FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1964366867> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1964366867 endingPage "254" @default.
• W1964366867 startingPage "254" @default.
• W1964366867 abstract "Purpose: We compared the results of daily patching and alternate-day patching to treat amblyopia. Methods: Patients with difference in the visual acuity (VA) between the eyes of at least two lines were prescribed spectacles according to the result of cycloplegic refraction. After 4 months, 45 patients with confirmed amblyopia were randomly assigned to daily patching or alternate-day patching group. Patients were patched daily in the daily patching group (n = 24), and patched every other day in another group. The patching time was 2-6 hours according to the VA of the amblyopic eye. The parents were asked to mark on a calendar whether their child performed occlusion or not. The main outcome measure was the mean VA of amblyopic eye and compliance of occlusion after 1, 3, 6 and 9 months. The success of treatment was defined if difference of VA between the eyes was less than or equal to 1 line. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, type of amblyopia, VA of the amblyopic eye and total treatment duration. VA of the amblyopic eye was significantly improved at 1 month after occlusion in both groups. At the final visit in both groups, the number of improved VA lines in the amblyopic eye (3.8 lines:3.7 lines, p = 0.754), the final success rate (50.0%:81.0%, p = 0.060) and the compliance of occlusion (94.5%:96.3%, p = 0.803) were not different significantly, but VA of the amblyopic eye (0.2 log MAR:0.1 log MAR, p = 0.042) was better in the alternate-day patching group than that in another group. Conclusions: There was no difference in the number of improved VA lines in the amblyopic eye, nor were there differences in success rate and compliance of occlusion between the two groups. The final VA was better in the alternate-day patching group than another group. Therefore, the alternate-day patching method is another possible option for the treatment of amblyopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2015;56(2):254-262" @default.
• W1964366867 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1964366867 creator A5025370424 @default.
• W1964366867 creator A5065793501 @default.
• W1964366867 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W1964366867 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1964366867 title "Comparison of Results after Daily Patching and Alternate-Day Patching to Treat Amblyopia" @default.
• W1964366867 cites W1517334262 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W1589486570 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W179068390 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W197230158 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W1977146892 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W1977559855 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W1988266515 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2013680602 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2020559896 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2026170338 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2031219778 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2033862119 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2043315651 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2043523838 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2052499257 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2057809729 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2062343573 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2069341400 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2082935249 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2104751016 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2130758394 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2165555701 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2240213174 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2257748320 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2278302766 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2309664661 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W2992941103 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W3209969656 @default.
• W1964366867 cites W38198972 @default.
• W1964366867 doi "https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2015.56.2.254" @default.
• W1964366867 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1964366867 type Work @default.
• W1964366867 sameAs 1964366867 @default.
• W1964366867 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1964366867 countsByYear W19643668672016 @default.
• W1964366867 countsByYear W19643668672020 @default.
• W1964366867 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1964366867 hasAuthorship W1964366867A5025370424 @default.
• W1964366867 hasAuthorship W1964366867A5065793501 @default.
• W1964366867 hasBestOaLocation W19643668671 @default.
• W1964366867 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W1964366867 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W1964366867 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1964366867 hasConceptScore W1964366867C118487528 @default.
• W1964366867 hasConceptScore W1964366867C119767625 @default.
• W1964366867 hasConceptScore W1964366867C71924100 @default.
• W1964366867 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1964366867 hasLocation W19643668671 @default.
• W1964366867 hasOpenAccess W1964366867 @default.
• W1964366867 hasPrimaryLocation W19643668671 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W1025112007 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W2464763775 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W2468673121 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W2647641574 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W2993487851 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W827435971 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W831423387 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W2535027139 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W2588051742 @default.
• W1964366867 hasRelatedWork W3028789648 @default.
• W1964366867 hasVolume "56" @default.
• W1964366867 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1964366867 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1964366867 magId "1964366867" @default.
• W1964366867 workType "article" @default.