Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966154140> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W1966154140 endingPage "92" @default.
- W1966154140 startingPage "87" @default.
- W1966154140 abstract "Foi avaliada a precisão das imagens digitais, obtidas com o Sistema Digora e radiografias convencionais, na localização e visualização de defeitos ósseos criados experimentalmente, em mandíbulas humanas secas. As imagens digitalizadas, padrão, 3D e com inversão de contraste, foram comparadas com as radiografias convencionais, obtidas com filmes Ekta-speed Plus EP-21 da Kodak. Os resultados mostraram que os defeitos produzidos no osso cortical foram melhores detectados do que os do osso esponjoso. A radiografia convencional foi a que melhor mostrou o defeito do osso cortical e a digitalizada no osso esponjoso. Entre as digitalizadas a melhor foi a padrão e com inversão de contraste. Em todas as imagens, radiografia convenciona e digitalizadas os defeitos somente foram visualizados quando alcançou o tamanho de uma broca número 6. This study evaluated the accuracy of conventional radiography and photostimulate phosphor plate system in localizing and visualizing experimentally created bone defects. Dry human mandibles with good bone integrity in the evaluated regions were selected. The bone defects were performed on the mandibule external face from the central incisors to the first premolar and within the posterior teeth sockets, using round burs # 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10, in low rotation. The mandibles were radiographed with Ekta-speed Plus EP-21 Kodak film and optical plates of the Digora system. The visualization of bone defects was performed in the radiographic images, with the aid of a viewbox; in the digital images (standard, 3D, contrast inversion), it was performed in the computers screen, with the support of Windows for Digora software. The findings showed that the bone defect in cortical bone are best viewed in conventional radiography and in cancelous bone are best in digital images. When digitized images were compared it was observed that standard and contrast invertion images were more accurate than those in 3D, in the visualization of bone defects." @default.
- W1966154140 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1966154140 creator A5005303532 @default.
- W1966154140 creator A5023998105 @default.
- W1966154140 creator A5025634087 @default.
- W1966154140 creator A5074765377 @default.
- W1966154140 creator A5091201826 @default.
- W1966154140 date "2007-04-01" @default.
- W1966154140 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W1966154140 title "Análise de Defeitos Ósseos Utilizando a Radiografia Convencional e Sistema de Imagem Digital Digora" @default.
- W1966154140 cites W1964581818 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W1983342875 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2004071603 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2012756158 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2014223542 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2020601773 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2021950969 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2036526362 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2039843429 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2055877785 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2076777037 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2086386962 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2095340554 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2101632467 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2134172568 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2143671046 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2158328108 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2343318757 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2475082201 @default.
- W1966154140 cites W2887964289 @default.
- W1966154140 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1646-2890(07)70065-1" @default.
- W1966154140 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W1966154140 type Work @default.
- W1966154140 sameAs 1966154140 @default.
- W1966154140 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1966154140 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1966154140 hasAuthorship W1966154140A5005303532 @default.
- W1966154140 hasAuthorship W1966154140A5023998105 @default.
- W1966154140 hasAuthorship W1966154140A5025634087 @default.
- W1966154140 hasAuthorship W1966154140A5074765377 @default.
- W1966154140 hasAuthorship W1966154140A5091201826 @default.
- W1966154140 hasBestOaLocation W19661541401 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConceptScore W1966154140C121332964 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConceptScore W1966154140C142362112 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConceptScore W1966154140C15708023 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConceptScore W1966154140C2989005 @default.
- W1966154140 hasConceptScore W1966154140C71924100 @default.
- W1966154140 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W1966154140 hasLocation W19661541401 @default.
- W1966154140 hasOpenAccess W1966154140 @default.
- W1966154140 hasPrimaryLocation W19661541401 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W1536502753 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W2740647293 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W2742816064 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W2902782467 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W2935759653 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W2997727571 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W3105167352 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W54078636 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W1501425562 @default.
- W1966154140 hasRelatedWork W2954470139 @default.
- W1966154140 hasVolume "48" @default.
- W1966154140 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1966154140 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1966154140 magId "1966154140" @default.
- W1966154140 workType "article" @default.