FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965535973> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965535973 endingPage "36" @default.
• W1965535973 startingPage "26" @default.
• W1965535973 abstract "When exposed to novel food during food transitions, growing pigs often elicit a neophobic response that is responsible for decreased food consumption. Flavour preference conditioning may represent an interesting way to reduce neophobia and improve food intake in growing pigs. The present series of experiments investigated the pig's conditioned preference for a flavoured beverage added with different carbohydrates and sweeteners and the possible transition of those beverage-induced preferences to flavoured solid food. In Experiment 1A, nine juvenile pigs were given three two-day conditioning sessions: they received a flavoured beverage added with 1.125% sucrose (F + S1.125) and a second flavoured beverage with no additive (F−). In Experiment 1B, nine juvenile pigs were given six two-day conditioning sessions: they received a flavoured beverage added with 10% sucrose (F + S10) and a second flavoured beverage with no additive (F−). In subsequent two-choice drinking tests, the pigs exhibited no clear-cut preference for F + S1.125, whereas F + S10 was preferred compared to F− (P < 0.05) but only during the first subsequent two-choice drinking tests, suggesting that pigs developed a short-term preference for the flavour previously paired with 10% but not 1.125% sucrose. The Experiment 2 was conducted to assess the independent effects of visceral (caloric intake) and gustative (sweet taste) reinforcement in flavour preference conditioning. Nine juvenile pigs were subjected to four three-day conditioning sessions: they received flavoured beverages added with 2.25% maltodextrin (F + m, caloric intake), 0.37% saccharin (F + s, sweet taste), or no additive (F−). During further two-choice drinking tests, no clear-cut preference emerged, but the consumption of F + m was 107% and 35% higher than that of F− and F + s, respectively. Despite pigs exhibited some conditioned flavour preferences during two-choice drinking tests in Experiments 1B and 2, no clear-cut preference was observed during two-choice feeding tests with flavoured solid food. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of the combination and/or synergy between gustative and visceral reinforcements for conditioned flavour preference and suggest that a visceral reinforcement via maltodextrin might be sufficient to condition such a preference. Moreover, the absence of clear-cut preference during two-choice feeding test illustrates the difficulty to transpose a flavour preference acquired via a sweet beverage to solid food. Further studies are needed to investigate the failure of saccharin-conditioned preference in pigs." @default.
• W1965535973 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965535973 creator A5029368469 @default.
• W1965535973 creator A5033830173 @default.
• W1965535973 creator A5037016344 @default.
• W1965535973 creator A5066498390 @default.
• W1965535973 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1965535973 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W1965535973 title "Flavour preference acquired via a beverage-induced conditioning and its transposition to solid food: Sucrose but not maltodextrin or saccharin induced significant flavour preferences in pigs" @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1963591746 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1968490043 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1972177241 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1972577459 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1972959976 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1974490071 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1977176053 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1977343242 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1979251072 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1989073630 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1989182618 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1995289248 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W1999408156 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2006026432 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2006787190 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2013239319 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2023680330 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2024007773 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2025902507 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2026963092 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2027612458 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2028411634 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2029094094 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2031373268 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2032864065 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2035384351 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2039969395 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2040087292 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2040840559 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2042672854 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2046376078 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2050023437 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2056061096 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2058650438 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2064889878 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2066725447 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2069415022 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2072820746 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2075423375 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2079573200 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2081260629 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2084160726 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2085703827 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2090611337 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2097589837 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2103000742 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2108542203 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2121107374 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2127969977 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2131305287 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2132269687 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2132373674 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2138703949 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2144768265 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2145465887 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2146600835 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2156920750 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2158486225 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W2170438912 @default.
• W1965535973 cites W3044859531 @default.
• W1965535973 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.11.007" @default.
• W1965535973 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1965535973 type Work @default.
• W1965535973 sameAs 1965535973 @default.
• W1965535973 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732012 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732014 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732015 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732017 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732018 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732019 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732020 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732021 @default.
• W1965535973 countsByYear W19655359732023 @default.
• W1965535973 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965535973 hasAuthorship W1965535973A5029368469 @default.
• W1965535973 hasAuthorship W1965535973A5033830173 @default.
• W1965535973 hasAuthorship W1965535973A5037016344 @default.
• W1965535973 hasAuthorship W1965535973A5066498390 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C16281581 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C2777846834 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C2778597767 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C2779147919 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C2779587474 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W1965535973 hasConcept C31903555 @default.

• next