FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965465765> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965465765 endingPage "442" @default.
• W1965465765 startingPage "434" @default.
• W1965465765 abstract "OBJECTIVE Endovascular coiling has been used increasingly as an alternative to neurosurgical clipping for treating subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to aneurysm rupture. The aim of the present study was to provide a prospective, longitudinal investigation into cognitive function in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with either neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling. METHODS Twenty-three patients who were treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London, England, were recruited prospectively. Twelve patients who underwent surgical clipping were compared with a group of 11 patients who underwent endovascular coiling. All patients underwent a comprehensive, standardized neuropsychological assessment using the same battery of tests at the acute stage (within 2 wk after treatment). All patients who underwent coiling and 11 of the 12 patients who underwent clipping were reassessed at the post-acute long-term follow-up (6 mo) stage. RESULTS Group comparisons at the acute assessment revealed a significant difference favoring coiling patients on only one measure of verbal recall. However, there were no other significant differences between the groups at this stage. At the post-acute assessment, the clipped group performed better than the coiled group on measures of intellectual functioning (P < 0.05), although no other differences were found on a range of cognitive tests. Intragroup comparisons between the acute and post-acute assessments found equivocal, significant improvements in measures of intellectual functioning, memory, executive functions, and speed of information processing in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION We argue that there are minimal differences in the long-term cognitive outcome between endovascular coiling and surgical clipping. In the acute phase after treatment, we suggest that coiled patients, having been spared neurosurgical intervention, may have a slightly better cognitive outcome than clipped patients. However, these differences level off and both groups of patients ultimately experience widespread improvement in cognitive functioning by the post-acute stage of recovery." @default.
• W1965465765 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965465765 creator A5002482067 @default.
• W1965465765 creator A5007213959 @default.
• W1965465765 creator A5018745242 @default.
• W1965465765 creator A5047854292 @default.
• W1965465765 date "2007-03-01" @default.
• W1965465765 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1965465765 title "COILING VERSUS CLIPPING FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANEURYSMAL SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE" @default.
• W1965465765 cites W1874700596 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W1967188868 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W1977315588 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W1987456844 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2003824819 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2012633010 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2048849244 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2064329256 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2080851888 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2091893882 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2107655025 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2108086940 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2148567819 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2150825819 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2158621978 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2159542358 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2165852737 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W2475147976 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W4243834324 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W4246122903 @default.
• W1965465765 cites W4376596193 @default.
• W1965465765 doi "https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000255335.72662.25" @default.
• W1965465765 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17327787" @default.
• W1965465765 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1965465765 type Work @default.
• W1965465765 sameAs 1965465765 @default.
• W1965465765 citedByCount "69" @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652012 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652013 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652014 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652015 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652016 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652017 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652018 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652019 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652020 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652022 @default.
• W1965465765 countsByYear W19654657652023 @default.
• W1965465765 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965465765 hasAuthorship W1965465765A5002482067 @default.
• W1965465765 hasAuthorship W1965465765A5007213959 @default.
• W1965465765 hasAuthorship W1965465765A5018745242 @default.
• W1965465765 hasAuthorship W1965465765A5047854292 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C12770488 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C14216870 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C16568411 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C2776848632 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C2777736543 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C2779905414 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C3018386432 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C118552586 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C12770488 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C138885662 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C141071460 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C14216870 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C16568411 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C169900460 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C188816634 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C2776098176 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C2776848632 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C2777736543 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C2779905414 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C3018386432 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C41895202 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C42219234 @default.
• W1965465765 hasConceptScore W1965465765C71924100 @default.
• W1965465765 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1965465765 hasLocation W19654657651 @default.
• W1965465765 hasLocation W19654657652 @default.
• W1965465765 hasOpenAccess W1965465765 @default.
• W1965465765 hasPrimaryLocation W19654657651 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W2020119635 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W2028838229 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W2045626793 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W2114241827 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W2322567327 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W2476338556 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W2756142510 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W292847579 @default.
• W1965465765 hasRelatedWork W3039960245 @default.

• next