FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966109015> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966109015 endingPage "107" @default.
• W1966109015 startingPage "63" @default.
• W1966109015 abstract "63 Vol. 10, No. 1 Late Imperial ChinaJune 1989 THE QIANLONG RETROSPECT ON THE CHINESE-MARTIAL (hanjun) BANNERS Pamela Kyle Crossley* Few Chinese dynasties, and no alien dynasties in China, were secured without a means of transforming the conquered into conquerors. For the Qing (1636-1912) this process began among the Jurchens of the Northeast during Nurgaci's wars of unification in the late sixteenth century. The dynamics of subjugation and incorporation refined among the Jurchens were applied to the varied populations of Liaodong, and finally, after 1644, within China Proper (guannei). But when the empire was stabilized in the middle eighteenth century, the transformation of the conquered into conquerors became of secondary importance to the establishment and enforcement of an immutable code of loyalty (zhong).1 In its political manifestations, loyalty was a self-evident requirement for the Qing as for all other dynasties. The Qianlong (1736-1795) emperor, however, sought to elevate an abstract construct capable of superceding dissonances of This article began as a paper presented to the AAS annual meeting in 1988; I owe first thanks to the panel participants, Lynn Struve and Wang Chen-main, and to the panel discussants , Frederic Wakeman and Jerry Dennerline. The draft has benefited from an extended discussion of ideas with Ann-ping Chin, Arthur Waldron and Thomas Bartlett; the searching and generous critical guidance of the anonymous referee; Lillian M. Li and Charlotte Fürth; and by the comments of Evelyn S. Rawski, and Gertraude Roth Li. For editorial assistance I am indebted to Barbara Calli and Jonathan Tyler. I claim all stubbornly persisting errors of fact or judgment, and all infelicities of language. Research for this paper was begun at the Qingshi yanjiu suo, Renmin daxue, Beijing, and I am particularly indebted to Li Hongbin for bibliographical guidance. The original draft was completed while I was a fellow at the Bunting Institute, Radcliffe College, to whom I am grateful for institutional support; for the long period over which this essay was intermittently researched, written and revised I enjoyed the financial support of the Committee for Advanced Study/Committee for Scholarly Exchange with the People's Republic of China/National Academy of Sciences, the Wang Fellowships in Chinese Studies and Dartmouth College faculty research funds; I remain indebted to the staff of Baker Library, Dartmouth College and to the collections and staff of the HarvardYenching Library. 1 Preliminary work on the diachrony of posthumous titles (shi) for the Qing has been provided in early work by Abe Takeo, Shincho to ka i shisho, where, most specific to the present discussion, it is shown that the epithet zhong, loyal, became the most frequent shi only during the Qianlong period, displacing wen, cultured, which had been most common in earlier eras. See also Fisher, Lu Liu-liang:180-185. 64Pamela Kyle Crossley cultural, racial or personal affinities, to all of which the Qing were vulnerable . The court could not escape the fact that because of its regionalist origins and because of the history to which it now traced its legitimacy, it actually had at least two systems of loyalty at hand, which it attempted to ascribe to sectors of the population on the basis of an increasingly racialist criterion. The character of loyalty was only one of the contradictions with which the eighteenth-century court had to deal, and the tendency of the court was not to resolve contradictions, but to accommodate them. Perhaps no political class in Qing China was as precisely poised between the contradictions of the ideology of loyalty of the Qianlong period as were the Chinese-martial, or hanjun bannermen.2 By the later Qianlong period, the court was seeking manifestation of its universalism in a progressively rigid taxonomy of culturally-distinct races within the empire. Idealization of cultural types was emergent,3 and in the case of Manchu and Mongol bannermen particularly, prescribed cultural attributes on the basis of genealogical affiliations entered more and more frequently into court instructions.4 By degrees the state moved from its seventeenth2 On the principle that one should attempt translation of even the untranslatable, Chinesemartial is offered here for hanjun. The use of hanjun in the Qing records is anomalistic..." @default.
• W1966109015 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966109015 creator A5051422734 @default.
• W1966109015 date "1989-01-01" @default.
• W1966109015 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1966109015 title "The Qianlong Retrospect on the Chinese-martial (<i>hanjun</i>) Banners" @default.
• W1966109015 cites W1968112155 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W1994655976 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W1996851290 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2019954267 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2099825750 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2107541644 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2137162352 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2141460454 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2144966691 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2163199664 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2325407837 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2614859521 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2797355938 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2902730461 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W2903136806 @default.
• W1966109015 cites W649489060 @default.
• W1966109015 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/late.1989.0004" @default.
• W1966109015 hasPublicationYear "1989" @default.
• W1966109015 type Work @default.
• W1966109015 sameAs 1966109015 @default.
• W1966109015 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W1966109015 countsByYear W19661090152019 @default.
• W1966109015 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966109015 hasAuthorship W1966109015A5051422734 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C2776501734 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C2777228553 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C2778495208 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C166957645 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C17744445 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C191935318 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C195244886 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C199539241 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C2776501734 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C2777228553 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C2778495208 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C74916050 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C94625758 @default.
• W1966109015 hasConceptScore W1966109015C95457728 @default.
• W1966109015 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1966109015 hasLocation W19661090151 @default.
• W1966109015 hasOpenAccess W1966109015 @default.
• W1966109015 hasPrimaryLocation W19661090151 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W1520723488 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W2021991382 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W2109699747 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W2327412326 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W2364752994 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W2483432617 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W2955175025 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W3037532318 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W4313034143 @default.
• W1966109015 hasRelatedWork W925006589 @default.
• W1966109015 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W1966109015 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1966109015 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1966109015 magId "1966109015" @default.
• W1966109015 workType "article" @default.