FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1964659968> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1964659968 endingPage "239" @default.
• W1964659968 startingPage "236" @default.
• W1964659968 abstract "Background Multiple approaches are needed to improve urinary catheter use and sustain compliance with the appropriate indications for catheter use. Methods We evaluated the effect of 3 interventions over 5 years: a nurse-driven multidisciplinary effort for early urinary catheter removal, an intervention in an emergency department to promote appropriate placement, and twice-weekly assessment of urinary catheter prevalence with periodic feedback on performance for nonintensive care units. We also assessed the views of bedside nurses, case managers, and nurse managers with respect to appropriate catheter use, how often need is assessed, and who they consider responsible for the evaluation of urinary catheter need. Results There was a significant reduction in urinary catheter use from 17.3%-12.7% during the 5-year period (linear regression with time as independent variable, R2, 0.61; P < .0001). Of bedside nurses responding to the questionnaire, 222 of 227 (97.8%) identified themselves as responsible or as sharing the responsibility for catheter necessity evaluation, 223 of 229 (97.4%) were confident in their knowledge, and 166 of 222 (74.8%) viewed physicians as receptive to their requests for catheter removal >70% of the time. Conclusions A multifaceted approach to promote appropriate urinary catheter use is associated with sustained reductions in catheter use. Bedside nurses view themselves responsible for the evaluation of catheter presence and need. Multiple approaches are needed to improve urinary catheter use and sustain compliance with the appropriate indications for catheter use. We evaluated the effect of 3 interventions over 5 years: a nurse-driven multidisciplinary effort for early urinary catheter removal, an intervention in an emergency department to promote appropriate placement, and twice-weekly assessment of urinary catheter prevalence with periodic feedback on performance for nonintensive care units. We also assessed the views of bedside nurses, case managers, and nurse managers with respect to appropriate catheter use, how often need is assessed, and who they consider responsible for the evaluation of urinary catheter need. There was a significant reduction in urinary catheter use from 17.3%-12.7% during the 5-year period (linear regression with time as independent variable, R2, 0.61; P < .0001). Of bedside nurses responding to the questionnaire, 222 of 227 (97.8%) identified themselves as responsible or as sharing the responsibility for catheter necessity evaluation, 223 of 229 (97.4%) were confident in their knowledge, and 166 of 222 (74.8%) viewed physicians as receptive to their requests for catheter removal >70% of the time. A multifaceted approach to promote appropriate urinary catheter use is associated with sustained reductions in catheter use. Bedside nurses view themselves responsible for the evaluation of catheter presence and need." @default.
• W1964659968 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1964659968 creator A5021633072 @default.
• W1964659968 creator A5043799859 @default.
• W1964659968 creator A5083685165 @default.
• W1964659968 creator A5086814137 @default.
• W1964659968 creator A5090699266 @default.
• W1964659968 date "2013-03-01" @default.
• W1964659968 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1964659968 title "Sustained reductions in urinary catheter use over 5 years: Bedside nurses view themselves responsible for evaluation of catheter necessity" @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2007047945 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2009396042 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2009563282 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2015534798 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2016505047 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2045264633 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2061486419 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2064853665 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2096455278 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2129486831 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2129505857 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2130529290 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2138590084 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2157298517 @default.
• W1964659968 cites W2187790984 @default.
• W1964659968 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.328" @default.
• W1964659968 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22980514" @default.
• W1964659968 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1964659968 type Work @default.
• W1964659968 sameAs 1964659968 @default.
• W1964659968 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682013 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682014 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682015 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682016 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682017 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682018 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682019 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682021 @default.
• W1964659968 countsByYear W19646599682022 @default.
• W1964659968 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1964659968 hasAuthorship W1964659968A5021633072 @default.
• W1964659968 hasAuthorship W1964659968A5043799859 @default.
• W1964659968 hasAuthorship W1964659968A5083685165 @default.
• W1964659968 hasAuthorship W1964659968A5086814137 @default.
• W1964659968 hasAuthorship W1964659968A5090699266 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C22467394 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C2781267111 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C2993006401 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C126322002 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C141071460 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C144024400 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C159110408 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C177713679 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C194828623 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C22467394 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C27415008 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C2780665704 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C2781267111 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C2993006401 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C36289849 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C71924100 @default.
• W1964659968 hasConceptScore W1964659968C77411442 @default.
• W1964659968 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1964659968 hasLocation W19646599681 @default.
• W1964659968 hasLocation W19646599682 @default.
• W1964659968 hasOpenAccess W1964659968 @default.
• W1964659968 hasPrimaryLocation W19646599681 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W1141637856 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W2012553523 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W2364553491 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W3011386288 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W3096201432 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W3201679234 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W3208172612 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W4306362223 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W9467451 @default.
• W1964659968 hasRelatedWork W2781124182 @default.
• W1964659968 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W1964659968 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1964659968 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1964659968 magId "1964659968" @default.
• W1964659968 workType "article" @default.