FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1963578265> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1963578265 endingPage "361" @default.
• W1963578265 startingPage "350" @default.
• W1963578265 abstract "This article uses the evolving understandings of commercial organic agriculture within two research programmes in New Zealand to address three problematic claims and associated framings that have underpinned analysis of the political economy of commercial organic agriculture. These three framings are: 1) that recent commercial developments in organic agriculture have become organised around a grand binary of large-scale, corporate, industrialised organic agriculture that is inhabited by pragmatic newcomers to the industry, against a small-scale, local, authentic remnant of the original organic social movement. This grand binary is most popularly recognisable in the claim by author Michael Pollan of the existence of an ‘Organic Industrial Complex’ that is slowly subsuming authentic organic agriculture. This relates to claim 2) that commercialisation creates inevitable pressures by which organic agriculture becomes ‘conventionalised’. Finally, claim 3) positions organic agriculture alone as the only option for enabling improved environmental outcomes in agriculture. The Greening Food and ARGOS research programmes in New Zealand have studied the emergence of commercial forms of organic and other ‘sustainable’ agriculture in the period since 1995. A series of key engagements are highlighted in the unfolding history of these two programmes which demonstrate moments of transition in understandings of commercial organic, particularly in relation to situations of engagements between the research team and wider actors in the organic sector. These key engagements establish a clear sense in which the three major framings around the political economy of organic commercialisation could not explain the unfolding dynamics of the New Zealand organic sector. Rather, engagement with diverse actors enabled a whole new set of theoretical questions that opened up new areas of politics, contestation and elaboration of commercial forms of organic agriculture – particularly around shifts in power to the retail end of the agri-food chain, around new forms of agri-food governance, and around the politics of new audit systems. Within these shifts, the ontology of some of the researchers within these projects underwent parallel transformation. These transformative influences operated in two simultaneous directions. While the engaged research strategy of the two programmes clearly discomforted the researchers’ underlying assumptions for framing the major trajectories of commercial organic development, the presence of the two research programmes also had an important enactive power in the sector by both rendering ‘thinkable’ particular trajectories and economic experiments and also by reinforcing a ‘metric-centric’ tendency in the evolution of global environmental audit systems. Seen in this light, these engagements open up new questions about the research programmes themselves in terms of the emerging politics of what Philip Lowe describes as a more ‘enactive’ rural sociology and help direct attention to an emerging ‘ontological turn’ in the practice and politics of research." @default.
• W1963578265 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1963578265 creator A5048528123 @default.
• W1963578265 creator A5082560681 @default.
• W1963578265 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W1963578265 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1963578265 title "After the ‘Organic Industrial Complex’: An ontological expedition through commercial organic agriculture in New Zealand" @default.
• W1963578265 cites W1553739171 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W1987425798 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W1995683955 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2007586991 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2009860114 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2016006640 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2034016613 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2038217506 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2038420893 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2047756098 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2066764414 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2069431862 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2078002486 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2081014634 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2108434325 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2113224922 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2123380012 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2125257108 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2126593672 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2150227645 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2150995156 @default.
• W1963578265 cites W2151610936 @default.
• W1963578265 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.04.003" @default.
• W1963578265 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1963578265 type Work @default.
• W1963578265 sameAs 1963578265 @default.
• W1963578265 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652012 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652013 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652014 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652015 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652016 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652017 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652018 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652019 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652020 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652021 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652022 @default.
• W1963578265 countsByYear W19635782652023 @default.
• W1963578265 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1963578265 hasAuthorship W1963578265A5048528123 @default.
• W1963578265 hasAuthorship W1963578265A5082560681 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C118817206 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C118518473 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C118817206 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C144024400 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C166957645 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C17744445 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C199539241 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C205649164 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C2778755073 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C58640448 @default.
• W1963578265 hasConceptScore W1963578265C94625758 @default.
• W1963578265 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1963578265 hasLocation W19635782651 @default.
• W1963578265 hasOpenAccess W1963578265 @default.
• W1963578265 hasPrimaryLocation W19635782651 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W1541386068 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2055548239 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2107587347 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2278106348 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2296695680 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2372238622 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2902243969 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W2995622029 @default.
• W1963578265 hasRelatedWork W345772227 @default.
• W1963578265 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W1963578265 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1963578265 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1963578265 magId "1963578265" @default.
• W1963578265 workType "article" @default.