Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1960088211> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W1960088211 endingPage "92" @default.
- W1960088211 startingPage "79" @default.
- W1960088211 abstract "Abstract. Currently, a more significant added value is created by intellectual rather than physical capital; yet, according to the current standards of accounting, only a minor segment of intellectual capital is presented in financial accounts of enterprises as it usually does not satisfy one of the criteria of property recognition in financial accounting, namely reliable valuation. As a result, there is an increasing demand for novel methods of valuation, enabling enterprises to establish reliably the value of intellectual capital or its specific segments of a given enterprise. A number of scholars have dealt with the methods of intellectual capital valuation. However, their works analyze and classify different methods of intellectual capital valuation, and different criteria of classification are employed; hence, there is no universally accepted opinion on the issue. That is why the aim of this research was to generalize a scheme of methods of intellectual capital valuation. The main methods applied in the present study are the synthesis and generalization of academic writings, including content analysis. The results of the research and its conclusions are based on the analysis of academic investigations conducted by various authors and the resulting publications. Results. The article generalizes the methods of intellectual capital valuation, suggested by a number of scholars, provides comparisons, reveals the multiplicity of the methods, and highlights the unlimited research of the academic field. Besides, the main classifications of methods of intellectual capital valuation are provided, and the applied criteria are defined. Conclusions. It was established that more than sixty different methods for the valuation of the intellectual capital of an enterprise are available. The results of the research show that these methods are classified according to the four following features. Correspondingly, a classification scheme of intellectual capital valuation methods has been developed. It has been established that most methods of intellectual capital valuation are based on scorecard, they assess specific components; of intellectual capital and in the process of valuation do not employ monetary units of measurement. Tis reveals a lack of the studies that focus on the financial aspect of intellectual capital valuation methods.Key words: intellectual capital, valuation, valuation methods, classification of methods" @default.
- W1960088211 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1960088211 creator A5012604269 @default.
- W1960088211 creator A5054304725 @default.
- W1960088211 date "2013-01-01" @default.
- W1960088211 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W1960088211 title "INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL VALUATION: METHODS AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION" @default.
- W1960088211 cites W1504747440 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W1556397042 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W2034624865 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W2181808691 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W2397283132 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W3171522527 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W569806370 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W581249197 @default.
- W1960088211 cites W2182024185 @default.
- W1960088211 doi "https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2013.0.1413" @default.
- W1960088211 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W1960088211 type Work @default.
- W1960088211 sameAs 1960088211 @default.
- W1960088211 citedByCount "15" @default.
- W1960088211 countsByYear W19600882112015 @default.
- W1960088211 countsByYear W19600882112017 @default.
- W1960088211 countsByYear W19600882112018 @default.
- W1960088211 countsByYear W19600882112019 @default.
- W1960088211 countsByYear W19600882112020 @default.
- W1960088211 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1960088211 hasAuthorship W1960088211A5012604269 @default.
- W1960088211 hasAuthorship W1960088211A5054304725 @default.
- W1960088211 hasBestOaLocation W19600882111 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C186027771 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C2780838347 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C10138342 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C121955636 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C144133560 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C162118730 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C162324750 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C17744445 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C186027771 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C199539241 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C2780838347 @default.
- W1960088211 hasConceptScore W1960088211C34974158 @default.
- W1960088211 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W1960088211 hasLocation W19600882111 @default.
- W1960088211 hasOpenAccess W1960088211 @default.
- W1960088211 hasPrimaryLocation W19600882111 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W1526183364 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W1985822366 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W2040543671 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W2185436114 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W2744545459 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W2900208709 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W3092324000 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W3168364200 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W95901993 @default.
- W1960088211 hasRelatedWork W174965042 @default.
- W1960088211 hasVolume "92" @default.
- W1960088211 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1960088211 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1960088211 magId "1960088211" @default.
- W1960088211 workType "article" @default.