outcomes scores after meniscus suture repair based on age cohort or meniscus side, presence of an ACL tear, or concomitant microfracture procedure.Meniscus repair failure rate was not different in patients who were younger than 40 years versus those who were 40 years or older at time of meniscus index surgery. Patients who underwent meniscus suture repair had high function and high patient satisfaction at an average of 16 years after meniscus suture repair, and no differences were seen based on age." @default.
• W1946356995 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1946356995 creator A5019821175 @default.
• W1946356995 creator A5043354423 @default.
• W1946356995 creator A5071195050 @default.
• W1946356995 creator A5073481821 @default.
• W1946356995 creator A5082121542 @default.
• W1946356995 creator A5087326472 @default.
• W1946356995 creator A5088756524 @default.
• W1946356995 date "2015-07-17" @default.
• W1946356995 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1946356995 title "Meniscus Suture Repair" @default.
• W1946356995 cites W1969552102 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W1971184014 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W1989361187 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W1992763054 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2010085227 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2032568902 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2036568969 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2045221153 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2046362994 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2050654941 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2052402889 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2082088348 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2090447965 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2143850919 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2151801387 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2152038842 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2164933897 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2172151487 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2198474910 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2237825119 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W2261237464 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W4252317386 @default.
• W1946356995 cites W83018012 @default.
• W1946356995 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515591260" @default.
• W1946356995 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26187129" @default.
• W1946356995 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1946356995 type Work @default.
• W1946356995 sameAs 1946356995 @default.
• W1946356995 citedByCount "68" @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952016 @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952017 @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952018 @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952019 @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952020 @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952021 @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952022 @default.
• W1946356995 countsByYear W19463569952023 @default.
• W1946356995 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1946356995 hasAuthorship W1946356995A5019821175 @default.
• W1946356995 hasAuthorship W1946356995A5043354423 @default.
• W1946356995 hasAuthorship W1946356995A5071195050 @default.
• W1946356995 hasAuthorship W1946356995A5073481821 @default.
• W1946356995 hasAuthorship W1946356995A5082121542 @default.
• W1946356995 hasAuthorship W1946356995A5087326472 @default.
• W1946356995 hasAuthorship W1946356995A5088756524 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C189178095 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C120665830 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C121332964 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C126322002 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C141071460 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C167135981 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C189178095 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C201903717 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C2777327002 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C2779162959 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C61511704 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C68312169 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C71924100 @default.
• W1946356995 hasConceptScore W1946356995C72563966 @default.
• W1946356995 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W1946356995 hasLocation W19463569951 @default.
• W1946356995 hasLocation W19463569952 @default.
• W1946356995 hasOpenAccess W1946356995 @default.
• W1946356995 hasPrimaryLocation W19463569951 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W1946356995 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W2017295907 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W2162336452 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W2254175846 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W2375318751 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W2380364030 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W3045354968 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W3152031542 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W3199784257 @default.
• W1946356995 hasRelatedWork W4220878674 @default.

• next