FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1963970071> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1963970071 endingPage "24663" @default.
• W1963970071 startingPage "24657" @default.
• W1963970071 abstract "We have investigated the interactions with isolated mitochondria and intact cells of chloromethyltetramethylrosamine (CMTMRos), a probe (Mitotracker OrangeTM) that is increasingly used to monitor the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) in situ. CMTMRos binds to isolated mitochondria and undergoes a large fluorescence quenching. Most of the binding is energy-independent and can be substantially reduced by sulfhydryl reagents. A smaller fraction of the probe is able to redistribute across the inner membrane in response to a membrane potential, with further fluorescence quenching. Within minutes, however, this energy-dependent fluorescence quenching spontaneously reverts to the same level obtained by treating mitochondria with the uncoupler carbonylcyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenyl hydrazone. We show that this event depends on inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain at complex I and on induction of the permeability transition pore by CMTMRos, with concomitant depolarization, swelling, and release of cytochrome c. After staining cells with CMTMRos, depolarization of mitochondria in situ with protonophores is accompanied by changes of CMTMRos fluorescence that range between small and undetectable, depending on the probe concentration. A lasting decrease of cellular CMTMRos fluorescence associated with mitochondria only results from treatment with thiol reagents, suggesting that CMTMRos binding to mitochondria in living cells largely occurs at SH groups via the probe chloromethyl moiety irrespective of the magnitude of Δψm. Induction of the permeability transition precludes the use of CMTMRos as a reliable probe of Δψm in situ and demands a reassessment of the conclusion that cytochrome c release can occur without membrane depolarization and/or onset of the permeability transition. We have investigated the interactions with isolated mitochondria and intact cells of chloromethyltetramethylrosamine (CMTMRos), a probe (Mitotracker OrangeTM) that is increasingly used to monitor the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) in situ. CMTMRos binds to isolated mitochondria and undergoes a large fluorescence quenching. Most of the binding is energy-independent and can be substantially reduced by sulfhydryl reagents. A smaller fraction of the probe is able to redistribute across the inner membrane in response to a membrane potential, with further fluorescence quenching. Within minutes, however, this energy-dependent fluorescence quenching spontaneously reverts to the same level obtained by treating mitochondria with the uncoupler carbonylcyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenyl hydrazone. We show that this event depends on inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain at complex I and on induction of the permeability transition pore by CMTMRos, with concomitant depolarization, swelling, and release of cytochrome c. After staining cells with CMTMRos, depolarization of mitochondria in situ with protonophores is accompanied by changes of CMTMRos fluorescence that range between small and undetectable, depending on the probe concentration. A lasting decrease of cellular CMTMRos fluorescence associated with mitochondria only results from treatment with thiol reagents, suggesting that CMTMRos binding to mitochondria in living cells largely occurs at SH groups via the probe chloromethyl moiety irrespective of the magnitude of Δψm. Induction of the permeability transition precludes the use of CMTMRos as a reliable probe of Δψm in situ and demands a reassessment of the conclusion that cytochrome c release can occur without membrane depolarization and/or onset of the permeability transition. permeability transition chloromethyltetramethyl rosamine mitochondrial permeability transition pore phenylarsine oxide carbonylcyanidep-trifluoromethoxyphenyl hydrazone tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid N-ethylmaleimide The role of mitochondria in apoptosis has been related to the release of two intermembrane proteins, cytochrome c and apoptosis-inducing factor. In the presence of μm dATP or mm ATP, cytochrome c is able to activate procaspase 9, followed by activation of procaspase 3 (1Liu X. Kim C.N. Yang J. Jemmerson R. Wang X. Cell. 1996; 86: 147-157Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4484) Google Scholar, 2Yang J. Liu X. Bhalla K. Kim C.N. Ibrado A.M. Cai J. Peng T.I. Jones D.P. Wang X. Science. 1997; 275: 1129-1132Crossref PubMed Scopus (4422) Google Scholar). Apoptosis-inducing factor is a protease acting through proteolytic activation of a nuclear endonuclease (3Susin S.A. Zamzami N. Castedo M. Hirsch T. Marchetti P. Macho A. Daugas E. Geuskens M. Kroemer G. J. Exp. Med. 1996; 184: 1331-1341Crossref PubMed Scopus (1030) Google Scholar). Cloning has recently revealed that apoptosis-inducing factor is a flavoprotein with predicted mass of 57 kDa that displays a striking homology with bacterial ferredoxin and NADH oxidoreductases (4Susin S.A. Lorenzo H.K. Zamzami N. Marzo I. Snow B.E. Brothers G.M. Mangion J. Jacotot E. Costantini P. Loeffler M. Larochette N. Goodlett D.R. Aebersold R. Siderovski D.P. Penninger J.M. Kroemer G. Nature. 1999; 397: 441-446Crossref PubMed Scopus (3464) Google Scholar). Activation of the apoptotic program by these mitochondrial proteins requires their release into the cytosol, and the mechanism(s) by which this occurs is the subject of intense investigation (see Refs. 5Bernardi P. Scorrano L. Colonna R. Petronilli V. Di Lisa F. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999; (in press)PubMed Google Scholar, 6Cai J. Yang J. Jones D.P. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998; 1366: 139-149Crossref PubMed Scopus (649) Google Scholar, 7Susin S.A. Zamzami N. Kroemer G. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998; 1366: 151-165Crossref PubMed Scopus (761) Google Scholar for reviews). One of the most studied targets is the mitochondrial PT,1 a sudden increase of the inner membrane permeability to solutes that has been extensively studied for at least 40 years (see Refs. 8Bernardi P. Broekemeier K.M. Pfeiffer D.R. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1994; 26: 509-517Crossref PubMed Scopus (528) Google Scholar, 9Gunter T.E. Gunter K.K. Sheu S.S. Gavin C.E. Am. J. Physiol. 1994; 267: C313-C339Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 10Zoratti M. Szabo I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1995; 1241: 139-176Crossref PubMed Scopus (2199) Google Scholar, 11Bernardi P. Physiol. Rev. 1999; 79 (in press)Crossref PubMed Scopus (1347) Google Scholar for reviews). It is generally agreed that the PT is due to opening of a high conductance channel, MTP, which is activated by matrix Ca2+ and inhibited by CsA. The MTP possesses regulatory sites that accommodate many mediators of cell death, and its opening in vitro is accompanied by depolarization and matrix swelling. A specific question is whether or not a mitochondrial PT is a requisite for the release of apoptogenic proteins, an issue that has generated conflicting results (2Yang J. Liu X. Bhalla K. Kim C.N. Ibrado A.M. Cai J. Peng T.I. Jones D.P. Wang X. Science. 1997; 275: 1129-1132Crossref PubMed Scopus (4422) Google Scholar, 3Susin S.A. Zamzami N. Castedo M. Hirsch T. Marchetti P. Macho A. Daugas E. Geuskens M. Kroemer G. J. Exp. Med. 1996; 184: 1331-1341Crossref PubMed Scopus (1030) Google Scholar, 4Susin S.A. Lorenzo H.K. Zamzami N. Marzo I. Snow B.E. Brothers G.M. Mangion J. Jacotot E. Costantini P. Loeffler M. Larochette N. Goodlett D.R. Aebersold R. Siderovski D.P. Penninger J.M. Kroemer G. Nature. 1999; 397: 441-446Crossref PubMed Scopus (3464) Google Scholar, 12Kluck R.M. Bossy-Wetzel E. Green D.R. Newmeyer D.D. Science. 1997; 275: 1132-1136Crossref PubMed Scopus (4289) Google Scholar, 13Pastorino J.G. Chen S.T. Tafani M. Snyder J.W. Farber J.L. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 7770-7775Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (535) Google Scholar, 14Bradham C.A. Qian T. Streetz K. Trautwein C. Brenner D.A. Lemasters J.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998; 18: 6353-6364Crossref PubMed Scopus (368) Google Scholar, 15Li H. Zhu H. Xu C.J. Yuan J. Cell. 1998; 94: 491-501Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3798) Google Scholar, 16Bossy-Wetzel E. Newmeyer D.D. Green D.R. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 37-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (1107) Google Scholar, 17Eskes R. Antonsson B. Osen-Sand A. Montessuit S. Richter C. Sadoul R. Mazzei G. Nichols A. Martinou J.-C. J. Cell Biol. 1998; 143: 217-224Crossref PubMed Scopus (586) Google Scholar, 18Heiskanen K.M. Bhat M.B. Wang H.-W. Ma J. Nieminen A.-L. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 5654-5658Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (306) Google Scholar, 19Finucane D.M. Bossy-Wetzel E. Waterhouse N.J. Cotter T.G. Green D.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 2225-2233Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (653) Google Scholar). Mitochondrial membrane potential difference (Δψm) in single cells is routinely measured using cationic fluorescent probes in conjunction with microscopy techniques. One of the properties of the ideal probe is minimal or absent passive binding to mitochondrial or other intracellular membranes, which allows its rapid response to changes of Δψm (see Ref. 20Rottenberg H. Wu S. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998; 1404: 393-404Crossref PubMed Scopus (227) Google Scholar for a thorough discussion). However, studies of mitochondrial involvement in cell death often demand the assessment of a series of parameters that may require cell fixation, including assessment of cytochrome c release with in situ methods based on immunodetection. This is obviously not compatible with the maintenance of Δψm, because fixation leads to immediate depolarization with release of the Δψm probes previously accumulated by energized mitochondria. To circumvent this problem, Kroemer and co-workers (21Macho A. Decaudin D. Castedo M. Hirsch T. Susin S.A. Zamzami N. Kroemer G. Cytometry. 1996; 25: 333-340Crossref PubMed Scopus (159) Google Scholar) introduced the use of chloromethyl derivatives of the fluorescent cationic rosamine probes (MitotrackerTM). The rationale is that the positively charged probe will be accumulated by energized mitochondria in response to Δψm, followed by binding to mitochondrial SH groups via the probe chloromethyl moiety. At this point, the covalently bound probe should not be released despite de-energization and therefore stably “mark” the membrane potential existing prior to disruption of membrane integrity. Macho et al. (21Macho A. Decaudin D. Castedo M. Hirsch T. Susin S.A. Zamzami N. Kroemer G. Cytometry. 1996; 25: 333-340Crossref PubMed Scopus (159) Google Scholar) indeed showed that accumulation of one of the Mitotracker dyes by thymocytes is somewhat reduced by the uncoupler FCCP. This study represented the basis for the widespread use of Mitotrackers (including those that have never been tested in mitochondria like CMTMRos) as probes of Δψm in the course of apoptosis (16Bossy-Wetzel E. Newmeyer D.D. Green D.R. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 37-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (1107) Google Scholar). Because no reports were available on the interactions of CMTMRos with isolated mitochondria, we have carried out a detailed characterization of its effects on basic mitochondrial functions. We show that CMTMRos inhibits the mitochondrial respiratory chain at complex I and that it induces opening of the MTP with concomitant depolarization, swelling, and release of cytochrome c. Depolarization of mitochondria in situ with protonophores is accompanied by small or negligible changes of CMTMRos fluorescence, depending on the probe concentration, whereas large and lasting fluorescence changes only result from treatment with specific thiol reagents that also decrease probe binding to isolated mitochondria. These results demonstrate that CMTMRos is not a reliable Δψm probe and demand a reassessment of the evidence that cytochrome c release can occur without membrane depolarization and/or onset of the PT, which has largely been based on the lack of CMTMRos fluorescence changes in the course of apoptosis (15Li H. Zhu H. Xu C.J. Yuan J. Cell. 1998; 94: 491-501Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3798) Google Scholar, 16Bossy-Wetzel E. Newmeyer D.D. Green D.R. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 37-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (1107) Google Scholar, 19Finucane D.M. Bossy-Wetzel E. Waterhouse N.J. Cotter T.G. Green D.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 2225-2233Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (653) Google Scholar). Liver mitochondria were isolated from Albino Wistar rats weighing about 300 g by standard centrifugation techniques, as described previously (22Costantini P. Petronilli V. Colonna R. Bernardi P. Toxicology. 1995; 99: 77-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). Mitochondrial absorbance changes were followed at 620 nm with a Perkin-Elmer Lambda-10 spectrophotometer, and spectrofluorometric measurements were performed with a Perkin-Elmer LS50-B or a Hitachi-Perkin-Elmer 650–40 spectrofluorometer. Oxygen consumption was determined polarographically using a Clark-type oxygen electrode. All assays were performed at 25 °C in instruments equipped with thermostatic control and magnetic stirring. In the experiments of Fig. 1 C, mitochondria (25 mg × ml−1) in 0.2 m sucrose, 10 mmTris-MOPS, pH 7.4, 0.5 mm EGTA-Tris were treated with 400 pmol × mg protein−1 FCCP. Identical aliquots were then supplemented with 1 μmol × mg protein−1 NEM, 100 nmol × mg protein−1 PhAsO, or 1 μmol × mg protein−1 NEM plus 100 nmol × mg protein−1 PhAsO, and incubations were continued for 1 h on ice. The emission spectra of CMTMRos (see Fig. 1 D) were collected at λexc = 505 nm, with excitation and emission slits set at 2.5 nm. Other measurements of CMTMRos fluorescence were performed at λexc = 525 nm and λem = 576 nm with excitation and emission slits of 2 and 5 nm, respectively. Mitochondrial membrane potential was estimated on the Nernst equilibration of rhodamine 123, assuming a matrix volume of 1 μl × mg protein−1. Mitochondrial rhodamine 123 uptake was determined under the specified conditions from the fluorescence changes of mitochondrial suspensions containing 0.7 μm rhodamine 123. Because of the presence of CMTMRos during these measurements, variations of rhodamine 123 fluorescence were monitored at the wavelength pair 465–525, with slits set at 2 and 5 nm, respectively. These conditions allowed minimization of the spectral interference between the two probes but could not completely prevent a fluorescence decrease upon the addition of CMTMRos. This abrupt fluorescence change, which was Δψm-independent and occurred also in fully de-energized mitochondria, was subtracted in the Δψmcalculations shown in Fig. 4. MH1C1 rat hepatoma cells were seeded onto uncoated 22-mm-diameter round glass coverslips and grown for 2 days in Ham's F-10 nutrient mixture supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum, in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air 5% CO2 at 37 °C in a Forma tissue culture water-jacketed incubator. MH1C1 cells grown on each coverslip were then loaded for 45 min at 37 °C with the indicated concentration of the specified probe dissolved in 0.5 ml of Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (Sigma D6650) without penicillin and maintained in the same medium after loading. Cell fluorescence images were acquired with an Olympus IMT-2 inverted microscope, which was equipped for epifluorescent illumination and included a xenon light source (75 W), a 12-bit digital cooled CCD camera (Micromax, Princeton Instruments), and excitation-emission wavelength filter settings at bandpass 545 ± 25 nm to 590 nm longpass. Images were collected with exposure times ranging between 80 and 100 ms using a 40×, 1.3 NA oil immersion objective (Nikon). Data were acquired and analyzed using Metamorph software (Universal Imaging). Clusters of several mitochondria (10–30 mitochondria) were identified as regions of interest, whereas nuclear regions were identified as cellular areas without appreciable mitochondrial fluorescence. Background was taken from fields not containing cells. Sequential digital images were acquired every 30 s for 10–20 min, and the average fluorescence intensity of all the regions of interest, of the nuclear regions, and of the background was recorded and stored for subsequent analysis. Mitochondrial fluorescence intensities minus background are reported in Fig. 5 after normalization of the initial fluorescence for comparative purposes, and they represent the mean of 10 regions of interest from three different sets of cells. CMTMRos and rhodamine 123 were purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR) and dissolved in Me2SO. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma and were of the highest available grade. Cyclosporin A was a generous gift from Novartis (Basel, CH). CMTMRos is a probe that stains mitochondria in situ. Because it carries a net positive charge, it can be accumulated by energized mitochondria, which indeed are brightly colored by CMTMRos in living cells in culture (see Fig. 5). Through its chloromethyl moiety, on the other hand, CMTMRos can form covalent bonds with SH groups in proteins, which is the basis for its being “fixable.” Because a reliable probe must be able to redistribute depending on Δψm, we studied the interactions of CMTMRos with isolated mitochondria under different metabolic conditions. The experiments of Fig. 1 report the kinetics of CMTMRos fluorescence quenching following addition of mitochondria and of different respiratory substrates (preliminary experiments indicated that fluorescence quenching is not accompanied by shifts in the emission spectrum of CMTMRos; results not shown). In the absence of rotenone, the addition of mitochondria caused extensive fluorescence quenching that could only be marginally enhanced by addition of the respiratory substrates glutamate and malate (Fig.1 A). Shortly after the addition of mitochondria, however, the fluorescence signal increased spontaneously to a level that could only be marginally modified by FCCP (this sequence of events was also observed in the absence of added substrates; results not shown). Addition of mitochondria in the presence of rotenone was followed by a smaller fluorescence quenching, which was enhanced by energization with succinate (Fig. 1 B). Also in this case, after a few minutes the fluorescence signal spontaneously returned to the level preceding the addition of substrate and could not be further modified by FCCP. This same level of fluorescence was obtained upon the addition of mitochondria treated with FCCP (Fig. 1 C, trace a) or by adding FCCP prior to the spontaneous fluorescence increase (Fig.1, dashed traces in A and B). Finally, the CMTMRos fluorescence quenching observed upon the addition of mitochondria in the presence of FCCP (Fig. 1 C, trace a) could be reduced by pretreatment with NEM (Fig. 1C, trace b) or with the hydrophobic dithiol reagent PhAsO (Fig. 1C, trace c), no additive effects being observed with the two compounds together (Fig. 1 C, trace d). To study the relationship between fluorescence quenching and binding of CMTMRos to mitochondria, we incubated a solution of 2 μmCMTMRos with mitochondria that had been (i) de-energized with rotenone, (ii) energized with succinate, or (iii) energized with succinate, followed by de-energization with FCCP (i.e. conditions like those illustrated in Fig. 1 B for the fluorescence-quenching experiments). Mitochondria were then separated by centrifugation, and the residual fluorescence of the supernatants was measured and compared with that of CMTMRos prior to the addition of mitochondria. Fig.1 D shows that rotenone-treated mitochondria bound a large fraction of CMTMRos (trace b, compare with trace a), that energization with succinate caused further CMTMRos binding (trace c, compare with trace b), and that treatment with FCCP released only the dye that had been accumulated upon energization (trace d, compare with trace c). These experiments indicate that CMTMRos fluorescence quenching by mitochondria is due to binding of the probe and that two components can be clearly identified: (i) one component is energy-independent, in that it is also observed in de-energized mitochondria (treatment with rotenone prior to the addition of succinate, Fig. 1 B; pretreatment with FCCP, Fig. 1C); this component largely (but not exclusively) results from binding to SH groups, in that it can be significantly prevented by NEM and PhAsO (Fig. 1C); (ii) one component is energy-dependent, in that it is observed only in mitochondria energized with endogenous substrates or with added glutamate plus malate (Fig. 1 A) or with succinate (Fig.1 B); this component of CMTMRos quenching is readily reversed by de-energization with FCCP (dashed traces in Fig. 1, A and B), suggesting that it is measuring Δψm. The major problem identified in these experiments is that within minutes of the energy-dependent accumulation of CMTMRos mitochondria undergo spontaneous release of the probe, suggesting that they have depolarized. In principle, mitochondrial depolarization can be caused by inhibition of respiration, increased membrane permeability to protons (or charged species in general), or both. One of the most studied endogenous targets for permeability changes is the MTP, an inner membrane high conductance channel whose opening leads to collapse of the Δψm and to solute equilibration within the limits of the channel's exclusion size of approximately 1,500 Da (see Ref. 11Bernardi P. Physiol. Rev. 1999; 79 (in press)Crossref PubMed Scopus (1347) Google Scholarfor a recent review). MTP opening can be conveniently studied based on the apparent absorbance change of mitochondria, which decreases when the pore opens and mitochondria swell (11Bernardi P. Physiol. Rev. 1999; 79 (in press)Crossref PubMed Scopus (1347) Google Scholar). The experiments of Fig.2 document the volume changes following the addition of CMTMRos to mitochondria energized with either glutamate plus malate (Fig. 2 A) or succinate in the presence of rotenone (Fig. 2 B). Following the accumulation of a small Ca2+ load that did not cause MTP opening per se, EGTA was added to prevent Ca2+ release via the uniporter (23Igbavboa U. Pfeiffer D.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 1405-1412Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), followed by increasing concentrations of CMTMRos. CMTMRos caused a decrease of absorbance (Fig. 2, A and B, traces a–d) that was fully prevented by CsA (Fig. 2, A and B, traces e) and therefore mediated by MTP opening. CMTMRos was a more effective inducer with glutamate and malate (Fig. 2 A and closed symbols in Fig. 2 C) than with succinate as the substrate (Fig.2 B and open symbols in Fig. 2 C), suggesting specific interactions with respiratory complex I, which is a well characterized element of MTP modulation (24Fontaine E. Eriksson O. Ichas F. Bernardi P. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 12662-12668Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (297) Google Scholar, 25Fontaine E. Ichas F. Bernardi P. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 25734-25740Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (226) Google Scholar). It is important to note that CMTMRos caused a PT at submicromolar concentrations, i.e. well within the range that is used in cellular studies. We next assessed the effects of CMTMRos on mitochondrial electron transfer by measuring the rate of uncoupled (maximal) respiration at increasing CMTMRos concentrations. Depolarization favors opening of the MTP (26Bernardi P. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 8834-8839Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), which causes (i) depletion of pyridine nucleotides (with secondary inhibition of electron transfer from NAD+-dependent substrates to complex I) and (ii) swelling with gradual cytochrome c depletion (with secondary inhibition of electron transfer between the bc1 and aa3 cytochromes). These measurements, illustrated in Fig.3, were therefore performed both in the presence (open symbols) and absence (closed symbols) of CsA, to sort out the primary effects of CMTMRos on electron transfer from the secondary effects mediated by events caused by MTP opening. CMTMRos inhibited electron transfer at complex I (Fig.3 A, open symbols), and respiratory inhibition was dramatically potentiated by omission of CsA (Fig. 3 A, closed symbols). On the other hand, respiration through complexes II + III was much less affected by CMTMRos (Fig.3 B, open symbols), inhibition of respiration being observed only at 5 μm CMTMRos (Fig. 3 B, open symbols), whereas the early inhibition observed in the absence of CsA (Fig. 3 B, closed symbols) was due to MTP-dependent loss of cytochrome c and could be prevented by 10 μm added cytochrome c (results not shown). These effects of CMTMRos (inhibition of complex I and, at higher concentrations, of complexes II and III; induction of MTP opening) can easily explain the spontaneous increase of CMTMRos fluorescence observed in Fig. 1 as being due to CMTMRos-dependent mitochondrial depolarization. This issue was addressed directly in protocols where Δψm was measured with rhodamine 123 (a probe that displayed a tolerable overlap with the CMTMRos spectrum). Fig.4 shows that in the absence of CsA submicromolar concentrations of CMTMRos caused a dramatic depolarization of mitochondria irrespective of whether complex I or complex II electron donors were used (Fig. 4, A and B, closed symbols), although depolarization was more effective in the former case. In the presence of CsA, depolarization was still observed with submicromolar concentrations of CMTMRos with glutamate plus malate as the substrates, whereas higher concentrations were needed with succinate. These experiments confirm that CMTMRos dramatically impairs maintenance of the Δψm through effects that can be explained by a combination of respiratory inhibition and MTP opening. CMTMRos is being increasingly used to monitor Δψm in living cells (15Li H. Zhu H. Xu C.J. Yuan J. Cell. 1998; 94: 491-501Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3798) Google Scholar,16Bossy-Wetzel E. Newmeyer D.D. Green D.R. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 37-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (1107) Google Scholar, 19Finucane D.M. Bossy-Wetzel E. Waterhouse N.J. Cotter T.G. Green D.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 2225-2233Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (653) Google Scholar, 27Wadia J.S. Chalmers-Redman R.M.E. Ju W.J.H. Carlile G.W. Phillips J.L. Fraser A.D. Tatton W.G. J. Neurosci. 1998; 18: 932-947Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). The problems posed by cellular measurements are different from those encountered in studies with isolated mitochondria. In studies with isolated mitochondria very high intramitochondrial concentrations are reached, which in turn result in extensive self-quenching of the dye fluorescence (Fig. 1). In principle, this can be exploited to estimate Δψm, whose magnitude is indeed related to quenching of the total suspension fluorescence. Conversely, when mitochondria are studied with the same probe in cytofluorimetric or imaging protocols, the magnitude of Δψm is estimated from the intensity of the cell fluorescence. We have therefore studied the interactions of CMTMRos with living cells and assessed its response to depolarization and sulfhydryl reagents in imaging protocols where conditions were optimized for staining of mitochondria in situ. In the experiments of Fig. 5, fluorescence changes were studied in cultures of MH1C1 cells grown on coverslips and loaded with CMTMRos concentrations ranging between 25 and 150 nm or with 25 nm TMRM, a widely used Δψm probe (28Loew L.M. Tuft R.A. Carrington W. Fay F.S. Biophys. J. 1993; 65: 2396-2407Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar). In all cases the fluorescence displayed a punctate pattern typical of a mitochondrial distribution, which was stable with time. The addition of FCCP was followed by fluorescence changes that critically depended on the CMTMRos concentration. A small and stable fluorescence decrease was observed at 25 nmCMTMRos (Fig. 5, A, A′, and trace a), while essentially no change was detected at 75 nm (Fig. 5, B, B′, and trace b) and 150 nm CMTMRos (Fig. 5, C, C′, and trace c). Even under the most favorable conditions (25 nm CMTMRos), the fluorescence response to FCCP was a minimal fraction of that displayed by TMRM (Fig. 5, D, D′, and trace d). The interaction of CMTMRos with mitochondria in intact cells was addressed further in the experiments of Fig.6. MH1C1 cells were incubated with 150 nm CMTMRos (Fig. 6 A). As expected, the punctate pattern of cellular fluorescence was not affected by pretreatment with FCCP (Fig. 6 B), whereas pretreatment with NEM (Fig.6 C) or PhAsO (Fig. 6 D) significantly changed the staining pattern. In both cases the cytoplasmic staining became diffuse, and nuclei became fluorescent with brigth nucleolar-type staining, an effect that was particularly prominent in the case of NEM (Fig. 6 C). These results indicate that mitochondrially associated CMTMRos fluorescence displays a prevalent energy-independent component in intact cells as well and that mitochondrial binding largely occurs at SH groups. In this paper we have shown that CMTMRos is a powerful inducer of the mitochondrial PT and a respiratory inhibitor that is particularly efficient with respiratory complex I. Once MTP opening has occurred, further respiratory inhibition takes place because of depletion of pyridine nucleotides and of cytochrome c. As a result of these effects, CMTMRos causes mitochondrial depolarization; yet most of the probe cannot be released because it binds in an energy-independent way. Rather than reporting changes of Δψm, variations of CMTMRos fluorescence are more likely to reflect modification of mitochondrial and cellular SH groups. The major conclusion of the present study is therefore that CMTMRos cannot be used as a reliable Δψm probe in living cells, a consideration that has profound implications for the current debate on the role of mitochondria in cell death and in particular on the mechanism of cytochrome c release in apoptosis. Indeed, a PT caused by CMTMRos could have contributed to cause cytochrome c release in situ, and the ensuing depolarization may simply not have been detected (15Li H. Zhu H. Xu C.J. Yuan J. Cell. 1998; 94: 491-501Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3798) Google Scholar, 16Bossy-Wetzel E. Newmeyer D.D. Green D.R. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 37-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (1107) Google Scholar, 19Finucane D.M. Bossy-Wetzel E. Waterhouse N.J. Cotter T.G. Green D.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 2225-2233Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (653) Google Scholar) by the lack of fluorescence changes of the probe. It must also be stressed that CMTMRos still stains mitochondria in cells that have been treated with fully uncoupling concentrations of FCCP (Fig.6 B). Our results invalidate conclusions about the time sequence of events between mitochondrial depolarization and cytochrome c release that are based on the use of CMTMRos irrespective of whether the probe is added before or after the apoptotic stimulus." @default.
• W1963970071 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1963970071 creator A5009191571 @default.
• W1963970071 creator A5023254266 @default.
• W1963970071 creator A5048249574 @default.
• W1963970071 creator A5051195022 @default.
• W1963970071 creator A5084461704 @default.
• W1963970071 date "1999-08-01" @default.
• W1963970071 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1963970071 title "Chloromethyltetramethylrosamine (Mitotracker OrangeTM) Induces the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition and Inhibits Respiratory Complex I" @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1482769266 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1580567817 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1920479129 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1950408523 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1964826110 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1979995768 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1985731963 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W1987126302 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2009222624 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2011166211 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2051258629 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2052793452 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2062853648 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2063385957 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2071012018 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2072858020 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2074329998 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2074330066 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2085897581 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2108131089 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2110029891 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2130866079 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2142700343 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2149967205 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2152202561 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2158398965 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2159650080 @default.
• W1963970071 cites W2255476717 @default.
• W1963970071 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.35.24657" @default.
• W1963970071 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10455132" @default.
• W1963970071 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W1963970071 type Work @default.
• W1963970071 sameAs 1963970071 @default.
• W1963970071 citedByCount "106" @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712012 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712013 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712014 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712015 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712016 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712017 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712018 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712020 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712021 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712022 @default.
• W1963970071 countsByYear W19639700712023 @default.
• W1963970071 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1963970071 hasAuthorship W1963970071A5009191571 @default.
• W1963970071 hasAuthorship W1963970071A5023254266 @default.
• W1963970071 hasAuthorship W1963970071A5048249574 @default.
• W1963970071 hasAuthorship W1963970071A5051195022 @default.
• W1963970071 hasAuthorship W1963970071A5084461704 @default.
• W1963970071 hasBestOaLocation W19639700711 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C120882062 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C13591479 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C190283241 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C28859421 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C31573885 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C105702510 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C120882062 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C12554922 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C13591479 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C185592680 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C190283241 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C28859421 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C31573885 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C41625074 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C534529494 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C55493867 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C86803240 @default.
• W1963970071 hasConceptScore W1963970071C95444343 @default.
• W1963970071 hasIssue "35" @default.
• W1963970071 hasLocation W19639700711 @default.
• W1963970071 hasOpenAccess W1963970071 @default.
• W1963970071 hasPrimaryLocation W19639700711 @default.
• W1963970071 hasRelatedWork W1535995443 @default.
• W1963970071 hasRelatedWork W1593734817 @default.
• W1963970071 hasRelatedWork W1967012492 @default.
• W1963970071 hasRelatedWork W2028385511 @default.
• W1963970071 hasRelatedWork W2080989668 @default.
• W1963970071 hasRelatedWork W2084248263 @default.

• next