Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966242131> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W1966242131 endingPage "67" @default.
- W1966242131 startingPage "64" @default.
- W1966242131 abstract "Study Objective To determine the cosmetic appeal of different incision types used in gynecologic surgery. Design One hundred women between the ages of 20 and 40 years were shown 4 color photographs of a female abdomen with incision sites marked for Pfannenstiel, minilaparotomy, traditional laparoscopy, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy. The women were asked to rank the photographs on cosmetic appeal alone. An additional photograph depicting single-port laparoscopy was then added, and patients were asked to again rank the photographs. Participants were also asked basic demographic information and prior surgical history. Setting Office practice. Patients One hundred women between the ages of 20 and 40. Intervention Participants. Measurements and Main Results Minilaparotomy was ranked as the most appealing incision among the first set of photographs by 74% of the participants, and the remaining 26% preferred traditional laparoscopy. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy was ranked as the least appealing scar type by 42%, and no patient selected it as their first choice. Sixty-four percent preferred the appearance of a single-port laparoscopic scar when that option was added. The only demographic variable that reached statistical significance was the presence of prior abdominal surgery. Patients without prior surgery ranked minilaparotomy as more cosmetically appealing. Conclusions When several minimally invasive surgical approaches are possible, the patient should be counseled regarding the cosmetic results of each. Patients in this study strongly preferred the appearance of minilaparotomy and single-port incisions over full Pfannenstiel or robotic incisions." @default.
- W1966242131 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1966242131 creator A5021484364 @default.
- W1966242131 creator A5059173877 @default.
- W1966242131 date "2014-01-01" @default.
- W1966242131 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W1966242131 title "Women’s Preference of Cosmetic Results After Gynecologic Surgery" @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2007689758 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2013054699 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2017954067 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2033327929 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2039343222 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2045722872 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2050763574 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2092590548 @default.
- W1966242131 cites W2912970458 @default.
- W1966242131 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.004" @default.
- W1966242131 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24373607" @default.
- W1966242131 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W1966242131 type Work @default.
- W1966242131 sameAs 1966242131 @default.
- W1966242131 citedByCount "40" @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312014 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312015 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312016 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312017 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312018 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312019 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312020 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312021 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312022 @default.
- W1966242131 countsByYear W19662421312023 @default.
- W1966242131 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1966242131 hasAuthorship W1966242131A5021484364 @default.
- W1966242131 hasAuthorship W1966242131A5059173877 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C2779983558 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C32802771 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C119599485 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C127413603 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C141071460 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C2779983558 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C2780047204 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C32802771 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C61434518 @default.
- W1966242131 hasConceptScore W1966242131C71924100 @default.
- W1966242131 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W1966242131 hasLocation W19662421311 @default.
- W1966242131 hasLocation W19662421312 @default.
- W1966242131 hasOpenAccess W1966242131 @default.
- W1966242131 hasPrimaryLocation W19662421311 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2089201504 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W1966242131 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W1966242131 hasVolume "21" @default.
- W1966242131 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1966242131 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1966242131 magId "1966242131" @default.
- W1966242131 workType "article" @default.