FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1963977428> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1963977428 endingPage "1012" @default.
• W1963977428 startingPage "1004" @default.
• W1963977428 abstract "ObjectiveThe optimal treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease is not well established. Hybrid coronary revascularization by combining the left internal mammary artery–left anterior descending artery graft and drug-eluting stents in non–left anterior descending artery territories might offer superior results compared with sole coronary artery bypass grafting or sole percutaneous coronary intervention.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the 30-day outcomes of 381 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 301) vs hybrid coronary revascularization (n = 80). In a 2 × 2 matrix, the 2 groups were stratified by the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (≤32 vs ≥33) and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (euroSCORE) (<5 vs ≥5). The composite endpoint (death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome) and secondary endpoints (worsening postprocedural renal function and bleeding) were determined.ResultsAfter stratification using the SYNTAX and the euroSCORE, the preoperative characteristics were similar within the 4 groups, except for the ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE. The hybrid coronary revascularization patients were older (77 vs 65 years, P = .001). The postoperative outcomes using combined SYNTAX and the euroSCORE stratification showed a similar rate of the composite endpoint for all groups except for patients with ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE (0% for the coronary artery bypass grafting group vs 33% for the hybrid coronary revascularization group, P = .001). An analysis of the secondary endpoint showed similar results across all groups, except for in the ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE group, in which bleeding (re-exploration for bleeding and transfusion >3 packed red blood cell units per patient) was 44% in the hybrid coronary revascularization group vs 11% in the coronary artery bypass grafting group (P = .05).ConclusionsHybrid coronary revascularization is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in many patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. However, in high-risk patients with complex coronary artery disease (≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE), coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to hybrid coronary revascularization. The optimal treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease is not well established. Hybrid coronary revascularization by combining the left internal mammary artery–left anterior descending artery graft and drug-eluting stents in non–left anterior descending artery territories might offer superior results compared with sole coronary artery bypass grafting or sole percutaneous coronary intervention. We retrospectively analyzed the 30-day outcomes of 381 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 301) vs hybrid coronary revascularization (n = 80). In a 2 × 2 matrix, the 2 groups were stratified by the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (≤32 vs ≥33) and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (euroSCORE) (<5 vs ≥5). The composite endpoint (death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome) and secondary endpoints (worsening postprocedural renal function and bleeding) were determined. After stratification using the SYNTAX and the euroSCORE, the preoperative characteristics were similar within the 4 groups, except for the ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE. The hybrid coronary revascularization patients were older (77 vs 65 years, P = .001). The postoperative outcomes using combined SYNTAX and the euroSCORE stratification showed a similar rate of the composite endpoint for all groups except for patients with ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE (0% for the coronary artery bypass grafting group vs 33% for the hybrid coronary revascularization group, P = .001). An analysis of the secondary endpoint showed similar results across all groups, except for in the ≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE group, in which bleeding (re-exploration for bleeding and transfusion >3 packed red blood cell units per patient) was 44% in the hybrid coronary revascularization group vs 11% in the coronary artery bypass grafting group (P = .05). Hybrid coronary revascularization is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in many patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. However, in high-risk patients with complex coronary artery disease (≥33 SYNTAX/>5 euroSCORE), coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to hybrid coronary revascularization." @default.
• W1963977428 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1963977428 creator A5002798801 @default.
• W1963977428 creator A5028857635 @default.
• W1963977428 creator A5037921512 @default.
• W1963977428 creator A5066645479 @default.
• W1963977428 creator A5074998209 @default.
• W1963977428 creator A5085963317 @default.
• W1963977428 creator A5089759834 @default.
• W1963977428 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W1963977428 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1963977428 title "Comparison of 30-day outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery verus hybrid coronary revascularization stratified by SYNTAX and euroSCORE" @default.
• W1963977428 cites W1975509390 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2016963349 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2022331410 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2026583578 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2043011155 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2090715658 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2108349586 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2138768506 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2140991303 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2152240672 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W2154555522 @default.
• W1963977428 cites W99360717 @default.
• W1963977428 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.03.062" @default.
• W1963977428 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22541514" @default.
• W1963977428 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1963977428 type Work @default.
• W1963977428 sameAs 1963977428 @default.
• W1963977428 citedByCount "55" @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282013 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282014 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282015 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282016 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282017 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282018 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282019 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282021 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282022 @default.
• W1963977428 countsByYear W19639774282023 @default.
• W1963977428 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1963977428 hasAuthorship W1963977428A5002798801 @default.
• W1963977428 hasAuthorship W1963977428A5028857635 @default.
• W1963977428 hasAuthorship W1963977428A5037921512 @default.
• W1963977428 hasAuthorship W1963977428A5066645479 @default.
• W1963977428 hasAuthorship W1963977428A5074998209 @default.
• W1963977428 hasAuthorship W1963977428A5085963317 @default.
• W1963977428 hasAuthorship W1963977428A5089759834 @default.
• W1963977428 hasBestOaLocation W19639774281 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C2775901492 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C2778789114 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C2779040412 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C2780400711 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C126322002 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C141071460 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C164705383 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C168563851 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C203092338 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C2775901492 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C2776820930 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C2778213512 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C2778789114 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C2779040412 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C2779464278 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C2780400711 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C500558357 @default.
• W1963977428 hasConceptScore W1963977428C71924100 @default.
• W1963977428 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1963977428 hasLocation W19639774281 @default.
• W1963977428 hasLocation W19639774282 @default.
• W1963977428 hasOpenAccess W1963977428 @default.
• W1963977428 hasPrimaryLocation W19639774281 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2047880208 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2074910852 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2110542277 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2184011866 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2319819185 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2325159474 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2334320217 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2376962719 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2399063111 @default.
• W1963977428 hasRelatedWork W2919932825 @default.
• W1963977428 hasVolume "145" @default.
• W1963977428 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1963977428 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1963977428 magId "1963977428" @default.
• W1963977428 workType "article" @default.