FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1963526892> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1963526892 endingPage "829" @default.
• W1963526892 startingPage "823" @default.
• W1963526892 abstract "Objective To study the relative utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral plexus in patients with systemic cancer and plexopathy. Design In a retrospective study, we identified all patients encountered at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1987 and 1993 with a diagnosis of lumbosacral plexopathy, and we selected for analysis those with MRI scans of the plexus (an abnormal finding was not necessary for inclusion) and a clinical and electrophysiologic appearance consistent with a diagnosis of metastatic lumbosacral plexopathy. Material and Methods The study group consisted of 31 patients (20 men and 11 women). The types of tumor were as follows: prostatic, 10 patients; colorectal, 7; bladder, 3; cervical, 3; and other, 8. Eighteen patients had received pelvic radiotherapy before diagnosis of lumbosacral plexopathy. All available MRI scans (in 27 patients) were reviewed blinded; the initial imaging report was used if the actual scans were unavailable (in 4). CT had been done in 22 patients, and results for 16 were available for blinded review. Original reports were available for the other six. Results Direct involvement of the lumbosacral plexus by tumor was evident on 23 MRI studies, and 6 others showed widespread metastatic disease in the region of the plexus. On 13 CT examinations, direct involvement of the lumbosacral plexus by tumor was noted. In four patients, MRI findings were abnormal and CT findings were normal. No patient had abnormal CT findings and normal MRI findings. Conclusion In this retrospective review, MRI was more sensitive than CT for diagnosing cancer-induced lumbosacral plexopathy. Thus, use of MRI should be considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients with clinical and electrophysiologic evidence of plexopathy and suspected systemic cancer. To study the relative utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral plexus in patients with systemic cancer and plexopathy. In a retrospective study, we identified all patients encountered at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1987 and 1993 with a diagnosis of lumbosacral plexopathy, and we selected for analysis those with MRI scans of the plexus (an abnormal finding was not necessary for inclusion) and a clinical and electrophysiologic appearance consistent with a diagnosis of metastatic lumbosacral plexopathy. The study group consisted of 31 patients (20 men and 11 women). The types of tumor were as follows: prostatic, 10 patients; colorectal, 7; bladder, 3; cervical, 3; and other, 8. Eighteen patients had received pelvic radiotherapy before diagnosis of lumbosacral plexopathy. All available MRI scans (in 27 patients) were reviewed blinded; the initial imaging report was used if the actual scans were unavailable (in 4). CT had been done in 22 patients, and results for 16 were available for blinded review. Original reports were available for the other six. Direct involvement of the lumbosacral plexus by tumor was evident on 23 MRI studies, and 6 others showed widespread metastatic disease in the region of the plexus. On 13 CT examinations, direct involvement of the lumbosacral plexus by tumor was noted. In four patients, MRI findings were abnormal and CT findings were normal. No patient had abnormal CT findings and normal MRI findings. In this retrospective review, MRI was more sensitive than CT for diagnosing cancer-induced lumbosacral plexopathy. Thus, use of MRI should be considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients with clinical and electrophysiologic evidence of plexopathy and suspected systemic cancer." @default.
• W1963526892 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1963526892 creator A5010620719 @default.
• W1963526892 creator A5057041553 @default.
• W1963526892 creator A5064400725 @default.
• W1963526892 creator A5067070663 @default.
• W1963526892 date "1997-09-01" @default.
• W1963526892 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W1963526892 title "Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cancer-Related Lumbosacral Plexopathy" @default.
• W1963526892 cites W1993193760 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2013054323 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2024332851 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2068542066 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2078367646 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2091963898 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2114523009 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2119866150 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W2323866103 @default.
• W1963526892 cites W4251439813 @default.
• W1963526892 doi "https://doi.org/10.4065/72.9.823" @default.
• W1963526892 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9294528" @default.
• W1963526892 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W1963526892 type Work @default.
• W1963526892 sameAs 1963526892 @default.
• W1963526892 citedByCount "79" @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922012 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922013 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922014 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922015 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922016 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922018 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922019 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922020 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922021 @default.
• W1963526892 countsByYear W19635268922022 @default.
• W1963526892 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1963526892 hasAuthorship W1963526892A5010620719 @default.
• W1963526892 hasAuthorship W1963526892A5057041553 @default.
• W1963526892 hasAuthorship W1963526892A5064400725 @default.
• W1963526892 hasAuthorship W1963526892A5067070663 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C2776613520 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C2781151446 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C2911088228 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C7146039 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C126838900 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C141071460 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C143409427 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C167135981 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C2776613520 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C2781151446 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C2911088228 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C7146039 @default.
• W1963526892 hasConceptScore W1963526892C71924100 @default.
• W1963526892 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W1963526892 hasLocation W19635268921 @default.
• W1963526892 hasLocation W19635268922 @default.
• W1963526892 hasOpenAccess W1963526892 @default.
• W1963526892 hasPrimaryLocation W19635268921 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W164790737 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W2027097615 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W2060044186 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W2136950084 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W2166385392 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W2562676173 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W2791270157 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W3111642722 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W3164135267 @default.
• W1963526892 hasRelatedWork W4233315377 @default.
• W1963526892 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W1963526892 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1963526892 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1963526892 magId "1963526892" @default.
• W1963526892 workType "article" @default.