FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1953282> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1953282 abstract "It is generally assumed in the Australian VET policy community that employer investment in skill development lags well behind that of our major trading partners and competitors and that investment is falling in real terms. Whilst the ABS training expenditure survey suggests that employer investment decreased in the mid-1990s, data from other sources produces a more complex picture of employer training in Australia. Data from the training practices survey, the survey of education and training experience and the business longitudinal survey together show that 80 per cent of Australians receive some form of training from their employers, between a third and half of Australians take part in formal, structured training in the workplace and that over 85 per cent of Australian enterprises employing 10 or more people provide training for their employees. There are a number of approaches that governments around the world, including in Australia, have taken towards to creating a climate that is more conducive to employer investment in skills development. These include voluntaristic approaches such as the Investors in People scheme in the UK, the creation of industry training funds such as those in the Netherlands and the imposition of employer levies. Often these schemes are tightly bound to the social, cultural and economic contexts of their countries making them difficult to reproduce. This paper will discuss some of the major international approaches that have been developed towards increasing employers’ investments in training and their successes and failures. Making employers pay: how do they do it overseas? The issue of improving employer investments in training has been the subject of an ongoing debate in Australia since before the introduction of the Training Guarantee Scheme (TGS) in 1990 and the findings of the first Employer Training Expenditure survey (ABS, 1991). This survey indicated that in 1990 Australian employers spent 2.6% of payroll costs on the training of their employees. However, in recent years, data suggests an apparent decline in training expenditure and in the hours of training provided to employees of Australian enterprises. In the wake of the abolition of the TGS have come claims that employers are reducing their commitment to training and that policies need to be devised to compel them to increase their investments in training (Hall, Buchanan and Considine, 2002). Similar calls have also been heard the UK where employers have been blamed for that country’s apparent poor record on employer training (Keep and Payne, 2002). However, it is by no means clear that Australian employers spend so much less than their counterparts in other developed nations as has been implied. Data from the European Union’s Continuing Vocational Training Survey (CVTS II) show that Australian employers’ expenditure on training lies towards the top end of the normal range of international comparisons at about 1-3 per cent of payroll costs. Table 1 combines data from CVTS II together with data from the American Society for Training and Development’s (ASTD) 2002 International Training Trends report and the ABS to yield a broad comparison of Australia’s training expenditure performance on CVT. Table 1: Percentage of wages and salaries spent by employers on employee training" @default.
• W1953282 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1953282 creator A5070979641 @default.
• W1953282 creator A5081760286 @default.
• W1953282 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W1953282 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1953282 title "Making employers pay: how do they do it overseas?" @default.
• W1953282 cites W101815029 @default.
• W1953282 cites W1555775376 @default.
• W1953282 cites W1736791638 @default.
• W1953282 cites W1984890931 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2015885717 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2030321657 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2124351564 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2163849156 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2168299940 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2168772981 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2563864991 @default.
• W1953282 cites W29933760 @default.
• W1953282 cites W3145408319 @default.
• W1953282 cites W350583944 @default.
• W1953282 cites W2613512444 @default.
• W1953282 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W1953282 type Work @default.
• W1953282 sameAs 1953282 @default.
• W1953282 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1953282 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1953282 hasAuthorship W1953282A5070979641 @default.
• W1953282 hasAuthorship W1953282A5081760286 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C127576917 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C145236788 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C27548731 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C2777211547 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W1953282 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C121332964 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C127576917 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C144133560 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C145236788 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C153294291 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C162324750 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C162853370 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C17744445 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C199539241 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C27548731 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C2777211547 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C39549134 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C50522688 @default.
• W1953282 hasConceptScore W1953282C94625758 @default.
• W1953282 hasLocation W19532821 @default.
• W1953282 hasOpenAccess W1953282 @default.
• W1953282 hasPrimaryLocation W19532821 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W1534903321 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W1537323630 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W1561402976 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W1563050525 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2024381313 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2091191215 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2108475878 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2206353135 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2262832420 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2324643067 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W293341087 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2946178624 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2974290176 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2980916685 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W3021956339 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W623038584 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W830723093 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W84076378 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2386824657 @default.
• W1953282 hasRelatedWork W2467480931 @default.
• W1953282 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1953282 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1953282 magId "1953282" @default.
• W1953282 workType "article" @default.