Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966101836> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1966101836 endingPage "468" @default.
- W1966101836 startingPage "462" @default.
- W1966101836 abstract "Abstract Context: Rehabilitation protocols involving eccentric resistance exercise performed with loading more than 100% concentric 1-repetition maximum are effective in increasing muscle function in both healthy and injured populations. The mode of eccentric exercise (isokinetic versus isotonic) may be an important factor in limiting symptoms of delayed-onset muscle soreness and in improving muscle function after training. Objective: To compare functional and symptomatic responses after an eccentric-only (ECC) isotonic exercise protocol and after a combined concentric-eccentric (CON-ECC) isokinetic exercise protocol matched for total exercise volume. Design: Observational study. Setting: Controlled research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-four healthy, untrained, college-aged men (n = 12) and women (n = 12). Intervention(s): Participants were randomly assigned to the ECC isotonic or CON-ECC isokinetic exercise group and performed a single bout of resistance exercise involving the elbow flexors. Main Outcome Measure(s): Measurements of elbow flexion and extension, isometric strength, and muscle point tenderness were obtained before exercise (baseline) and during follow-up sessions (days 2, 4, 7, and 14). Separate 1-way analyses of variance and repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to determine outcome differences. Tukey post hoc testing was performed when indicated. Results: At baseline, no differences were present between groups for any measure. The ECC isotonic exercise protocol resulted in a 30% to 36% deficit in muscle strength, a 5% to 7% reduction in elbow flexion, and a 6% to 8% reduction in elbow extension at follow-up days 2 and 4 (P < .01). The CON-ECC isokinetic exercise protocol did not alter muscle strength or range of motion at any time when compared with baseline. Muscle point tenderness increased from baseline on days 2 and 4 in both groups (P < .05) but was not different between groups throughout the recovery period. Conclusions: Our results indicated more pronounced functional deficits occurred after a single bout of ECC isotonic exercise than with a CON-ECC isokinetic exercise protocol matched for training volume." @default.
- W1966101836 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1966101836 creator A5031048647 @default.
- W1966101836 creator A5052034980 @default.
- W1966101836 creator A5063577042 @default.
- W1966101836 creator A5087629290 @default.
- W1966101836 date "2009-09-01" @default.
- W1966101836 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W1966101836 title "Symptomatic and Functional Responses to Concentric-Eccentric Isokinetic Versus Eccentric-Only Isotonic Exercise" @default.
- W1966101836 cites W1763728913 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W1983348975 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W1987699755 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W1991951851 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2001980351 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2016856144 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2017106770 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2021716493 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2034523759 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2048688384 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2050979150 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2064501536 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2064857584 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2066412888 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2085274796 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2085626905 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2092844206 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2093480307 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2101240360 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2116313729 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2119632244 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2135820933 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2152223151 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2152557998 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2156516556 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2156796591 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2162130278 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W2163955947 @default.
- W1966101836 cites W4242868892 @default.
- W1966101836 doi "https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44.5.462" @default.
- W1966101836 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2742454" @default.
- W1966101836 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19771283" @default.
- W1966101836 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W1966101836 type Work @default.
- W1966101836 sameAs 1966101836 @default.
- W1966101836 citedByCount "23" @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362012 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362013 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362014 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362015 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362017 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362018 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362019 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362020 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362021 @default.
- W1966101836 countsByYear W19661018362022 @default.
- W1966101836 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1966101836 hasAuthorship W1966101836A5031048647 @default.
- W1966101836 hasAuthorship W1966101836A5052034980 @default.
- W1966101836 hasAuthorship W1966101836A5063577042 @default.
- W1966101836 hasAuthorship W1966101836A5087629290 @default.
- W1966101836 hasBestOaLocation W19661018361 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C100784341 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C102959455 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C103486182 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C133165541 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C2909056506 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C77056095 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C90296322 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C100784341 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C102959455 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C103486182 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C105795698 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C121332964 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C126322002 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C133165541 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C141071460 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C151730666 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C1862650 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C2524010 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C2779343474 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C2781184374 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C2909056506 @default.
- W1966101836 hasConceptScore W1966101836C33923547 @default.