Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1952104332> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- W1952104332 endingPage "350" @default.
- W1952104332 startingPage "347" @default.
- W1952104332 abstract "Objectives: We compared our results in the treatment of femoral fractures with reamed or unreamed intramedullary femoral nailing.Methods: Patients who underwent treatment with reamed (n=33; 13 females, 20 males; mean age 38 years; range 18 to 69 years) or unreamed (n=29; 8 females, 21 males; mean age 32 years; range 19 to 60 years) intramedullary nailing for isolated femoral fractures were included. The results were compared with respect to union and complications. All the patients had closed fractures. Follow-up examinations were made in 6th, 10th, and 16th weeks postoperatively.Results: The mean durations for union were 23.4 weeks and 25.5 weeks in patients treated with reamed and unreamed nailing, respectively. The only significant difference between the two treatment groups with respect to complications was the occurrence of ectopic ossification (7 patients, 21.2% vs 8 patients, 27.6%; p<0.05).Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing is the method of choice for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. No significant differences seem to exist between reamed and unreamed nailing with respect to bone healing time and development of complications." @default.
- W1952104332 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1952104332 creator A5011522919 @default.
- W1952104332 creator A5075102210 @default.
- W1952104332 date "2001-01-01" @default.
- W1952104332 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W1952104332 title "Comparison between reamed and unreamed interlocking intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures" @default.
- W1952104332 cites W161639640 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W1928417501 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W1963923607 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2032566196 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2036955838 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2076134510 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2077234790 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2081734167 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2104498383 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2174169633 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2182121637 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W2279287626 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W569608792 @default.
- W1952104332 cites W577180168 @default.
- W1952104332 doi "https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v35i4.1757" @default.
- W1952104332 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W1952104332 type Work @default.
- W1952104332 sameAs 1952104332 @default.
- W1952104332 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1952104332 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1952104332 hasAuthorship W1952104332A5011522919 @default.
- W1952104332 hasAuthorship W1952104332A5075102210 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConcept C2779330695 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConcept C3018712777 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConcept C3018917446 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConcept C92162645 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConceptScore W1952104332C141071460 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConceptScore W1952104332C2779330695 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConceptScore W1952104332C3018712777 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConceptScore W1952104332C3018917446 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConceptScore W1952104332C71924100 @default.
- W1952104332 hasConceptScore W1952104332C92162645 @default.
- W1952104332 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W1952104332 hasLocation W19521043321 @default.
- W1952104332 hasOpenAccess W1952104332 @default.
- W1952104332 hasPrimaryLocation W19521043321 @default.
- W1952104332 hasVolume "35" @default.
- W1952104332 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1952104332 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1952104332 magId "1952104332" @default.
- W1952104332 workType "article" @default.