FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1964617734> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1964617734 endingPage "E531" @default.
• W1964617734 startingPage "E523" @default.
• W1964617734 abstract "The main objective of any modeling exercise is to provide a rationale for effective decision making during drug development. The aim of the current simulation experiment was to evaluate the properties of predictive check as a covariate model qualification technique and, more importantly, to introduce and evaluate alternative criteria to qualify models. Original concentration-time profiles (yod) were simulated using a 1-compartment model for an intravenous drug administered to 25 men and 25 women. The typical clearance for male subjects (TVCLm) was assumed to be 5-fold higher than that for female subjects (TVCLf). Fifty such trials under the same design were generated randomly. Predictive check was used as the model qualification tool to study predictive performance of true (males ≠ females) and false (males=females) models in the context of maximum likelihood estimation. For each yod, 200 replications were generated to study the properties of a discrepancy variable, a statistic that depends on the model, and a test statistic, a statistic that does not depend on the model. Several qualification criteria were evaluated in assessing predictive performance, such as, predictive p-value (Pp), probability of equivalence (peqv), and probability of rejecting the null hypothesis (data=model) using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (pks). The Pp value was calculated using sum of squared errors as a discrepancy variable. For both of the models, the Pp values uniformly ranged between 0 and 1. The pattern of Pp values suggests that qualification of the false model is unlikely. For both of the models, the range of peqv is about 0.95 to 1.0 for concentration at 0.5 hours. However, this is not the case for the concentration at 4 hours, which is primarily dependent on the clearance. The false model (0.35 to 0.50) has poor predictive performance compared with the true model (0.65 to 0.80) using peqv. The pks suggests no difference in the distributions of replicated and original concentrations at all of the time points for both of the models. Discrepancy variables cannot aid in rejecting false models, whereas the use of a test statistic can aid in rejecting false models. However, selection of an informative test statistic is challenging. As far as the qualification criteria are considered, the equivalence-based comparison of a test statistic is more informative than a significance-based comparison. No convincing evidence exists in the literature demonstrating the added advantages of predictive check as a routine model qualification tool over the existing tools, such as diagnostic plots or mechanistic reasoning. However, when a model is to be used for designing a trial, it should at least be able to regenerate the data used to build the model. In such cases, predictive check might offer insights into potential inconsistencies." @default.
• W1964617734 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1964617734 creator A5074871365 @default.
• W1964617734 creator A5083885025 @default.
• W1964617734 date "2005-09-01" @default.
• W1964617734 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1964617734 title "A new equivalence based metric for predictive check to qualify mixed-effects models" @default.
• W1964617734 cites W1525774039 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W1909700020 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2008192499 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2027613914 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2040011853 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2109395684 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2128775770 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2140264662 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2151729293 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W2169675402 @default.
• W1964617734 cites W4247690662 @default.
• W1964617734 doi "https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070353" @default.
• W1964617734 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2751255" @default.
• W1964617734 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16353930" @default.
• W1964617734 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1964617734 type Work @default.
• W1964617734 sameAs 1964617734 @default.
• W1964617734 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342012 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342013 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342014 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342015 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342016 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342017 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342018 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342019 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342020 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342021 @default.
• W1964617734 countsByYear W19646177342023 @default.
• W1964617734 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1964617734 hasAuthorship W1964617734A5074871365 @default.
• W1964617734 hasAuthorship W1964617734A5083885025 @default.
• W1964617734 hasBestOaLocation W19646177342 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C118615104 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C119043178 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C176217482 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C2780069185 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C3019719930 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConcept C89128539 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C105795698 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C118615104 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C119043178 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C126322002 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C127413603 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C149782125 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C151730666 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C176217482 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C21547014 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C2779343474 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C2780069185 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C3019719930 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C33923547 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C71924100 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C86803240 @default.
• W1964617734 hasConceptScore W1964617734C89128539 @default.
• W1964617734 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1964617734 hasLocation W19646177341 @default.
• W1964617734 hasLocation W19646177342 @default.
• W1964617734 hasLocation W19646177343 @default.
• W1964617734 hasLocation W19646177344 @default.
• W1964617734 hasOpenAccess W1964617734 @default.
• W1964617734 hasPrimaryLocation W19646177341 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W1531601525 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W2096089271 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W2511384863 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W2923628599 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W2948807893 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W2985746494 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W3173606202 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W4206042385 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W2778153218 @default.
• W1964617734 hasRelatedWork W3110381201 @default.
• W1964617734 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W1964617734 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1964617734 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1964617734 magId "1964617734" @default.
• W1964617734 workType "article" @default.