FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1965854609> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1965854609 endingPage "900" @default.
• W1965854609 startingPage "893" @default.
• W1965854609 abstract "Background We report our short-term experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and compare perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia. Methods Patients from an institutional review board–approved protocol underwent POEM and were followed prospectively. Comparisons were made, in a prospective esophageal database, with patients who underwent LHM over the same period. Results We studied 18 patients who underwent POEM and compared them to 21 who underwent LHM. Demographics, preoperative Eckardt scores, motility data, and prior intervention history were comparable. Operative time, myotomy length, and complication rates (1 perforation in each group) were equal. Postoperative pain was significantly different by visual analogue score (POEM 3.9 ± 0.6 versus LHM 5.7 ± 0.4, P = .02) and analgesic use (POEM 26.0 ± 13.7 versus LHM 90.0 ± 48.5 mg morphine, P = .02). Return to activities of daily living was significantly faster in the POEM group (2.2 ± 0.6 vs 6.4 ± 1.0 days, P = .03). Postoperative dysphagia and Eckardt scores were equally successful in both groups. Conclusion POEM results in similar relief of dysphagia with less postoperative pain and quicker return to normal activities. We report our short-term experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and compare perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia. Patients from an institutional review board–approved protocol underwent POEM and were followed prospectively. Comparisons were made, in a prospective esophageal database, with patients who underwent LHM over the same period. We studied 18 patients who underwent POEM and compared them to 21 who underwent LHM. Demographics, preoperative Eckardt scores, motility data, and prior intervention history were comparable. Operative time, myotomy length, and complication rates (1 perforation in each group) were equal. Postoperative pain was significantly different by visual analogue score (POEM 3.9 ± 0.6 versus LHM 5.7 ± 0.4, P = .02) and analgesic use (POEM 26.0 ± 13.7 versus LHM 90.0 ± 48.5 mg morphine, P = .02). Return to activities of daily living was significantly faster in the POEM group (2.2 ± 0.6 vs 6.4 ± 1.0 days, P = .03). Postoperative dysphagia and Eckardt scores were equally successful in both groups. POEM results in similar relief of dysphagia with less postoperative pain and quicker return to normal activities." @default.
• W1965854609 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1965854609 creator A5002225103 @default.
• W1965854609 creator A5011265888 @default.
• W1965854609 creator A5024436230 @default.
• W1965854609 creator A5046713785 @default.
• W1965854609 creator A5052756677 @default.
• W1965854609 creator A5076453498 @default.
• W1965854609 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W1965854609 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1965854609 title "Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach" @default.
• W1965854609 cites W1966382058 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W1970803263 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W1979226496 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W1983703113 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W1986096288 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W1996595323 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W1999932130 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2018876936 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2023105471 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2033379542 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2038734819 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2051675669 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2078620751 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2095416322 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2111781623 @default.
• W1965854609 cites W2120667716 @default.
• W1965854609 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.042" @default.
• W1965854609 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24074429" @default.
• W1965854609 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1965854609 type Work @default.
• W1965854609 sameAs 1965854609 @default.
• W1965854609 citedByCount "135" @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092013 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092014 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092015 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092016 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092017 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092018 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092019 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092020 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092021 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092022 @default.
• W1965854609 countsByYear W19658546092023 @default.
• W1965854609 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1965854609 hasAuthorship W1965854609A5002225103 @default.
• W1965854609 hasAuthorship W1965854609A5011265888 @default.
• W1965854609 hasAuthorship W1965854609A5024436230 @default.
• W1965854609 hasAuthorship W1965854609A5046713785 @default.
• W1965854609 hasAuthorship W1965854609A5052756677 @default.
• W1965854609 hasAuthorship W1965854609A5076453498 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C2776928572 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C2777819096 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C2779958274 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C2780596822 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C141071460 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C188816634 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C191897082 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C192562407 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C2776928572 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C2777819096 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C2778456384 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C2778527123 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C2779958274 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C2780596822 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C31174226 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C42219234 @default.
• W1965854609 hasConceptScore W1965854609C71924100 @default.
• W1965854609 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1965854609 hasLocation W19658546091 @default.
• W1965854609 hasLocation W19658546092 @default.
• W1965854609 hasOpenAccess W1965854609 @default.
• W1965854609 hasPrimaryLocation W19658546091 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W1969404886 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W1998582609 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2166649571 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2280111961 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2330107795 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2388727655 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2413875961 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2414561108 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2423233162 @default.
• W1965854609 hasRelatedWork W2730020983 @default.
• W1965854609 hasVolume "154" @default.
• W1965854609 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1965854609 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1965854609 magId "1965854609" @default.
• W1965854609 workType "article" @default.