FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965202208> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965202208 endingPage "771" @default.
• W1965202208 startingPage "768" @default.
• W1965202208 abstract "Objective This study evaluated the performance of a standardized grading system for scleritis using standard digital photographs. Design Cross-sectional interobserver agreement study. Participants Photo archives from the National Eye Institute. Methods Three uveitis specialists from 3 different centers graded 79 randomly arranged images of the sclera with various degrees of inflammation. Grading was done using standard screen resolution (1024×768 pixels) on a 0 to 4+ scale in 2 sessions: (1) without using reference photographs and (2) with reference to a set of standard photographs (proposed grading system). The graders were masked to the order of images, and the order of images was randomized. Interobserver agreement in grading the severity of inflammation with and without the use of grading system was evaluated. Main Outcome Measures Interobserver agreement. Results The proposed grading system for assessing activity in scleritis demonstrated a good interobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement (pooled κ) was poor (0.289) without photographic guidance and improved substantially when the “grading system” with standardized photographs was used (κ = 0.603). Conclusions This system of standardized images for scleritis grading provides significantly more consistent grading of scleral inflammation in this study and has clear applications in clinical settings and clinical research. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. This study evaluated the performance of a standardized grading system for scleritis using standard digital photographs. Cross-sectional interobserver agreement study. Photo archives from the National Eye Institute. Three uveitis specialists from 3 different centers graded 79 randomly arranged images of the sclera with various degrees of inflammation. Grading was done using standard screen resolution (1024×768 pixels) on a 0 to 4+ scale in 2 sessions: (1) without using reference photographs and (2) with reference to a set of standard photographs (proposed grading system). The graders were masked to the order of images, and the order of images was randomized. Interobserver agreement in grading the severity of inflammation with and without the use of grading system was evaluated. Interobserver agreement. The proposed grading system for assessing activity in scleritis demonstrated a good interobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement (pooled κ) was poor (0.289) without photographic guidance and improved substantially when the “grading system” with standardized photographs was used (κ = 0.603). This system of standardized images for scleritis grading provides significantly more consistent grading of scleral inflammation in this study and has clear applications in clinical settings and clinical research." @default.
• W1965202208 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965202208 creator A5016920591 @default.
• W1965202208 creator A5027427092 @default.
• W1965202208 creator A5030540230 @default.
• W1965202208 creator A5031654603 @default.
• W1965202208 creator A5040200688 @default.
• W1965202208 creator A5041124754 @default.
• W1965202208 creator A5066556137 @default.
• W1965202208 date "2011-04-01" @default.
• W1965202208 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1965202208 title "A Standardized Grading System for Scleritis" @default.
• W1965202208 cites W2037162457 @default.
• W1965202208 cites W2047901258 @default.
• W1965202208 cites W2069808402 @default.
• W1965202208 cites W2107144199 @default.
• W1965202208 cites W2108832576 @default.
• W1965202208 cites W2139499737 @default.
• W1965202208 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W1965202208 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.027" @default.
• W1965202208 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3070789" @default.
• W1965202208 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21093921" @default.
• W1965202208 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1965202208 type Work @default.
• W1965202208 sameAs 1965202208 @default.
• W1965202208 citedByCount "81" @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082012 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082013 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082014 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082015 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082016 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082017 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082018 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082019 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082020 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082021 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082022 @default.
• W1965202208 countsByYear W19652022082023 @default.
• W1965202208 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965202208 hasAuthorship W1965202208A5016920591 @default.
• W1965202208 hasAuthorship W1965202208A5027427092 @default.
• W1965202208 hasAuthorship W1965202208A5030540230 @default.
• W1965202208 hasAuthorship W1965202208A5031654603 @default.
• W1965202208 hasAuthorship W1965202208A5040200688 @default.
• W1965202208 hasAuthorship W1965202208A5041124754 @default.
• W1965202208 hasAuthorship W1965202208A5066556137 @default.
• W1965202208 hasBestOaLocation W19652022082 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C2776194053 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C2777100477 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C2781053147 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C118487528 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C119767625 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C127413603 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C147176958 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C2776194053 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C2777100477 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C2777286243 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C2781053147 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C2989005 @default.
• W1965202208 hasConceptScore W1965202208C71924100 @default.
• W1965202208 hasFunder F4320337350 @default.
• W1965202208 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1965202208 hasLocation W19652022081 @default.
• W1965202208 hasLocation W19652022082 @default.
• W1965202208 hasLocation W19652022083 @default.
• W1965202208 hasLocation W19652022084 @default.
• W1965202208 hasOpenAccess W1965202208 @default.
• W1965202208 hasPrimaryLocation W19652022081 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W1528990089 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W1721887641 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W1965202208 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W2007424746 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W2040870561 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W2050302657 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W2415193126 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W2594902197 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W2953983223 @default.
• W1965202208 hasRelatedWork W4244231230 @default.
• W1965202208 hasVolume "118" @default.
• W1965202208 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1965202208 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1965202208 magId "1965202208" @default.
• W1965202208 workType "article" @default.