FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965092837> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965092837 endingPage "195" @default.
• W1965092837 startingPage "194" @default.
• W1965092837 abstract "Alexander and Fardell report the use of remifentanil for tracheal intubation for a Caesarean section in a patient with succinylcholine apnoea [1]. It is encouraging that airway management was successful, but their technique raises some issues. The authors used an infusion of remifentanil at 0.25 μg.kg−1 min−1 followed by a bolus of 0.5 μg.kg−1. The optimal dose of remifentanil for intubation without the use of neuromuscular blockade has not been determined. The dose regimen reported is markedly different from those previously described in the literature for intubation without the use of neuromuscular blockade. McNeil and colleagues demonstrated that remifentanil 4 μg.kg−1 combined with propofol was required to produce intubating conditions comparable to succinylcholine [2]. This dose of remifentanil was associated with significant cardiovascular depression and a mean duration of apnoea of 12.8 min. Some authors have noted that doses of 2 μg.kg−1 provide good intubating conditions in 80–90% of elective patients, whereas others have stated that doses of 4 μg.kg−1 are required [3]. Whether a success rate of 80–90% is adequate during a rapid sequence induction is questionable. Failure to intubate even with doses as high as 3–4 μg.kg−1 has been described. Klemola found that in patients given propofol and remifentanil 3 μg.kg−1 or 4 μg.kg−1, tracheal intubation was not possible in 25% and 5% of cases, respectively [4]. Most studies using remifentanil for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockers have used propofol as the induction agent and thiopental may not provide similar intubating conditions. Erhan and colleagues showed that propofol 2 mg.kg−1 provided significantly better intubating conditions than thiopental 6 mg.kg−1 when combined with remifentanil 3 μg.kg−1[5]. Acceptable intubating conditions were found in only 67% of patients in the thiopental group and 20% of patients could not be intubated at the first attempt. Durumus et al. showed that only doses of 4 μg.kg−1 of remifentanil provided ‘excellent’ or ‘satisfactory’ intubating conditions when combined with thiopental 5 mg.kg−1[6]. There is limited data on the use of remifentanil during rapid sequence induction. Haughton and colleagues described the successful use of propofol with remifentanil 4 μg.kg−1 in a trauma patient with a family history of malignant hyperpyrexia [7]. Airway management for obstetric anaesthesia must be safe, effective and reliable. The drugs and dosages used by Alexander and Fardell may not work for other patients. Even though recovery from neuromuscular blockade would be prolonged, an intubation strategy using succinylcholine or rocuronium is an appropriate choice for the case described." @default.
• W1965092837 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965092837 creator A5052290371 @default.
• W1965092837 creator A5060918972 @default.
• W1965092837 creator A5084133582 @default.
• W1965092837 date "2006-02-01" @default.
• W1965092837 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1965092837 title "Remifentanil for tracheal intubation" @default.
• W1965092837 cites W1871839128 @default.
• W1965092837 cites W1998723567 @default.
• W1965092837 cites W2007518628 @default.
• W1965092837 cites W2027990259 @default.
• W1965092837 cites W2089535567 @default.
• W1965092837 cites W2092985226 @default.
• W1965092837 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04521_2.x" @default.
• W1965092837 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16430580" @default.
• W1965092837 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1965092837 type Work @default.
• W1965092837 sameAs 1965092837 @default.
• W1965092837 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1965092837 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965092837 hasAuthorship W1965092837A5052290371 @default.
• W1965092837 hasAuthorship W1965092837A5060918972 @default.
• W1965092837 hasAuthorship W1965092837A5084133582 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C2776277131 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C2778029997 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C2778891214 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C2909465803 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C43376680 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C141071460 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C2776277131 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C2778029997 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C2778716859 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C2778891214 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C2909465803 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C42219234 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C43376680 @default.
• W1965092837 hasConceptScore W1965092837C71924100 @default.
• W1965092837 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1965092837 hasLocation W19650928371 @default.
• W1965092837 hasLocation W19650928372 @default.
• W1965092837 hasOpenAccess W1965092837 @default.
• W1965092837 hasPrimaryLocation W19650928371 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W1506416527 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W1997790758 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W2115949996 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W2127590950 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W2138823466 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W2139149156 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W2145095371 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W2382273883 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W2392079344 @default.
• W1965092837 hasRelatedWork W45295206 @default.
• W1965092837 hasVolume "61" @default.
• W1965092837 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1965092837 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1965092837 magId "1965092837" @default.
• W1965092837 workType "article" @default.