FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1964901648> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1964901648 endingPage "1133" @default.
• W1964901648 startingPage "1126" @default.
• W1964901648 abstract "Background: Smile esthetics have been shown to play a major role in the perception of whether a person is attractive, and whether they are perceived as friendly, trustworthy, intelligent, and self‐confident. A proposed major determinant of the esthetics of a smile is the amount of gingival display, which can be excessive in cases of altered passive eruption. The aim of this study is to see whether altering the amount of gingival display of patients would affect dental professionals’ and laypersons’ perceptions of the aforementioned social parameters. Methods: Patients were identified as having altered passive eruption and excessive gingival display. Smiling “control” photographs were taken and then digitally altered so as to lengthen the teeth and thus reduce the amount of gingival display. These became the “test” photographs. The control and test photographs were shown in random order. The control group of evaluators consisted of senior dental students, and the test group of evaluators comprised students who had no formal dental training. Groups were asked to rate, on a visual analog scale, each picture's attractiveness, friendliness, trustworthiness, intelligence, and self‐confidence. Results: The test pictures with less gingival display were consistently and statistically significantly rated higher for all five social parameters than were their control counterparts ( P <0.0001). When analyzed as an isolated effect, there were no statistically significant differences between the control group and the test group of evaluators when rating the pictures. Pictures depicting African Americans were judged to be more trustworthy ( P = 0.0467) and self‐confident ( P = 0.0490) than pictures depicting white individuals. Pictures depicting women were judged to be more trustworthy ( P = 0.0159) and intelligent ( P = 0.0329) than pictures depicting men. All the social parameters were positively and statistically significantly correlated with each other ( P <0.0001). Conclusions: Excessive gingival display did negatively affect how attractive a person's smile is judged to be. In addition, how friendly, trustworthy, intelligent, and self‐confident a person was perceived to be was inversely related to the amount of gingival display. Untrained laypeople were just as sensitive to these differences as senior dental students." @default.
• W1964901648 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1964901648 creator A5004028804 @default.
• W1964901648 creator A5057707504 @default.
• W1964901648 creator A5062420754 @default.
• W1964901648 creator A5063435058 @default.
• W1964901648 creator A5068239227 @default.
• W1964901648 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W1964901648 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1964901648 title "The Effect of Esthetic Crown Lengthening on Perceptions of a Patient's Attractiveness, Friendliness, Trustworthiness, Intelligence, and Self‐Confidence" @default.
• W1964901648 cites W1509768810 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W1966655288 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W1971001845 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W1981398747 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W1982662025 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W1983860613 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2006390317 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2008491228 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2013001164 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2015362517 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2016007536 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2033072194 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2038809913 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2043649947 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2066830081 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2067716754 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2076013763 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2086425666 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2088165831 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2095705798 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2111300637 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2148305055 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2150896487 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2151932125 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2159371300 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2161046132 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W2171099065 @default.
• W1964901648 cites W4293195992 @default.
• W1964901648 doi "https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120403" @default.
• W1964901648 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23137007" @default.
• W1964901648 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1964901648 type Work @default.
• W1964901648 sameAs 1964901648 @default.
• W1964901648 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482014 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482015 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482016 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482017 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482018 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482020 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482021 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482022 @default.
• W1964901648 countsByYear W19649016482023 @default.
• W1964901648 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1964901648 hasAuthorship W1964901648A5004028804 @default.
• W1964901648 hasAuthorship W1964901648A5057707504 @default.
• W1964901648 hasAuthorship W1964901648A5062420754 @default.
• W1964901648 hasAuthorship W1964901648A5063435058 @default.
• W1964901648 hasAuthorship W1964901648A5068239227 @default.
• W1964901648 hasBestOaLocation W19649016482 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C153701036 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C2776086947 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C31173074 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C11171543 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C151730666 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C153701036 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C154945302 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C15744967 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C169760540 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C199343813 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C26760741 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C2775924081 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C2776035688 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C2776086947 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C2777267654 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C29694066 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C31173074 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C41008148 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C46312422 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C71924100 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C77805123 @default.
• W1964901648 hasConceptScore W1964901648C86803240 @default.

• next