FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1964226966> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1964226966 endingPage "22" @default.
• W1964226966 startingPage "21" @default.
• W1964226966 abstract "The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline and Embase databases were searched with no language or date restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different techniques and materials for augmenting the maxillary sinus for rehabilitation with dental implants that reported the outcome of implant success or failure at least four months after initial loading were considered. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and study risk of bias assessed. Results were expressed using fixed-effect models as there were either fewer than four studies or we used Peto odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous data when there were zero cells in either the treatment or control or both arms and the number of trials was small. Eighteen trials involving 650 patients were included. Five studies were considered to be at low risk of bias, 11 at high risk and two of unclear risk. Four trials (102 patients) evaluated short implants (5 to 8.5 mm long) as an alternative to sinus lift in bone with residual height between 4 and 9 mm. One year after loading there was insufficient evidence to claim differences between the two procedures for prosthesis failure (OR (Peto) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 2.68; three trials) or implant failure (OR (Peto) 0.44, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.99; four trials). There was however an increase in complications at treated sites when undertaking the sinus lift (OR (Peto) 4.77, 95% CI 1.79 to 12.71, P value = 0.002; four trials). Fourteen trials (548 patients) compared different sinus lift techniques. Only three comparisons included more than one trial. These were bone graft versus no bone graft, autogenous bone versus bone substitute, bone graft with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP). There was insufficient evidence to claim a benefit for any of these techniques for the primary outcomes of prosthesis and implant failure. The other comparisons with single studies were rotary versus piezosurgery to open a lateral sinus window, two different bone substitutes, use or not of a membrane to seal the lateral window, one- versus two-stage lateral sinus lift, two-stage granular bone versus one-stage autogenous bone blocks and crestal versus lateral sinus lift; two trials compared three different crestal sinus lifting techniques: rotatory versus hand malleting (patients preferred rotatory instruments over hand malleting) and hand versus electric malleting. There was no evidence of a benefit for any sinus lift procedure compared to any other for the primary outcomes prosthesis or implant failure. There is moderate quality evidence which is insufficient to determine whether sinus lift procedures in bone with residual height between 4 and 9 mm are more or less successful than placing short implants (5 to 8.5 mm) in reducing prosthesis or implant failure up to one year after loading. However, there are more complications at sites treated with sinus lift procedures. Many trials compared different sinus lift procedures and none of these indicated that one procedure reduced prosthetic or implant failures when compared to the other. Based on low quality evidence, patients may prefer rotary instruments over hand malleting for crestal sinus lift." @default.
• W1964226966 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1964226966 creator A5063411291 @default.
• W1964226966 creator A5078040151 @default.
• W1964226966 date "2015-03-01" @default.
• W1964226966 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1964226966 title "Insufficient evidence for sinus lifts over short implants for dental implant rehabilitation" @default.
• W1964226966 cites W1511085903 @default.
• W1964226966 cites W2116792097 @default.
• W1964226966 cites W2153023984 @default.
• W1964226966 cites W2182271449 @default.
• W1964226966 cites W4245354476 @default.
• W1964226966 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401081" @default.
• W1964226966 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25909937" @default.
• W1964226966 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1964226966 type Work @default.
• W1964226966 sameAs 1964226966 @default.
• W1964226966 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W1964226966 countsByYear W19642269662017 @default.
• W1964226966 countsByYear W19642269662018 @default.
• W1964226966 countsByYear W19642269662019 @default.
• W1964226966 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1964226966 hasAuthorship W1964226966A5063411291 @default.
• W1964226966 hasAuthorship W1964226966A5078040151 @default.
• W1964226966 hasBestOaLocation W19642269661 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C194887381 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C2778614594 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C2778705571 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C2779127617 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C2780338112 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C126322002 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C141071460 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C156957248 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C168563851 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C17744445 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C1862650 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C194887381 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C199343813 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C199539241 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C2778614594 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C2778705571 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C2778818304 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C2779127617 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C2779473830 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C2780338112 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C2781411149 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C44249647 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C535046627 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C71924100 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C82789193 @default.
• W1964226966 hasConceptScore W1964226966C95190672 @default.
• W1964226966 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1964226966 hasLocation W19642269661 @default.
• W1964226966 hasLocation W19642269662 @default.
• W1964226966 hasOpenAccess W1964226966 @default.
• W1964226966 hasPrimaryLocation W19642269661 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W2188278310 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W2282011068 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W2409200884 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W28127583 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W2886421374 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W3014920788 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W3021861613 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W3124275799 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W3215936151 @default.
• W1964226966 hasRelatedWork W4286235632 @default.
• W1964226966 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W1964226966 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1964226966 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1964226966 magId "1964226966" @default.
• W1964226966 workType "article" @default.