FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965593796> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965593796 endingPage "582.e2" @default.
• W1965593796 startingPage "577" @default.
• W1965593796 abstract "ObjectiveTo determine whether “pregnancy rate (PR) per thawed embryo,” accounting for embryo losses, is more relevant than “PR per ET,” generally used in the literature for expressing embryo cryopreservation results.DesignSystematic review.SettingUniversity teaching hospital.Patient(s)None.Intervention(s)Analysis of reports from January 1983 to February 2009 involving thawing of human cryopreserved embryos. Of the 1,275 articles that were initially identified, 102 met the inclusion criteria.Main Outcome Measure(s)Comparisons between PR per ET and PR per thawed embryo, contribution of embryo loss to PR.Result(s)Overall PR, expressed per ET and per thawed embryo, was compared according to the different freezing speeds and cryoprotectants used. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences for four comparisons with one approach to expressing results, not identified with the other. All other statistical analyses gave similar results whichever way the results were expressed. The rate of thawed transferred embryos, a measure accounting for embryo losses, is a good prognostic factor for PR.Conclusion(s)Statistical analysis accounting for embryo losses can give results different from those published in the literature. Consequently, the clinical PR per thawed embryo may be a more informative measure for accurate analysis of practices. To determine whether “pregnancy rate (PR) per thawed embryo,” accounting for embryo losses, is more relevant than “PR per ET,” generally used in the literature for expressing embryo cryopreservation results. Systematic review. University teaching hospital. None. Analysis of reports from January 1983 to February 2009 involving thawing of human cryopreserved embryos. Of the 1,275 articles that were initially identified, 102 met the inclusion criteria. Comparisons between PR per ET and PR per thawed embryo, contribution of embryo loss to PR. Overall PR, expressed per ET and per thawed embryo, was compared according to the different freezing speeds and cryoprotectants used. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences for four comparisons with one approach to expressing results, not identified with the other. All other statistical analyses gave similar results whichever way the results were expressed. The rate of thawed transferred embryos, a measure accounting for embryo losses, is a good prognostic factor for PR. Statistical analysis accounting for embryo losses can give results different from those published in the literature. Consequently, the clinical PR per thawed embryo may be a more informative measure for accurate analysis of practices." @default.
• W1965593796 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965593796 creator A5015356337 @default.
• W1965593796 creator A5039007127 @default.
• W1965593796 creator A5081089849 @default.
• W1965593796 creator A5083524935 @default.
• W1965593796 date "2011-02-01" @default.
• W1965593796 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W1965593796 title "Embryo cryopreservation: proposal for a new indicator of efficiency" @default.
• W1965593796 cites W1490369731 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W1999176925 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2006970792 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2017832502 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2035365469 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2048068393 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2080242833 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2101444657 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2106630628 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2116407385 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2117950946 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2120465760 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2127061823 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2134057753 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2135290162 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2147048764 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2148106614 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2169528843 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2169787459 @default.
• W1965593796 cites W2240341696 @default.
• W1965593796 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.040" @default.
• W1965593796 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20599194" @default.
• W1965593796 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1965593796 type Work @default.
• W1965593796 sameAs 1965593796 @default.
• W1965593796 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1965593796 countsByYear W19655937962012 @default.
• W1965593796 countsByYear W19655937962013 @default.
• W1965593796 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965593796 hasAuthorship W1965593796A5015356337 @default.
• W1965593796 hasAuthorship W1965593796A5039007127 @default.
• W1965593796 hasAuthorship W1965593796A5081089849 @default.
• W1965593796 hasAuthorship W1965593796A5083524935 @default.
• W1965593796 hasBestOaLocation W19655937961 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C16685009 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C179933525 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C196843134 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C2776537878 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C59843425 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C68528507 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C16685009 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C179933525 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C196843134 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C2776537878 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C2779234561 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C29456083 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C54355233 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C59843425 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C68528507 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C71924100 @default.
• W1965593796 hasConceptScore W1965593796C86803240 @default.
• W1965593796 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1965593796 hasLocation W19655937961 @default.
• W1965593796 hasLocation W19655937962 @default.
• W1965593796 hasOpenAccess W1965593796 @default.
• W1965593796 hasPrimaryLocation W19655937961 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W1185765933 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W1970809017 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2002703454 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2024913889 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2039428748 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2048761700 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2266940243 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2291928773 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2359660373 @default.
• W1965593796 hasRelatedWork W2420319344 @default.
• W1965593796 hasVolume "95" @default.
• W1965593796 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1965593796 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1965593796 magId "1965593796" @default.
• W1965593796 workType "article" @default.