FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965767798> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965767798 endingPage "1967" @default.
• W1965767798 startingPage "1963" @default.
• W1965767798 abstract "The aim of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the synergistic sedation with a low dose of midazolam combined with propofol versus the standard regimen of midazolam and pethidine for conscious sedation in colonoscopy in a group of patients that included a sufficient number of elderly patients with several comorbidities.A total of 120 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy in a prospective study were randomly assigned to one of two medication regimens (55 patients were over 65 yr). Patients in group A (n = 64) received i.v. 2 mg (<70 kg b.w.) or 3 mg (>70 kg b.w.) of midazolam and a median dose of 80 mg of propofol (range 40-150). Patients in group B (n = 56) received i.v. a median dose of 5 mg of midazolam (range 3-7) and 75 mg of pethidine (range 50-125). The patient's comfort level was assessed by a 4-point scale 24 h after the procedure. The time to recover from sedation was assessed at 5, 10, and 30 min after the procedure by using the Aldrete score.Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that among sex, age, duration of the test, American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status Classification grade, and the sort of sedation, the synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol was the only factor associated with a higher level of patient comfort (chi2 = 5.5, p < 0.05). Additional multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that among sex, age, duration of the test, American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status Classification grade, and the sort of sedation, the synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol was the only factor associated with a quicker patient recovery time (chi2 = 24.5, p < 0.01; chi2 = 51.7, p < 0.01; chi2 = 148.4, p < 0.01 for Aldrete in 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min, respectively). The endoscopist's evaluation of patient sedation and cardiorespiratory parameters were similar in both groups and in all age groups.Our data suggest that the synergistic sedation with a low dose of midazolam combined with propofol was superior to a standard combination of midazolam and the opioid pethidine for colonoscopies as far as the patient comfort and recovery times are concerned." @default.
• W1965767798 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965767798 creator A5026992126 @default.
• W1965767798 creator A5046760392 @default.
• W1965767798 creator A5049989383 @default.
• W1965767798 creator A5063049471 @default.
• W1965767798 creator A5063535668 @default.
• W1965767798 creator A5076724511 @default.
• W1965767798 date "2002-08-01" @default.
• W1965767798 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1965767798 title "Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study" @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2000123949 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2036535307 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2046459582 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2060809999 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2066079201 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2075002168 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2079924177 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2088243994 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2093975594 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2094127796 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2116552827 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2130538431 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2142770063 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2152281620 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W2153467911 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W4248301464 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W4251270910 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W4291746756 @default.
• W1965767798 cites W4367277595 @default.
• W1965767798 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05908.x" @default.
• W1965767798 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12190161" @default.
• W1965767798 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W1965767798 type Work @default.
• W1965767798 sameAs 1965767798 @default.
• W1965767798 citedByCount "85" @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982012 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982013 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982014 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982015 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982016 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982017 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982018 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982019 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982020 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982021 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982022 @default.
• W1965767798 countsByYear W19657677982023 @default.
• W1965767798 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965767798 hasAuthorship W1965767798A5026992126 @default.
• W1965767798 hasAuthorship W1965767798A5046760392 @default.
• W1965767798 hasAuthorship W1965767798A5049989383 @default.
• W1965767798 hasAuthorship W1965767798A5063049471 @default.
• W1965767798 hasAuthorship W1965767798A5063535668 @default.
• W1965767798 hasAuthorship W1965767798A5076724511 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2776277131 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2776814716 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2777602617 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2778000748 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2781168792 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C2781413609 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C121608353 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C126322002 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C141071460 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C151956035 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C188816634 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2776277131 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2776814716 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2777602617 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2778000748 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2778435480 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2780820201 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2781168792 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C2781413609 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C42219234 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C526805850 @default.
• W1965767798 hasConceptScore W1965767798C71924100 @default.
• W1965767798 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1965767798 hasLocation W19657677981 @default.
• W1965767798 hasLocation W19657677982 @default.
• W1965767798 hasOpenAccess W1965767798 @default.
• W1965767798 hasPrimaryLocation W19657677981 @default.
• W1965767798 hasRelatedWork W2001683931 @default.
• W1965767798 hasRelatedWork W2044122248 @default.
• W1965767798 hasRelatedWork W2067680269 @default.
• W1965767798 hasRelatedWork W2114653089 @default.
• W1965767798 hasRelatedWork W2115823456 @default.
• W1965767798 hasRelatedWork W2361271036 @default.

• next