FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965397777> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965397777 endingPage "221" @default.
• W1965397777 startingPage "215" @default.
• W1965397777 abstract "Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the added value of robotic surgery for radical cystectomy in the context of an established enhanced recovery programme (ERP). Background: We have previously reported on ERP in open radical cystectomy (ORC) and shown that it is safe and not associated with an increase in complications or readmissions. Further, it is associated with reductions in ICU stay, length of hospital stay and duration of postoperative ileus. The recent introduction of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), with its perceived benefit of minimal invasiveness, has led to the question of whether patients who have their radical cystectomy in the environment of ERP would experience an added benefit if the surgery were performed robotically. We implemented the ERP for all patients undergoing radical cystectomy in 2008. In 2010 we started to offer RARC as the first line treatment for all bladder cancer patients with an indication for bladder extirpation. In this study we compare the perioperative results of the last 50 RARC patients with the last 50 ORC. The same ERP protocol was implemented in all patients. Patients and methods: We used our prospectively kept electronic database to identify the last 50 ORC and 50 RARC patients (we excluded the first 10 RARC in our series to reduce learning curve effect). We compared preoperative (age, sex, comorbidity), intraoperative (diversion type, fluid loss, blood transfusion, conversion and number of lymph node dissections (LND)) and post-operative (length of stay LOS, nodal yield and pathological T stage) variables. We also reported on the 30 day complications according to Clavien–Dindo classification. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in their preoperative variables, number of LND performed and pathological T and N stage. Patients in the RARC arm were more likely to have continent diversion and had significantly less intraoperative fluid loss. LOS and lymph nodal yield was no worse in the RARC cohort in comparison to the ORC patients. The RARC patients had significantly lower transfusion rates and overall 30-day complication rates. Conclusions: We have shown that robotic surgery offers an added value to patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in addition to the benefits gained from enrolling in an ERP. This is likely due to the minimally invasive nature of robotic surgery, and thus an attenuation of its physiological insult, which is the cornerstone of ERP theory." @default.
• W1965397777 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965397777 creator A5025426969 @default.
• W1965397777 creator A5034301429 @default.
• W1965397777 creator A5036833504 @default.
• W1965397777 creator A5039854501 @default.
• W1965397777 creator A5047481252 @default.
• W1965397777 creator A5063347247 @default.
• W1965397777 creator A5077112149 @default.
• W1965397777 date "2014-11-03" @default.
• W1965397777 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1965397777 title "Comparative outcomes of open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy in an enhanced recovery programme era" @default.
• W1965397777 cites W1614222331 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W1965800285 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W1980747032 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W1981848166 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2008523684 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2039903652 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2041970454 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2063390384 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2080347356 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2082988198 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2094806967 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2096835959 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2100071937 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2100480913 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2133092139 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2139963921 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2146995189 @default.
• W1965397777 cites W2158148231 @default.
• W1965397777 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415814553650" @default.
• W1965397777 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1965397777 type Work @default.
• W1965397777 sameAs 1965397777 @default.
• W1965397777 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1965397777 countsByYear W19653977772018 @default.
• W1965397777 countsByYear W19653977772019 @default.
• W1965397777 countsByYear W19653977772020 @default.
• W1965397777 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965397777 hasAuthorship W1965397777A5025426969 @default.
• W1965397777 hasAuthorship W1965397777A5034301429 @default.
• W1965397777 hasAuthorship W1965397777A5036833504 @default.
• W1965397777 hasAuthorship W1965397777A5039854501 @default.
• W1965397777 hasAuthorship W1965397777A5047481252 @default.
• W1965397777 hasAuthorship W1965397777A5063347247 @default.
• W1965397777 hasAuthorship W1965397777A5077112149 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C103203806 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C2775910329 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C2777125728 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C2777284795 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C2780352672 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C103203806 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C121608353 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C126322002 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C141071460 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C151730666 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C2775910329 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C2777125728 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C2777284795 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C2779343474 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C2780352672 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C2780849966 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C31174226 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C61434518 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C71924100 @default.
• W1965397777 hasConceptScore W1965397777C86803240 @default.
• W1965397777 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1965397777 hasLocation W19653977771 @default.
• W1965397777 hasOpenAccess W1965397777 @default.
• W1965397777 hasPrimaryLocation W19653977771 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W1947480581 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W2002209526 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W2007927699 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W2056837032 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W2513367255 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W2997397490 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W3022427129 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W3031380660 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W3165344163 @default.
• W1965397777 hasRelatedWork W4207080129 @default.
• W1965397777 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W1965397777 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1965397777 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1965397777 magId "1965397777" @default.
• W1965397777 workType "article" @default.